mental test score
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

62
(FIVE YEARS 23)

H-INDEX

12
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjeevan Yoganathan ◽  
Ram Raghavendra ◽  
Ignatius Joseph ◽  
Ajay Sharma

Abstract The aim of the audit was to assess if Trauma & Orthopaedic admission documentation and record-keeping met the national standards. Standards used included the ‘Royal College of Physicians-Generic Record Keeping Standards 2, 4, 6, 10’ and ‘Professional Records Standards Body, Section 2 Admission Record’. Seventeen admission criteria and eight documentation criteria where audited from the respective standards. Retrospective data were collected using A&E clerking documents, GP referral letters, admission clerking proformas and continuation notes from hospital admission. Initial data showed that only 41% of pages of documentation had appropriate patient identification details listed. Of the 17 admission criteria audited, only 7 criteria scored above 90%. The major downfalls were in vital signs (38%) and assessment scales i.e. Abbreviated Mental Test Score (18%) and venous thromboembolism assessment (32%). With regards to subsequent separate entries, the main failure was entries not listed in chronological order (48%), with only two criteria scoring above 90% (entries dated and legibility). Following the implementation of an updated admission proforma and education on documentation; only 5 of the 17 admission criteria scored 90% or above. However, 46% of pages had the correct patient identification details on admission. On subsequent ward entries, 7 out of the 8 sections had improved, with 62% of notes in chronological order. Furthermore, 4 out of the 8 documentation criteria scored above 90%. Informing staff on correct documentation helped improve doctors’ entries in patients’ notes. Improvements in the admission proforma need to be made to help meet record-keeping standards.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masoumeh Ghasemi ◽  
Homayoun Sadeghi- Bazargani ◽  
Fatemeh Bakhtari Aghdam ◽  
Koen Ponnet ◽  
Shahab Papi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Elderly pedestrians are among the most vulnerable groups in terms of traffic-related injuries. This study aimed to investigate traffic behavior and its determinants among elderly pedestrians in Iran.Methods: This cross-sectional study examined the traffic behavior of 600 elderly pedestrians in Zanjan, northwestern Iran. Pedestrian traffic behavior was evaluated in five domains (traffic violations, traffic distraction, adherence to traffic rules, aggressive behaviors, and positive behaviors) using the Pedestrian Behavior Questionnaire (PBQ). Participants’ socioeconomic status (SES) was assessed by an SES questionnaire, and cognitive function was assessed by the Abbreviated Mental Test score (AMTS). The participants were selected using the multistage random sampling method.Results: 50% of elders were man. 488 (81.3%) of them had 60-74 and 112 (18.7%) were 75 years old and above. More than 90% of elderly pedestrians showed unsafe traffic behavior. This included traffic violations and failure to adhere to traffic rules. Almost half the elders were aggressive and distracted when walking and crossing the street. Higher SES was associated with both higher cognitive status and safer traffic behavior. Higher SES, healthy cognitive function, male sex, walking more than 1 hour a day, higher levels of education, and being married were among the determinants of safe traffic behavior.Conclusion: The majority of the elders showed unsafe traffic behavior Elderly pedestrians with high SES and healthy cognitive function were more likely to exhibit safe behavior than those with low SES and cognitive dysfunction. . Interventions are needed to improve the traffic behavior of elderly pedestrians special with low SES.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brooklynn Fernandes ◽  
Zahra Goodarzi ◽  
Jayna Holroyd-Leduc

Abstract Background To understand how best to approach dementia care within primary care and its challenges, we examined the evidence related to diagnosing and managing dementia within primary care. Methods Databases searched include: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from inception to 11 May 2020. English-language systematic reviews, either quantitative or qualitative, were included if they described interventions involving the diagnosis, treatment and/or management of dementia within primary care/family medicine and outcome data was available. The risk of bias was assessed using AMSTAR 2. The review followed PRISMA guidelines and is registered with Open Science Framework. Results Twenty-one articles are included. The Mini-Cog and the MMSE were the most widely studied cognitive screening tools. The Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS) achieved high sensitivity (100 %, 95 % CI: 70-100 %) and specificity (82 %, 95 % CI: 72-90 %) within the shortest amount of time (3.16 to 5 min) within primary care. Five of six studies found that family physicians had an increased likelihood of suspecting dementia after attending an educational seminar. Case management improved behavioural symptoms, while decreasing hospitalization and emergency visits. The primary care educational intervention, Enhancing Alzheimer’s Caregiver Health (Department of Veterans Affairs), was successful at increasing carer ability to manage problem behaviours and improving outcomes for caregivers. Conclusions There are clear tools to help identify cognitive impairment in primary care, but strategies for management require further research. The findings from this systematic review will inform family physicians on how to improve dementia diagnosis and management within their primary care practice.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiara Naseri ◽  
Steven M. McPhail ◽  
Meg E. Morris ◽  
Terry P. Haines ◽  
Christopher Etherton-Beer ◽  
...  

Recently hospitalized older people are at risk of falls and face barriers to undertaking fall prevention strategies after they return home from hospital. The authors examined the effects of tailored education delivered by physiotherapists on the knowledge (capability) and the motivation of older people to engage in fall prevention after hospital discharge. Utilizing data gathered from a recent trial, data was analyzed from 390 people who were 60 years and over without impaired cognition (>7/10 abbreviated mental test score) and discharged from three Australian hospitals. Motivation and capability were measured at baseline in the hospital and at 6-months after hospital discharge by blinded assistants using structured surveys. Bivariate analysis using generalized linear modeling explored the impact of education on the capability and motivation. Engagement in fall prevention strategies was entered as an independent variable during analysis to determine associations with capability and motivation. The education significantly improved capability [−0.4, 95% CI (−0.7, −0.2), p < 0.01] and motivation [−0.8, 95% CI (−1.1, −0.5), p < 0.01] compared with social-control at the time of hospital discharge. In contrast, social-control participants gained capability and motivation over the 6-months, and no significant differences were found between groups in capability [0.001, 95% CI (−0.2, 0.2), p = 0.9] and motivation [−0.01, 95% CI (−0.3, 0.3), p = 0.9] at follow-up. Tailored fall prevention education is recommended around hospital discharge. Participants still needed to overcome barriers to falls prevention engagement post hospitalization. Thus, tailored education along with direct clinical services such as physiotherapy and social supports is warranted for older people to avoid falls and regain function following hospitalization.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanda Ho ◽  
Gordon Goh ◽  
Xuan Rong Tang ◽  
Kay Choong See

AbstractThirst is distressing but overlooked by healthcare professionals. Patients experience thirst due to comorbidities, physical or cognitive limitations, and iatrogenesis. Nasogastric tube (NGT) use and nil-by-mouth(NBM) orders are common practices that can lead to thirst. However, thirst in these populations has never been formally studied. We aim to examine prevalence of recognition and treatment of thirst among NGT + NBM and NBM patients. Our descriptive study was conducted intermittently over 25 weeks, across 1.5 years, in 12 adult general medicine wards of a tertiary hospital. Cognitively intact NGT + NBM or NBM inpatients, defined as Abbreviated Mental Test score ≥ 8, were studied. One-time questionnaire was administered. Variables included: demography, co-morbidities, clinical condition, feeding route, thirst defined by thirst distress and/or intensity ≥ 3, pain, hunger and volume status. 88 NGT + NBM and NBM patients were studied. 69.3% suffered from thirst. Thirsty patients experienced significant thirst-related distress (mean score ± SD: 5.7 ± 2.5). Subjects with previous stroke and who were euvolemic tended towards thirst. 13.6% were asked about thirst by doctors or nurses. Thirst was a major source of patient distress in our study. We suggest that thirst needs to be actively identified and targeted to achieve person-centred care.


2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii1-ii4
Author(s):  
M Ashraf ◽  
A Mahmood ◽  
K Honney

Abstract Introduction By 2021 over one million people will be living with dementia (1) costing the government an estimated £30bn a year (2). However, cognitive decline is often misdiagnosed or missed completely in hospital admissions, resulting in delays in detection and treatment for patients. Quick and simple screening tools such as the Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS) could help provide early detection and faster treatment times for such patients. Data from Queen Elizabeth Hospital Kings Lynn showed that only 56.8% of patients over the age of 75 were being assessed for cognitive function on admission, while the national targets are set at 90%. Methods A multi-cycle, trust wide, quality improvement project was used to improve screening outcomes for dementia in QEHKL. A baseline measure of screening was taken by QEHKL coding department. Five PDSA (Plan Do Study Act) cycles were undertaken, implementing interventions to aid screening at each stage. Examples include improved medical clerking booklets, trust wide education and allocated ward ‘Dementia Champions’. Performance was assessed by auditors, through patient notes and discharge letters. Results Over a 4-month period, 432 patient notes were inspected on six medical wards. Results after interventions showed a significant rise in Dementia Screening from 58.7% to 89.8%. AMTS completion was 70.7% in September 2020 on medical wards which improved to 85.7% in November 2020. Results were collected during the COVID-19 pandemic however, COVID wards were excluded. Conclusion The QI project has highlighted that education and accessible tools can improve cognitive screening numbers. An important note is, due to increased pressures during the COVID pandemic it is plausible that screening rates were adversely affected. Despite this, our figures still show positive improvement. The next cycle of our project includes surgical wards and we expect by the time of presentation to have this data to show.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Gurusinghe ◽  
K Weerasinghe ◽  
D Navaratnam ◽  
G Gophinath ◽  
G Castejon Morales ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Neck of femur fracture (NOFF) carries significant morbidity, mortality, and cost implication to the health system. Subsequent contralateral fracture(SCNOFF) further decreases patient performance and increases healthcare burden. The aim of this study was to identify and evaluate potential risk factors and effects of SCNOFF. Method Retrospectively analysed NOFF database from 2012 to 2019 was. Inclusion criteria were patients over 60 years with low energy fractures. Polytrauma, pathological and atypical fractures were excluded. Results There were 114 patients (4.18%) with contralateral hip fractures out of 2727 total NOFF patients. Mean age was 82 years old for the first hip fracture and 85 years for the second. Average time interval between fractures was 36 months. During the two admissions, mean decline in Abbreviated Mental Test Score(AMTS) was 0.4, deterioration of Clinical Fragility Score and Charlson Morbidity Index were from 4.5 to 5.9 (P < 0.0001), and from 5.4 to 6.1 respectively. Mobility was dropped by one level. institutional residency was increased from 23 to 46 (P > 0.0014). Conclusions There is a drastic decline in clinical frailty, mobility status and increase residential dependency following a subsequent fracture. Our findings demonstrate the importance of emphasizing preventive measures to reduce the incidence of SCNOFF.


2021 ◽  
pp. 112070002199895
Author(s):  
Holly Harman ◽  
Thomas J Walton ◽  
Gareth Chan ◽  
Philip Stott ◽  
David M Ricketts ◽  
...  

Introduction: Proximal femoral fracture is common with a high mortality (7% mortality at 30 days). Accurate determination of mortality risk allows better consenting, clinical management and expectation management. Our study aim was to develop a prognostic tool to predict 30-day mortality after proximal femoral fracture, among patients treated within a dedicated hip fracture unit. Materials and methods: We collected data from our hospital concerning 2210 patients with 2287 proximal femoral fractures. The clinical parameters of 97 patients who died within 30 days of surgery were analysed. We used logistic regression to determine if the parameters’ relationship with 30-day mortality was statistically significant or not. The statistically significant parameters were used to create a prognostic model for predicting 30-day mortality. Results: The 5 independent predictors of 30-day mortality were gender, age, admission source, preoperative Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS) and American Society of Anesthesiologists Score (ASA). The highest risk was for males >85 years, admitted from institutional care, with low preoperative mental test score and high ASA grade. Using these predictors, we formulated the G4A score. The Hosmer-Lemeshow ‘goodness of fit’ test showed good concordance between observed and predicted mortality rates. Conclusions: We recommend the use of the G4A score to predict 30-day mortality after surgery for proximal femoral fracture, particularly within dedicated hip fracture units. Further research is needed to establish whether the findings of this study are applicable on a national scale.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brooklynn Fernandes ◽  
Zahra Goodarzi ◽  
Jayna Holroyd-Leduc

Abstract Background: To understand how best to approach dementia care within primary care and its challenges, we examined the evidence related to diagnosing and managing dementia within primary care.Methods: Databases searched include: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from inception to 11 May 2020. English-language systematic reviews were included if they described interventions involving the diagnosis, treatment and/or management of dementia within primary care/family medicine and outcome data was available. The risk of bias was assessed using AMSTAR 2. The review followed PRISMA guidelines and is registered with Open Science Framework.Results: Twenty-one articles are included. The Mini-Cog and the MMSE were the most widely studied cognitive screening tools. The Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS) achieved high sensitivity (100%, 95% CI: 70%-100%) and specificity (82%, 95% CI: 72%-90%) within the shortest amount of time (3.16 to 5 minutes) within primary care. Five of six studies found that family physicians had an increased likelihood of suspecting dementia after attending an educational seminar. Case management improved behavioural symptoms, while decreasing hospitalization and emergency visits. The primary care educational intervention, Enhancing Alzheimer's Caregiver Health (Department of Veterans Affairs), was successful at increasing carer ability to manage problem behaviours and improving outcomes for caregivers.Conclusions: There are clear tools to help identify cognitive impairment in primary care, but strategies for management require further research. The findings from this systematic review will inform family physicians on how to improve dementia diagnosis and management within their primary care practice.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 215145932110010
Author(s):  
Kizzie A. Peters ◽  
Thomas J. Howe ◽  
Daniel Rossiter ◽  
Kirsty J. Hutchinson ◽  
Philip A. Rosell

Introduction: Designed in 1972 the Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS) is widely used to assess a cognition on hospital admission. The Nottingham Hip Fracture Score uses this in predicting morbidity/mortality in neck of femur fracture. The consequences of misappropriating cognitive impairment could have lasting implications. Questions about the monarchy or World War One and Two may be inappropriate for today’s diverse society. Materials and Methods: 100 patients were questioned during routine fracture clinic appointments. Patients were asked: In what year did WWII start? Who is the current monarch? Please state a memorable event in your lifetime that you would not expect another person of the same age to forget. Two-tailed Z-tests were performed between the observed proportions and those from the original AMTS validation study. Results: Only 47% (n = 47) were able to correctly answer the year in which WW2 started. A statistically significant difference when compared to the upper and lower limits from the original study (z = -4.191, p < .001.). Significance was not seen in the second question, with 97% (n-97) identifying the monarch correctly. 51% (n = 51) of participants suggested the terrorist attack on the World Trade Centre in New York as an alternative memorable event. Discussion: Some hospitals now use the 4 “A”s Test (4-AT) as a screening tool for delirium. Without amendments to the Nottingham Hip Fracture Score, AMTS use is likely to continue in orthogeriatric patients. Over time there will be a need for the AMTS to be reviewed so that it remains a true assessment of cognition. Its limitations regarding language and culture is widely acknowledged and several validated variants have been published in the literaure. Conclusions: We highlight a potential future issue with the AMTS and raise considerations for the development of an alternative question to better meet the needs of the orthogeriatric population.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document