scholarly journals PO-0726: Dose escalation with HDR brachytherapy for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 123 ◽  
pp. S380-S381
Author(s):  
R. Chicas-Sett ◽  
F. Celada ◽  
J. Burgos ◽  
D. Farga ◽  
M. Perez-Calatayud ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 112-112
Author(s):  
Claire Arthur ◽  
Nooreen Sarah Alam ◽  
Paula Mandall ◽  
Ric Swindell ◽  
P. Anthony Elliott ◽  
...  

112 Background: Single-fraction HDR brachytherapy offers a highly conformal approach to dose escalation for intermediate and high risk prostate cancer and exploits the apparent low α/β ratio of prostate cancer cells. The potential benefit of improving tumour control must be balanced against the heightened risk of toxicity. We assessed and compared toxicity among patients receiving either 12.5 Gy or 15 Gy as a single fraction HDR boost prior to conformal external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Methods: Between July 2008 and February 2011, 177 patients received HDR brachytherapy prior to conformal EBRT (37.5 Gy in 15 fractions). 95 patients in the early cohort received 12.5 Gy and 82 patients in the later cohort received 15 Gy. The median patient age at presentation was 67 (range 57 – 77) with a median PSA of 16.0 (range 0.29 – 102), median Gleason score 7 (range 6 – 10), clinical stages T1c to T4 and median baseline IPSS was 8 (range 0 – 27). Prospective patient questionnaires - IPSS, LENT SOMA and EPIC QoL - were completed prior to treatment and at regular intervals following EBRT (6 weeks, 6 monthly thereafter). Results: Both treatment groups had similar median IPSS values at 6 weeks (12.5 Gy = 10, 15 Gy = 11); there was no significant difference in values throughout follow-up. Mean LENT SOMA scores for bladder/urethra toxicity peaked at 6 weeks (12.5 Gy = 0.6, 15 Gy = 0.72) with no trend towards greater reporting of maximum values of ≥ 2 in the 15 Gy cohort. Rectum/bowel mean LENT SOMA scores peaked at 6 weeks (12.5 Gy = 0.30, 15 Gy = 0.39). Although a greater proportion of 15 Gy patients reported a maximum score of ≥ 2 at 6 weeks and 6 months compared with the 12.5 Gy patients, this returned to pre-treatment levels at 12 months. Conclusions: We conclude that dose escalation from 12.5 Gy to 15 Gy delivered in a single HDR fraction is not associated with a clinically significant increase in toxicity. We believe that the reported toxicity is acceptable at this level of dose escalation (2 Gy equivalent = 112 Gy, assuming an α/β ratio of 1.5). Ongoing follow-up is required to ascertain tumour control.


2014 ◽  
Vol 111 ◽  
pp. S157-S158
Author(s):  
A. Olarte Garcia ◽  
G. Valtueña ◽  
M. Cambeiro ◽  
M. Moreno ◽  
J.J. Aristu ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 106-106
Author(s):  
Juanita M. Crook ◽  
Ana Ots ◽  
Brent Parker ◽  
Matt Schmid ◽  
Deidre Batchelar ◽  
...  

106 Background: To demonstrate feasibility of using high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy to deliver 25% higher than prescription dose to the dominant intra-prostatic lesion (DIL) as defined on multi-parametric MRI for intermediate and high risk prostate cancer. Methods: Twenty six patients with predominantly unilateral disease consented to a University Ethics-approved phase II study of selective dose escalation. HDR brachytherapy was performed in weeks 1 and 3 of treatment, each delivering one fraction of 10 Gy to the whole prostate. External beam consisted of 46Gy/23 fractions starting 3 days after the first HDR fraction.T2 FSE images were obtained using 1.5T endorectal MRI in transverse, sagittal and coronal planes followed by Dynamic Contrast Enhancement after injection of gadolinium. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient maps were calculated. The DIL was contoured on the MRI and, following image registration, transposed to the preoperative TRUS performed in the treatment position. Intra-operative TRUS with source-delivery catheters in place was fused to the pre-op TRUS with the transposed DIL. The DIL was included in dose optimization criteria. Results: Twenty five of 26 patients had a visible DIL. Mean prostate percentage receiving the prescription dose (V100) was 98.2% (SD:1.1). Mean dose to 90% of the DIL (D90) was 13.2 Gy (SD: 1.7). DIL mean volume was 2.9 cc (SD:1.8) representing 9.5% (SD: 7.6) of the prostate volume. Coverage of the DIL was excellent with a median of 97% receiving the planned escalation of 25%. Established dose constraints to rectum and urethra were respected in all cases. The factor that limited DIL coverage was proximity to organs at risk. Peri-urethral location of the DIL limited coverage in five cases and two had a posterior DIL such that dose to the rectum limited escalation. However, these seven cases still achieved a mean DIL D90 of 12.2 Gy. Conclusions: Dose manipulation using US-planned HDR brachytherapy is readily achievable within the practice setting of a community cancer center. Dose escalation to the DIL to a mean of 132% of the prescribed dose for selected intermediate and high risk prostate cancer patients is feasible while respecting critical organ constraints. Further escalation is planned. Clinical trial information: NCT01605097.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document