Iron Chelation Therapy is Associated with Improved Survival in Lower Risk MDS

2017 ◽  
Vol 55 ◽  
pp. S164
Author(s):  
D. Singhal ◽  
R. Chhetri ◽  
L.A. Wee ◽  
M. Kutyna ◽  
S. Nath ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 4834-4834
Author(s):  
Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽  
Billie J. Marek ◽  
Roger M. Lyons ◽  
Noelia Martinez-Lopez ◽  
Carole Paley ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4834 Introduction Despite recent improvements in therapies for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), 60–80% will require continuing packed red cell blood (pRBC) transfusions for prolonged periods. Complications resulting from the iron burden may, therefore, become clinically significant for many patients during the course of their disease. Patients with lower-risk MDS have a greater chance of developing the long-term toxicity of iron overload because of their prolonged survival, and are more likely to benefit from effective iron chelation therapy. This report describes data from a registry designed to study the impact of iron overload and iron chelation therapy on organ function and survival in patients with lower-risk MDS. Methods This is an ongoing, prospective, non-interventional, multicenter 5-year registry in 107 US centers, enrolling 600 patients (aged ≥18 years) with lower-risk MDS (by WHO, FAB and/or IPSS criteria) and transfusional iron overload (defined as serum ferritin ≥1000 μg/L and/or having received ≤20 cumulative pRBC units and/or an ongoing transfusion requirement ≥6 units every 12 weeks). Follow-up will be performed at least every 6 months for a maximum of 60 months or until death. Recommended assessments include serum ferritin, creatinine, calculated creatinine clearance, echocardiograms, and endocrine and hematological status. Results As of May 31 2009, 391 patients have enrolled in the registry. Demographic data are available from 389 patients. Median age: 74.4 years (range 21–99); male: 218, female: 171; ethnicity: 331 Caucasian (85%), 25 African-American (6%), 24 Hispanic (6%), five Asian (1%), two Native American (0.5%), and two other (0.5%). The median time since diagnosis (n=385) was <3 years in 217 patients (56%); ≥3–<5 years in 72 (19%); ≥5–<7 years in 48 (12%); and ≥7 years in 48 (12%). The MDS classification of the patients by WHO, FAB and IPSS, as well as patients' serum ferritin and transfusion burden, are summarized in the table. The most frequent concomitant conditions classified by organ (n=384 patients) were: 205 (53%) patients with vascular, 160 (42%) endocrine, and 171 (45%) cardiac dysfunction. At registry entry, 249 patients were receiving erythropoietin; 61 granulocyte colony stimulating factor; seven hydroxyurea; 25 thalidomide (Thalomid); 147 5-azacytidine (Vidaza); 95 lenalidomide (Revlimid) and 90 decitabine (Dacogen). 137 of 391 (35%) patients were on iron chelation therapy at study entry: 34 (9%) received deferoxamine for mean and median treatment durations of 803 and 383 (range 1–4386) days, respectively, while 117 (30%) received deferasirox for mean and median durations of 488 and 396 (9–1269) days, respectively. Calculated creatinine clearance was normal (>80 mL/min) in 37 (9%) patients; mildly abnormal (51–80 mL/min) in 30 (8%); and moderately abnormal (30–50 mL/min) in nine (2%) patients. Conclusions These baseline data indicate the demographic distribution as well as the co-morbidities associated with lower-risk MDS patients. In spite of recent guidelines, fewer than 50% of iron-overloaded patients are receiving any iron chelation treatment, despite the presence of cardiac, vascular and endocrine concomitant conditions in 40-54% of patients. Recent retrospective data highlights the impact of chelation on mortality in lower-risk MDS patients. This ongoing registry will prospectively assess the impact of iron chelation on survival and organ function in iron-overloaded patients with lower-risk MDS. Disclosures Lyons: Novartis: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genzyme: Research Funding. Martinez-Lopez:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Paley:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Greenberg:Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.


2010 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 864-870 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Rose ◽  
Sabine Brechignac ◽  
Dominique Vassilief ◽  
Laurent Pascal ◽  
Aspasia Stamatoullas ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 5221-5221
Author(s):  
Keith Tolley ◽  
Joao Vieira ◽  
Craig Foster ◽  
Amanda Strickson ◽  
Stephanie Kundishora

Abstract Iron overload due to frequent blood transfusions in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is associated with complications, including a risk of cardiac disease and transformation to acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). Iron chelation therapy (ICT) with deferasirox and desferrioxamine is an essential part of the management of iron overload in low and intermediate prognostic risk MDS patients [NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Myelodysplastic Syndromes; Bennett 2008]. However, despite the risks of cardiac complications and AML, prior to 2009 there was little published evidence that ICT could improve survival outcomes in patients with MDS. A PubMed and ASH abstract search (conducted July 2013) has revealed a growing body of evidence indicating increased survival of a median of 2 – 6 years in transfusion-dependent MDS patients treated with ICT, relative to patients without ICT (see Table).ReferenceStudy objectiveStudy designTreatments/patient numbersKey resultFox 2009Neukirchen 2012Survival outcomes in MDS pts receiving ICTRetrospective matched-pair analysis N=188 low-int. MDS:N=94 ICTN=94 no ICTMedian survival = 74 mths in ICT pts vs. 49 mths in non-ICT pts (p=0.002)Raptis 2009Outcomes in low-risk MDS pts with/ without ICTRetrospective, single-arm analysis: 9 US institutionsN=78 low risk MDS:N=32 ICTN=46 no ICTMedian Overall Survival (OS) = 103 mths in chelated = pts vs. 55 mths in non-chelated pts; p=0.02; multivariate HR 0.372, p=0.03Rose 2010Analyse survival in transfusion-dependent, low-risk MDS pts pts with/ without ICTMultivariate prospective analysis in low/Int-1 IPSS MDS: 18 centers in FranceN=97 low-int. MDSN=44 no ICTN=53 ICTMedian OS 53 mths in non-ICT pts, 124 mths in ICT pts (p=<0.0003). In multivariate analysis ICT significantly associated with improved OS (HR of 0.386, CI: 0.196-0.757, p=0.005). Leitch 2011Survival outcomes in MDS pts receiving DFORetrospective chart review of 178 MDS pts in CanadaN=178 low-int. MDS receiving DFOIn MDS pts receiving ICT, there was a significant improvement in OS. Median OS for all MDS pts = 36 mthsLyons 2011Impact of chelation on clinical outcomes and OS in low-risk MDS ptsRetrospective analysis from MDS registry: 107 US centresN=600 low-int. MDSN=263 received ICT, (191 received ≥6 mths)Mean time to AML transformation was 27.3 mths in non-ICT pts vs. 40.6 mths in ICT pts. Median survival 52.2 (with ICT) vs.99.3 mths (no ICT); p<0.0001Komrokji 2011 Impact of ICT on OS, AML transformation in low-risk MDS ptsRetrospective pt chart review from a US centre N=97 low-int. MDS:N=45 ICT (N=35 DFX; N=10 DFO)N=52 no ICTMedian OS 59 mths for pts with ICT vs. 33.7 mths no ICT (p<0.013; HR 0.52). Leitch 2012Survival outcomes in lower risk/RARS pts with ICTRetrospective pt chart review in CanadaN=268 lower risk MDSLower IPSS /Non-RARS diagnosis associated with improved survival. Median OS for non-RARS without ICT =44 mths and with ICT, OS was not reached (p<0.0001). No significant difference between RARS with ICT (134.4 mths) or without ICT treatment (99 mths).Pts: patients; ICT: iron chelating therapy; MDS: myelodysplastic syndrome; SC: Subcutaneous infusion; RA: Refractory anaemia; AML: acute myeloid leukaemia; OS: overall survival; IPSS: International Prognostic Scoring System; HR: hazard ratio; INT-1: intermediate-1; DFX: deferasirox; DFO: desferrioxamine; RARS: ring sideroblasts; SF: Serum ferritin; mths: months All the published evidence for survival benefit is in lower IPSS risk MDS patients, with a significant survival benefit seen in the sub-group of patients with non-RARS (Leitch 2012). The main limitation of the studies is that they are all based on retrospective or prospective observational study designs; hence have a risk of selection bias, although many utilize multivariate techniques to control for confounding factors. Furthermore, none of the studies assess survival associated with type of ICT although there is an ongoing RCT (TELESTO) addressing the impact of deferasirox on OS in low risk MDS patients. In addition, it would be useful to explore whether the observational data from each study could be pooled to assess OS outcomes in transfusion-dependent lower risk MDS, by MDS sub-group and by type of ICT. In conclusion, there is now extensive evidence of an association between ICT and survival improvement in transfusion-dependent lower prognostic risk MDS patients. Disclosures: Tolley: Tolley Health Economics: Consultancy. Off Label Use: ICT for patients with iron overload due to blood transfusion in patients with MDS. Vieira:Novartis: Employment. Strickson:Tolley Health Economics: Consultancy. Kundishora:Novartis: Employment.


Haematologica ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 105 (3) ◽  
pp. 640-651 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marlijn Hoeks ◽  
Ge Yu ◽  
Saskia Langemeijer ◽  
Simon Crouch ◽  
Louise de Swart ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1732-1732
Author(s):  
Heather A Leitch ◽  
Christopher Chan ◽  
Chantal S Leger ◽  
Lynda M Foltz ◽  
Khaled M Ramadan ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1732 Background: Several retrospective analyses suggest that transfusional iron overload portends inferior survival in lower risk MDS and that iron chelation therapy (ICT) is associated with improved survival in this group of patients. However an analysis of 126 patients with RARS from the Mayo Clinic showed no association between elevated ferritin level at diagnosis or transfusion burden on overall survival (OS). We performed a retrospective analysis of 268 MDS patients seen at our center to determine whether an association between transfusional iron overload or receiving iron chelation therapy (ICT) and survival differed between RARS and other lower risk MDS. Methods: Patients were identified from the clinical database of the hematology practice. Patients with a diagnosis (dx) of MDS confirmed by bone marrow biopsy (bmbx) were included. Clinical and laboratory data were collected by retrospective chart review. Survival analyses were performed using SPSS version 19. Results: 268 patients with a bmbx confirmed diagnosis of MDS by WHO or FAB criteria were identified. The following patients were excluded: uncertain IPSS score, n=35; intermediate-2 risk, n=33; high risk, n=16; RAEB-t, n=3; concomitant diagnosis of advanced stage non-Hodgkin lymphoma of uncertain type, n=1. The remaining 182 patients had the following characteristics: median age 69.5 (range 30–94) years and 109 (69.9%) were male. Specific MDS dx were: RA, n=27; RARS, n=53; RCMD, n=34; RAEB, n=15; MDS-U, n=22; hypocellular MDS, n=6; 5Q- syndrome, n=6; CMML, n=21. IPSS scores for all patients were: intermediate-1, n=101; low, n=74; uncertain (but IPSS score not >1.0), n=7. The marrow blast count was 6–9 x109/L in 4 patients and <5 x109/L in all others. Specific MDS treatment (rx) was: supportive care, n=82; erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESA), n=22; immunosuppressive therapy (IST), n=10; lenalidomide, n=7; and chemotherapy, n=6. 137 patients received RBC transfusions and 38 received ICT: deferasirox (DFX), n=19; deferoxamine (DFO), n=9; DFO followed by DFX, n=9; and DFX followed by DFO, n=1. The median duration of ICT was 10.5 (range 0.5–64) months. Clinical features significantly associated with OS in univariate analyses of all 182 patients included: specific MDS dx; IPSS score; total number of red blood cell (RBC) units transfused over the course of follow-up; receiving ICT; specific MDS rx received; requirement for hospitalization; experiencing at least one episode of infection; and AML transformation (P</=0.01 for all); serum ferritin level >1000ng/mL was not significant in this analysis (P=not significant [NS]). In a multivariate analysis (MVA), the following factors remained significant for OS: specific MDS dx; IPSS score; receiving ICT; specific MDS rx; and AML transformation (P</=0.01 for all). In an MVA stratified for RARS, significant were: specific MDS dx (P<0.0001); IPSS score (P=0.005); specific MDS rx (P=0.038) and receiving ICT (P=0.039). At a median follow-up of 28 (0.1–245.9) months, 121 patients were alive (non-RARS, n=83 [64.3%]; RARS, n=38 [71.6%]) and the projected median OS for all patient was 99 months. The projected median OS for non-RARS patients without ICT and with ICT was 44 months and not reached (NR), respectively, and for RARS without and with ICT was 99 and 134.4 months (P<0.0001). The 5 year OS in these four groups was 39.2% and 91.7% (P=0.04); and 72.4% and 76.3%, respectively (P=NS). However, when RARS ICT patients were compared to only RBC transfusion dependent RARS patients not receiving ICT, the median OS was 73.8 vs 134.4 months, respectively, and 5 year OS was 59.9% and 76.3%, respectively (P=0.025). Conclusions: These results suggest an association between receiving iron chelation therapy and survival in lower IPSS risk MDS, in keeping with prior analyses. However, the association between ICT and OS in non-RARS MDS appeared to be stronger than in RARS, in keeping with data from Mayo suggesting transfusional iron overload may not have a major association with outcome in RARS. The median follow-up in the current study was just over 2 years, and median duration of ICT only 10.5 months; longer follow-up may be needed in RARS to determine whether ICT is potentially beneficial in this subgroup of patients with a relatively long expected survival. As with all retrospective analyses, these results must be considered hypothesis generating, and prospective trials are needed for firm conclusions to be drawn. Disclosures: Leitch: Novartis Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Iron chelation agents for the treatment of transfusional iron overload in MDS. Vickars:Novartis Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.


2014 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 557-563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel Delforge ◽  
Dominik Selleslag ◽  
Yves Beguin ◽  
Agnès Triffet ◽  
Philippe Mineur ◽  
...  

1983 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glen H Stanbaugh ◽  
A. W, Holmes Diane Gillit ◽  
George W. Reichel ◽  
Mark Stranz

A patient with end-stage renal disease on CAPD, and with massive iron overload is reported. This patient had evidence of myocardial and hepatic damage probably as a result of iron overload. Treatment with desferoxamine resulted in removal of iron in the peritoneal dialysate. On the basis of preliminary studies in this patient it would appear that removal of iron by peritoneal dialysis in conjunction with chelation therapy is safe and effective. This finding should have wide-ranging signficance for patients with ESRD.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document