A note on the warm glow of giving and scope sensitivity in contingent valuation studies

2000 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 343-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.M Chilton ◽  
W.G Hutchinson
Keyword(s):  
Contingent Valuation ◽  
Warm Glow ◽  
Scope Sensitivity

scholarly journals Improving scope sensitivity in contingent valuation: Joint and separate evaluation of health states

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
José Luis Pinto‐Prades ◽  
José Antonio Robles‐Zurita ◽  
Fernando‐Ignacio Sánchez‐Martínez ◽  
José María Abellán‐Perpiñán ◽  
Jorge Martínez‐Pérez
Keyword(s):  
Contingent Valuation ◽  
Health States ◽  
Scope Sensitivity

Identifying the warm glow effect in contingent valuation

2003 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 231-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulo A.L.D Nunes ◽  
Erik Schokkaert
Keyword(s):  
Contingent Valuation ◽  
Warm Glow

scholarly journals Overheating Willingness to Pay: Who Gets Warm Glow and What It Means for Valuation

2014 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 266-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew G. Interis ◽  
Timothy C. Haab
Keyword(s):  
Willingness To Pay ◽  
Contingent Valuation ◽  
Environmental Impacts ◽  
Warm Glow ◽  
Transportation Fuel ◽  
Ceteris Paribus ◽  
The Past

In traditional contingent valuation, the researcher seeks the amount a respondent is willing, ceteris paribus, to pay to obtain something. But if a respondent receives a “warm glow” from a yes response, ceteris is not paribus. In estimating willingness to pay (WTP) to reduce environmental impacts from consumption of transportation fuel, we find that respondents who were relatively less environmentally focused in the past receive greater warm-glow benefits from a “yes” response and have greater “warm” WTP (WTP that includes warm-glow benefits). Yet respondents who were relatively more environmentally focused in the past have greater “cold” WTP (WTP excluding warm-glow benefits).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document