PO-1210 Is SBRT safe in carcinoma pancreas having duodenal infiltration?

Background: Carcinoma pancreas is being diagnosed increasingly with the help of conventional imaging like ultrasonography (USG), computerized tomography (CT) scan and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).Imaging also gives the opportunity to assess resectability. In our country MRI and CT scan are not widely available and most of the pancreatic carcinoma is too advanced for curative surgical resection when diagnosed. These are unresectable carcinoma pancreas (UCP). Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of imaging in diagnosing carcinoma pancreas and to assess resectability after comparing them with peroperative findings. Methods: This retrospective study was carried out in the department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery in Bangladesh Institute for Research and Rehabilitation in Diabetic Endocrine and Metabolic disorders (BIRDEM) hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh from July 2004 to June 2006 (2 years). After laparotomy findings and histopathological confirmation 50 patients were labeled as UCP. Among 50 patients male were 28 & female patients were 22. Imaging modalities used before surgery was assessed and compared with per operative findings. USG were done in all patients and CTscan in 45 patients. MRI was done in 08 patients suspected clinically as pancreatic carcinoma where USG /CT scan had failed to reach a conclusion. Findings of the various imaging studies regarding diagnosis and unresectability were compared with per operative findings. Results: USG was able to diagnose 42 (84%) pancreatic carcinoma patients with unresectibility in 29 (69%). Forty five patients (90%) were diagnosed by CT scan and could label 38 (84.44%) as unresectable. MRI was 100% accurate to diagnose and label the entire 08 patient as unresectable carcinoma pancreas. Cumulative multimodal preoperative imaging was 91.33% accurate in diagnosing carcinoma pancreas and could tell the features of unresectibility in 73.59% patients. Conclusion: CT scan should be the primary imaging modality for diagnosing pancreatic carcinoma and its resectability. MRI is very promising for diagnosing and assessing UCP. Multimodal imaging is better than single imaging. Chattagram Maa-O-Shishu Hospital Medical College Journal Volume 12, Issue 3, September 2013: 23-26

Download Full-text

Role of computed tomography in the determination of resectability of carcinoma pancreas

International Surgery Journal ◽

10.18203/2349-2902.isj20195124 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 6 (11) ◽

pp. 4068

Author(s):

M. N. Sasikumar ◽

Chintha Salam A.

Keyword(s):

Computed Tomography ◽

Pancreatic Cancer ◽

Vascular Invasion ◽

Survival Rates ◽

Vascular Involvement ◽

Borderline Resectable ◽

Neoplastic Processes ◽

Carcinoma Pancreas ◽

Operative Findings

Background: Pancreatic cancer is one of the most aggressive neoplastic processes. Inspite of progress in the diagnosis and treatment of malignancies, the resectability and survival rates for pancreatic cancer are very poor. This study aims to determine the accuracy of computerised tomography in assessing the resectability of carcinoma pancreas.Methods: 66 patients with carcinoma pancreas, who were judged fit for surgery were studied. All cases had undergone preoperative contrast enhanced triphasic computed tomography (CT) for assessing the resectability. Radiological data was compared with per operative findings for assessments regarding vascular invasion and resectability.Results: Of the 66 cases, resectability reported by CT was 59 (89.4%). The rest of 7 (10.6%) cases were reported as unresectable. Per operatively vascular involvement was found in 14 (21.2%) cases and with no vascular invasion in 52 (78.8%) cases. All the unresectable cases reported in CT (7 cases) turned out to be unresectable. Out of 59 cases reported as resectable, 43 (65.2%) cases under went Whipples procedure, while rest of the 23 (34.8%) cases underwent palliative procedures. Out of these 23 cases, 14 (21.2%) cases were unresectable due to vascular involvement.Conclusions: The study has shown that CT does assess the operability in carcinoma pancreas, assessing mainly unresectability though less effective in assessing resectability. The role of endoscopic ultrasound and laparoscopic ultrasound in aiding CT in further assessment of resectable and borderline resectable cases are to be considered for further research.

Download Full-text