The Role of Orbital Fat Preservation in Facial Aesthetic Surgery

1996 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sam T. Hamm
2021 ◽  
Vol 148 (2) ◽  
pp. 334-338
Author(s):  
Rod J. Rohrich ◽  
James M. Stuzin ◽  
Ira L. Savetsky ◽  
Yash J. Avashia ◽  
Nikhil A. Agrawal ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (9) ◽  
pp. 1039-1043 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryson G Richards ◽  
William F Schleicher ◽  
Gehaan F D’Souza ◽  
Raymond Isakov ◽  
James E Zins
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (11) ◽  
pp. 29-38
Author(s):  
Aytül HADIMLI ◽  
Ebru SERT ◽  
Birsen KARACA SAYDAM

Recent years with the widespread use of social media, the aesthetic perception of societies has started to change. People, with the desire to be liked, turn to plastic surgery with the importance they attach to physical appearance. Women's aesthetic genital surgery operations also show a parallel trend with this trend. Aesthetic surgery operations performed in the genital area are mostly designed and focused on sexual satisfaction and attractiveness. Among these procedures that do not have a medical indication, the most common ones are; labiaplasty, perineoplasty, vaginoplasty, hymenectomy and G-point amplification. Although the operations are performed by gynecology and plastic and reconstructive surgery specialists, pre-and postoperative care is provided to the patient by midwives and nurses. In this context, in this review, it is aimed to evaluate the counseling and care role of midwives and nurses with the Ex-PLISSIT Model, as well as the recommendations of international obstetrics and gynecology associations for genital aesthetic surgery operations and these operations.


Author(s):  
Paolo Montemurro ◽  
Vincent K S Tay ◽  
Per Hedén

Abstract Background The influence of the internet and social media (SoMe) in the decision-making of patients is recognized. Plastic surgeons are aware of this trend but are entangled between ethics, professionalism, and business acumen. Objectives In this study, the authors presented the evolution of perspectives of patients and surgeons recruited through a private clinic over 5 years. Methods A questionnaire was administered to patients consulting for primary breast augmentation in 2014, 2017, and 2019. Plastic surgeons who worked at or visited the Akademikliniken in 2014, 2017, and 2019 completed a separate questionnaire. Results In total, 1646 patient responses were collected. Patients who started their information gathering with the internet increased from 68.0% to 72.9%, and 94.1% of patients looked for information about aesthetic surgery on the internet before their consultation. Patients who read about aesthetic surgery on SoMe increased 29.1%. Of 462 surgeons recruited, 62% opined that the majority of patients had gathered information online before consultation. Fewer surgeons in 2019 thought that the internet and SoMe led to better information (down from 61.7% to 35.2%). An increase from 38.3% to 65.3% of surgeons attributed it to unrealistic expectations. However, only 9.7% of surgeons would support removal of plastic surgery material from SoMe compared with 21.9% in 2014. Conclusions The increased utilization and influence of the internet and SoMe on patients and surgeons is rapid. Aesthetic plastic surgeons must equip themselves to cope with the risks and capitalize on the opportunity for patient engagement and public education.


2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 84-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
E GUNERON ◽  
N KIVRAK ◽  
S KOYUNCU ◽  
S TUNCER ◽  
A UYSAL

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 396-397
Author(s):  
Nina Schwaiger ◽  
Dirk F. Richter

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document