Effects of Mild Hearing Loss on Auditory Processing

1985 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 337-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marion P. Downs
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Auditory Processing ◽  
Mild Hearing Loss

scholarly journals Remote Microphone Technology for Children with Hearing Loss or Auditory Processing Issues

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (04) ◽  
pp. 277-290
Author(s):  
Erin C. Schafer ◽  
Benjamin Kirby ◽  
Sharon Miller
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Auditory Processing ◽  
Multiple Disabilities ◽  
Unilateral Hearing Loss ◽  
The Poor ◽  
Global Pandemic ◽  
Reverberant Environments ◽  
Mild Hearing Loss ◽  
Children With Hearing Loss ◽  
The Impact

AbstractSchool classrooms are noisy and reverberant environments, and the poor acoustics can be a barrier to successful learning in children, particularly those with multiple disabilities, auditory processing issues, and hearing loss. A new set of listening challenges have been imposed by the recent global pandemic and subsequent online learning requirements. The goal of this article is to review the impact of poor acoustics on the performance of children with auditory processing issues, mild hearing loss, and unilateral hearing loss. In addition, we will summarize the evidence in support of remote microphone technology by these populations.

scholarly journals Auditory Processing Abilities in Children with Mild Hearing Loss

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 223-232
Author(s):  
Hyunsook Jang ◽  
Jihye Jo ◽  
Yukyung Kim
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Auditory Processing ◽  
Processing Abilities ◽  
Mild Hearing Loss

Mild Hearing Loss Can Impair Brain Function

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 4-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan H. Sanes
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Language Processing ◽  
Auditory Processing ◽  
Brain Function ◽  
Behavioral Deficits ◽  
Profound Deafness ◽  
The Central Nervous System ◽  
Mild Hearing Loss ◽  
Speech And Language Processing

The emphasis of hearing loss research has been to establish the long-term consequences of permanent, severe to profound deafness. However, auditory processing deficits can be induced by transient, mild hearing loss during childhood. These deficits in perception, speech, and language processing can persist long after normal audibility is restored. One explanation for the persistence of these deficits is that transient hearing loss causes irreversible changes to the central nervous system (CNS) cellular properties that may lead to degraded stimulus encoding. Therefore, this review evaluates the premise that mild hearing loss during development induces behavioral deficits, and that these auditory deficits are causally related to changes within the CNS.

Feasibility of smartphone-based hearing-aid apps for patients with mild hearing loss: an exploratory pilot study (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Willy Nguyen ◽  
Miseung Koo ◽  
Seung Ha Oh ◽  
Jun Ho Lee ◽  
Moo Kyun Park
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Hearing Impairment ◽  
Hearing Aids ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Hearing Aid ◽  
National Standards ◽  
Hearing In Noise ◽  
Mild Hearing Loss ◽  
Consumer Devices ◽  
Selection Of

BACKGROUND Underuse of hearing aids is caused by several factors, including the stigma associated with hearing disability, affordability, and lack of awareness of rising hearing impairment associated with the growing population. Thus, there is a significant opportunity for the development of direct-to-consumer devices. For the past few years, smartphone-based hearing-aid apps have become more numerous and diverse, but few studies have investigated them. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to elucidate the electroacoustic characteristics and potential user benefits of a selection of currently available hearing-aid apps. METHODS We investigated the apps based on hearing-aid control standards (American National Standards Institute) using measurement procedures from previous studies. We categorized the apps and excluded those we considered inefficient. We investigated a selection of user-friendly, low-end apps, EarMachine and Sound Amplifier, with warble-tone audiometry, word recognition testing in unaided and aided conditions, and hearing-in-noise test in quiet and noise-front conditions in a group of users with mild hearing impairment (n = 7) as a pilot for a future long-term investigation. Results from the apps were compared with those of a conventional hearing aid. RESULTS Five of 14 apps were considered unusable based on low scores in several metrics, while the others varied across the range of electroacoustic measurements. The apps that we considered “high end” that provided lower processing latencies and audiogram-based fitting algorithms were superior overall. The clinical performance of the listeners tended to be better when using hearing aid, while the low end hearing-aid apps had limited benefits on the users. CONCLUSIONS Some apps showed the potential to benefit users with limited cases of minimal or mild hearing loss if the inconvenience of relatively poor electroacoustic performance did not outweigh the benefits of amplification.

scholarly journals Service Delivery to Children With Mild Hearing Loss: Current Practice Patterns and Parent Perceptions

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Walker ◽  
Meredith Spratford ◽  
Sophie E. Ambrose ◽  
Lenore Holte ◽  
Jacob Oleson
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Early Intervention ◽  
Service Delivery ◽  
Current Practice ◽  
Practice Patterns ◽  
Parent Perceptions ◽  
Parent Perception ◽  
Newborn Hearing ◽  
Mild Hearing Loss

Purpose This study investigates clinical practice patterns and parent perception of intervention for children with mild hearing loss (HL). Method Ages at and delays between service delivery steps (first diagnostic evaluation, confirmation of HL, hearing aid [HA] fitting, entry into early intervention) were investigated for 113 children with mild HL. Comparisons were made to children with moderate-to-severe HL. Parents of children with mild HL reported reasons for delays and their perceptions of intervention and amplification for their children. Results Seventy-four percent of children with mild HL were identified through the newborn hearing screen; 26% were identified later due to passing or not receiving a newborn hearing screen. Ninety-four percent of children with mild HL were fit with HAs, albeit at significantly later ages than children with moderate-to-severe HL. Most parents indicated that their children benefited from HA use, but some parents expressed ambivalence toward the amount of benefit. Conclusions Audiologists appear to be moving toward regularly providing amplification for children with mild HL. However, delays in HA fittings indicate that further educating professionals and parents about the benefits of early amplification and intervention is warranted to encourage timely fitting and consistent use of HAs.

Cochlear Synaptopathy due to Mutations in otof Gene May Result in Stable Mild Hearing Loss and Severe Impairment of Speech Perception

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosamaria Santarelli ◽  
Pietro Scimemi ◽  
Marco Costantini ◽  
María Domínguez-Ruiz ◽  
Montserrat Rodríguez-Ballesteros ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Speech Perception ◽  
Severe Impairment ◽  
Mild Hearing Loss

scholarly journals Temporal Alterations to Central Auditory Processing without Synaptopathy after Lifetime Exposure to Environmental Noise

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florian Occelli ◽  
Florian Hasselmann ◽  
Jérôme Bourien ◽  
Jean-Luc Puel ◽  
Nathalie Desvignes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Auditory Cortex ◽  
Auditory Processing ◽  
Noise Exposure ◽  
Sound Intensity ◽  
Environmental Noise ◽  
Central Auditory Processing ◽  
Adult Rats ◽  
Cochlear Hair Cells ◽  
Lifetime Exposure

Abstract People are increasingly exposed to environmental noise through the cumulation of occupational and recreational activities, which is considered harmless to the auditory system, if the sound intensity remains <80 dB. However, recent evidence of noise-induced peripheral synaptic damage and central reorganizations in the auditory cortex, despite normal audiometry results, has cast doubt on the innocuousness of lifetime exposure to environmental noise. We addressed this issue by exposing adult rats to realistic and nontraumatic environmental noise, within the daily permissible noise exposure limit for humans (80 dB sound pressure level, 8 h/day) for between 3 and 18 months. We found that temporary hearing loss could be detected after 6 months of daily exposure, without leading to permanent hearing loss or to missing synaptic ribbons in cochlear hair cells. The degraded temporal representation of sounds in the auditory cortex after 18 months of exposure was very different from the effects observed after only 3 months of exposure, suggesting that modifications to the neural code continue throughout a lifetime of exposure to noise.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document