INSTITUTIONAL CARE OF THE MENTALLY ILL

The Lancet ◽  
1958 ◽  
Vol 271 (7022) ◽  
pp. 682-684 ◽  
Author(s):  
F.N Garratt ◽  
C.R Lowe ◽  
Thomas Mckeown
1987 ◽  
Vol 151 (2) ◽  
pp. 206-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Thompson ◽  
G. Blessed

Groups of organically and functionally mentally ill psychogeriatric day patients were assessed by the 37-item Roth-Hopkins test and the abbreviated ten-item Roth-Hopkins test. The scores correlated highly, correlation being equally good for both diagnostic groups. Among the functionally ill and the mild organically ill, scores improved between first and second test. The quicker, better tolerated ten-item test is a useful test of mental impairment for psychogeriatric patients in the community, as well as in institutional care.


The Lancet ◽  
1958 ◽  
Vol 271 (7024) ◽  
pp. 798
Author(s):  
J.R. Mathers

1970 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 952
Author(s):  
Irwin D. Rinder ◽  
George W. Fairweather ◽  
David H. Sanders ◽  
Hugo Maynard ◽  
David L. Cressler

1995 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 336-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
A P W Shubsachs ◽  
R W Huws ◽  
A A Close ◽  
E P Larkin ◽  
J Falvey

All Afro-Caribbean patients admitted to the Mental Illness Division of Rampton Hospital (a Special Hospital) between 1977 and 1986 and a randomly selected control cohort of Non Afro-Caribbean patients admitted in the same period, were compared on a variety of sociodemographic, psychiatric, criminological, treatment and outcome variables. Significantly, fewer of the Afro-Caribbean patients attracted the legal classification of Psychopathic Disorder. Detailed analysis was thus restricted to mentally ill patients in the two ethnic groupings. Similarities outweighed differences. There was no difference between the groups in terms of index offence, previous custodial sentence, in-patient psychiatric admission (including previous Special Hospital admission), admission source, Mental Health Act section, length of admission (including readmission) to Special Hospitals, likelihood of discharge or place to which discharged. Medication history in Special Hospitals was similar at one year and three years after admission. Afro-Caribbean patients had a lower incidence of childhood institutional care, a decreased likelihood of a previous supervision order, an increased likelihood of a previous Court appearance and received higher doses of antipsychotic medication four weeks after admission to Special Hospital.


1990 ◽  
Vol 14 (8) ◽  
pp. 460-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. T. Malcolm

This advice to a traveller could be offered to those moving resources from institutional care of the elderly to true care in the home. While present plans concern the destination and mode of travel, less attention is paid to differences in the starting point. Health districts vary greatly in terms of numbers, movements and placements of their elderly populations. Numerical increases or decreases may be caused by migration of elderly people to traditional seaside retirement areas. A further attraction is the availability of nursing and residential homes in these belts. Such homes tend to multiply in a given area and draw in new residents from other districts leading to a disproportionately elderly population.


2007 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 149-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dermot Walsh

AbstractThis paper investigates the characteristics of those under inpatient psychiatric care in 1901 in the context of a policy formulated to provide institutional care and treatment for mentally ill persons. It presents data on admissions, discharges and deaths, their demographic and clinical characteristics and reported outcomes.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Rebecca McLaughlan

<p>Thousands of New Zealanders were treated in the nation’s mental hospitals in the late nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Existing research has examined this history of institutionalisation from the perspectives of policy, psychiatric medicine and nursing culture, but to date little has been written about the built fabric of this type of institutional care. This dissertation asks what does the architectural approach taken to Seacliff Asylum (1878-84), Kingseat Hospital (1927-40) and Cherry Farm Hospital (1943-71) indicate about official attitudes to mental illness in New Zealand. Architecture was thought to be capable of performing a curative role in the treatment of mental illness; the administrators of New Zealand’s mental hospitals stated this belief publically in various press releases and reports to the government between 1878 and 1957. This dissertation examines Seacliff, Kingseat and Cherry Farm against current thought regarding the treatment of mental illness and against best architectural practice in mental hospital design.   While these three institutions were the jewels in the crown of New Zealand’s mental hospital network, only Kingseat could be considered an exemplary hospital of its time. The compromises that occurred in the construction of Seacliff, Kingseat and Cherry Farm hospitals indicate that meeting the needs of the mentally ill was only one of a number of agendas that were addressed by the officials involved in the design of these institutions. Many of these agendas were peripheral to the delivery of mental health care, such as the political desire for colonial propaganda and professional concerns of marginalisation, and conflicted with the attainment of ideal environments for the treatment of mental illness. The needs of the mentally ill were a low priority for successive New Zealand governments who exhibited a reluctance to spend taxpayer funds on patients who were not considered curable. The architects and medical advisors involved in the design of these facilities did attempt to meet the needs of these patients; however, they were limited by a design and procurement process that elevated political and operational concerns over the curative potential of these hospitals.   This dissertation also examines the role of individuals in the design of these institutions. Architect Robert Lawson was reproached for deficiencies in the curative potential of Seacliff Asylum. Similarly, medical administrator Theodore Gray has received criticism for limiting the development of New Zealand’s wider network of mental hospital care. This dissertation establishes that Lawson and Gray deserve greater recognition for their relative contributions to the architecture created, within New Zealand, for the treatment of mental illness.</p>


1955 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
pp. 5-7
Author(s):  
ARTHUR W. PENSE ◽  
ALFRED M. STANLEY

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document