Editorial policies for sex and gender analysis

The Lancet ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 388 (10062) ◽  
pp. 2841-2842 ◽  
Author(s):  
Londa Schiebinger ◽  
Seth S Leopold ◽  
Virginia M Miller
2010 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 156-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stacy T. Sims ◽  
Marcia L. Stefanick ◽  
Fredi Kronenberg ◽  
Nishma A. Sachedina ◽  
Londa Schiebinger

Considerable sex and gender bias has been recognized within the field of medicine. Investigators have used sex and gender analysis to reevaluate studies and outcomes and generate new perspectives and new questions regarding differential diagnoses and treatments of men and women. Sex and gender analysis acts as an experimental control to provide critical scientific rigor; researchers who ignore it risk ignoring a possible source of error in past, current, and future science. In this article, the authors introduce some tools of sex and gender analysis and illustrate the concept of gendered innovations by demonstrating through examples how this type of analysis has profoundly enhanced human knowledge in health and disease. The authors also provide recommendations for incorporating the concepts of sex and gender analysis into nursing education and research.


2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Razmjou ◽  
Aileen M Davis ◽  
Susan B Jaglal ◽  
Richard Holtby ◽  
Robin R Richards

The Lancet ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 389 (10070) ◽  
pp. 699 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annie Duchesne ◽  
Cara Tannenbaum ◽  
Gillian Einstein

2021 ◽  
pp. 114459
Author(s):  
Sarah Rotz ◽  
Johnathan Rose ◽  
Jeff Masuda ◽  
Diana Lewis ◽  
Heather Castleden

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. e001038 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanne A E Peters ◽  
Robyn Norton

Nature ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 575 (7781) ◽  
pp. 137-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cara Tannenbaum ◽  
Robert P. Ellis ◽  
Friederike Eyssel ◽  
James Zou ◽  
Londa Schiebinger

The Lancet ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 392 (10157) ◽  
pp. 1500-1502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shirin Heidari ◽  
Vivienne C Bachelet

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document