411 poster INTENSITY-MODULATED PROTON THERAPY WITH A REDUCED SPOT SIZE IMPROVES SALIVARY GLAND-SPARING IN OROPHARYNX CANCER

2011 ◽  
Vol 99 ◽  
pp. S163
Author(s):  
T. van de Water ◽  
A. Lomax ◽  
H.P. Bijl ◽  
C. Schilstra ◽  
E. Hug ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Salivary Gland ◽  
Proton Therapy ◽  
Spot Size ◽  
Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy ◽  
Oropharynx Cancer ◽  
Intensity Modulated

scholarly journals Early Clinical Outcomes of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy/Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Combination in Comparison with Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Alone in Oropharynx Cancer Patients

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 1549
Author(s):  
Han Gyul Yoon ◽  
Yong Chan Ahn ◽  
Dongryul Oh ◽  
Jae Myoung Noh ◽  
Seung Gyu Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Proton Therapy ◽  
Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy ◽  
Combination Group ◽  
Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy ◽  
Oropharynx Cancer ◽  
Intensity Modulated ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Early Clinical Outcomes

Purpose: To report the early clinical outcomes of combining intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) in comparison with IMRT alone in treating oropharynx cancer (OPC) patients. Materials and Methods: The medical records of 148 OPC patients who underwent definitive radiotherapy (RT) with concurrent systemic therapy, from January 2016 till December 2019 at Samsung Medical Center, were retrospectively reviewed. During the 5.5 weeks’ RT course, the initial 16 (or 18) fractions were delivered by IMRT in all patients, and the subsequent 12 (or 10) fractions were either by IMRT in 81 patients (IMRT only) or by IMPT in 67 (IMRT/IMPT combination), respectively, based on comparison of adaptive re-plan profiles and availability of equipment. Propensity-score matching (PSM) was done on 76 patients (38 from each group) for comparative analyses. Results: With the median follow-up of 24.7 months, there was no significant difference in overall survival and progression free survival between groups, both before and after PSM. Before PSM, the IMRT/IMPT combination group experienced grade ≥ 3 acute toxicities less frequently: mucositis in 37.0% and 13.4% (p < 0.001); and analgesic quantification algorithm (AQA) in 37.0% and 19.4% (p = 0.019), respectively. The same trends were observed after PSM: mucositis in 39.5% and 15.8% (p = 0.021); and AQA in 47.4% and 21.1% (p = 0.016), respectively. In multivariate logistic regression, grade ≥ 3 mucositis was significantly less frequent in the IMRT/IMPT combination group, both before and after PSM (p = 0.027 and 0.024, respectively). AQA score ≥ 3 was also less frequent in the IMRT/IMPT combination group, both before and after PSM (p = 0.085 and 0.018, respectively). Conclusions: In treating the OPC patients, with comparable early oncologic outcomes, more favorable acute toxicity profiles were achieved following IMRT/IMPT combination than IMRT alone.

scholarly journals Early Clinical Outcomes by Combination of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy and Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy in Treating Oropharynx Cancer Patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Han Gyul Yoon ◽  
Yong Chan Ahn ◽  
Dongryul Oh ◽  
Jae Myoung Noh ◽  
Seung Kyu Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Proton Therapy ◽  
Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy ◽  
Combination Group ◽  
Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy ◽  
Oropharynx Cancer ◽  
Intensity Modulated ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Early Clinical Outcomes

Purpose: To report the early clinical outcomes of combining intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and intensity‐modulated proton therapy (IMPT) in comparison with IMRT alone in treating the oropharynx cancer (OPC) patients. Materials and Methods: The medical records of 148 OPC patients were retrospectively reviewed, who underwent definitive radiotherapy (RT) with concurrent systemic therapy, from January 2016 till December 2019 at Samsung Medical Center. During the 5.5 weeks&rsquo; RT course, the initial 16 (or 18) fractions were delivered by IMRT in all patients, and the subsequent 12 (or 10) fractions were either by IMRT in 81 patients (IMRT only) or by IMPT in 67 (IMRT/IMPT combination), respectively, based on comparison of adaptive re-plan profiles and availability of equipment. Propensity‐score matching (PSM) was done on 76 patients (38 from each group) for comparative analyses. Results: With the median follow‐up of 24.7 months, there was no significant difference in overall survival and progression free survival between groups, both before and after PSM. Before PSM, IMRT/IMPT combination group experienced grade &ge;3 acute toxicities less frequently: mucositis in 37.0% and 13.4% (p&lt;0.001); and analgesic quantification algorithm (AQA) in 37.0% and 19.4% (p=0.019), respectively. The same trends were observed after PSM: mucositis in 39.5% and 15.8% (p=0.021); and AQA in 47.4% and 21.1% (p=0.016), respectively. In multivariate logistic regression, grade &ge;3 mucositis was significantly less frequent in IMRT/IMPT combination group, both before and after PSM (p=0.027 and 0.024, respectively). AQA score &ge;3 was also less frequent in IMRT/IMPT combination group, both before and after PSM (p=0.085 and 0.018, respectively). Conclusions: In treating the OPC patients, with comparable early oncologic outcomes, more favorable acute toxicity profiles were achieved following IMRT/IMPT combination than IMRT alone.

scholarly journals Patient-Reported Outcomes after Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy for Oropharynx Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 213-222
Author(s):  
Houda Bahig ◽  
Brandon G. Gunn ◽  
Adam S. Garden ◽  
Rong Ye ◽  
Kate Hutcheson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck ◽  
Proton Therapy ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Mixed Model ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy ◽  
Oropharynx Cancer ◽  
Intensity Modulated ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract Purpose To report patient-reported outcomes (PROs) derived from the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head and Neck (FACT-HN) tool, in patients with oropharynx cancer (OPC) treated with intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) in the context of first-course irradiation. Materials and Methods Patients with locally advanced OPC treated with radical IMPT between 2011 and 2018 were included in a prospective registry. FACT-HN scores were measured serially during and 24 months following IMPT. PRO changes in the FACT-HN scores over time were assessed with mixed-model analysis. Results Fifty-seven patients met inclusion criteria. Median age was 60 years (range, 41-84), and 91% had human papillomavirus-associated disease. In total, 28% received induction chemotherapy and 68% had concurrent chemotherapy. Compliance to FACT-HN questionnaire completion was 59%, 48%, and 42% at 6, 12, and 24 months after treatment, respectively. The mean FACT-General (G), FACT-Total, and FACT-Trial Outcome Index (TOI) score changes were statistically and clinically significant relative to baseline from week 3 of treatment up to week 2 after treatment. Nadir was reached at week 6 of treatment for all scores, with maximum scores dropping by 15%, 20%, and 39% compared to baseline for FACT-G, FACT-Total, and FACT-TOI, respectively. Subdomain scores of physical well-being, functional well-being, and head and neck additional concerns decreased from baseline during treatment and returned to baseline at week 4 after treatment. Conclusions IMPT was associated with a favorable PRO trajectory, characterized by an acute decline followed by rapid recovery to baseline. This study establishes the expected acute, subacute, and chronic trajectory of PROs for patients undergoing IMPT for OPC.

Dosimetric analysis of distal esophageal adenocarcinoma patients treated by intensity-modulated proton therapy with small spot size.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 159-159
Author(s):  
Chenbin Liu ◽  
Terence Tai Weng Sio ◽  
Ronik S Bhangoo ◽  
William G. Rule ◽  
Helen J. Ross ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Proton Therapy ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Spot Size ◽  
Planning System ◽  
Tube Placement ◽  
Plan Quality ◽  
Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy ◽  
Intensity Modulated ◽  
Small Spot

159 Background: Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) with small spot size has the potential to reduce dose to normal tissues but also introduces new confounding factors such as setup uncertainty, range uncertainty, and interplay effects due to breathing motion. We investigated plan quality and robustness of IMPT with small spot size for distal esophageal adenocarcinoma (DEA). Methods: 19 patients with DEA treated by IMPT were retrospectively evaluated. Spot sizes ranged from 2 to 6mm, with spot spacing of 5mm. All plans were generated using a commercial treatment planning system. In-house-developed dose-evaluation software modeled time-dependent spot delivery to incorporate interplay effects. Dose-volume-histogram (DVH) indices were used to evaluate plan quality and robustness was evaluated using the DVH band method. Results: For plan quality, median values of clinical target volume D95% and D5%-D95% (normalized to the prescribed doses), total lung mean dose, heart mean dose, and cord Dmax were 1.014, 0.035, 3.82Gy[RBE], 7.73Gy[RBE], 39.16Gy[RBE], respectively. For plan robustness, median band widths of the aforementioned DVH indices were 0.018, 0.048, 0.60Gy[RBE], 4.17Gy[RBE], and 2.36Gy[RBE], respectively. For interplay effects, median values of the aforementioned DVH indices were 0.99, 0.061, 4.07Gy[RBE], 7.87Gy[RBE], and 39.66Gy[RBE], respectively. Seven patients underwent esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation, and five, three, and one of them achieved downstaging, near complete response, and pathologic complete response, respectively; R0 resection was achieved in all cases. For all patients, acute side effects were mostly limited to grades 1-2 only. The only grade 3 adverse events were related to feeding tube placement (8 patients); there were no RT-induced pneumonitis or other lung-related toxicities. Conclusions: IMPT plans with small spot size for DEA have good target dose coverage, homogeneity and normal tissue protection. Treatment plans are also robust to uncertainties and interplay effects. Early clinical results demonstrate low acute toxicity and encouraging clinical and pathologic response.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document