Challenges and opportunities for linking the modeling of forest vegetation dynamics with landscape planning models

2001 ◽  
Vol 56 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 107-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pete Bettinger
2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria A. Zoran ◽  
Liviu Florin V. Zoran ◽  
Adrian I. Dida

1988 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. 965-973 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J. Parks ◽  
Ralph J. Alig

Land base models in regional forest resource supply analyses project area changes in forest vegetation and land use. Models of forest vegetation dynamics are classified according to the basic modeling unit (canopy gap and forest); land use dynamics models are classified according to technique (inventory–descriptive, normative, and positive). Relationships among models used in analyzing timber supply are reviewed, including necessary links between models of forest vegetation dynamics and land use dynamics.


2011 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 819-825 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Chernetskiy ◽  
I. Pasko ◽  
A. Shevyrnogov ◽  
N. Slyusar ◽  
A. Khodyayev

1998 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clas Fries ◽  
Mattias Carlsson ◽  
Bo Dahlin ◽  
Tomas Lämås ◽  
Ola Sallnäs

This paper reviews the approaches to multiple objective landscape planning that have developed in Swedish forestry in the 1990s. The objectives of such planning include primarily timber production and maintenance of biodiversity, but also aspects such as aesthetics and recreation. The variety of approaches and models that have emerged is caused by regional differences in land-use history, forest conditions, recreation pressure, and ownership. We distinguish three approaches: The species approach and the naturalness approach integrate conservation aspects, while the multiple aspects approach integrates several aspects (biological, social, economic, spiritual, etc.) into commercial timber-producing forestry. The species approach is exemplified by the key habitat - corridor model in which key habitats and corridors are preserved to support certain species. The natural landscape model illustrates an example of the naturalness approach, as it integrates natural forest features from a fire-disturbed landscape and gives examples of management implications at the landscape as well as at the stand level. The multiple aspects approach combines several objectives and defines important structures rather loosely. This approach was developed in areas where private nonindustrial forestry dominates. Nontimber and nonconservation aspects therefore become relevant to forest management. The supportive feature model exemplifies an application of that approach.


The Holocene ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 308-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Y Novenko ◽  
Andrey N Tsyganov ◽  
Richard J Payne ◽  
Natalia G Mazei ◽  
Elena M Volkova ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (7) ◽  
pp. E1336-E1345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan David Touboul ◽  
Ann Carla Staver ◽  
Simon Asher Levin

Simple mathematical models can exhibit rich and complex behaviors. Prototypical examples of these drawn from biology and other disciplines have provided insights that extend well beyond the situations that inspired them. Here, we explore a set of simple, yet realistic, models for savanna–forest vegetation dynamics based on minimal ecological assumptions. These models are aimed at understanding how vegetation interacts with both climate (a primary global determinant of vegetation structure) and feedbacks with chronic disturbances from fire. The model includes three plant functional types—grasses, savanna trees, and forest trees. Grass and (when they allow grass to persist in their subcanopy) savanna trees promote the spread of fires, which in turn, demographically limit trees. The model exhibits a spectacular range of behaviors. In addition to bistability, analysis reveals (i) that diverse cyclic behaviors (including limit and homo- and heteroclinic cycles) occur for broad ranges of parameter space, (ii) that large shifts in landscape structure can result from endogenous dynamics and not just from external drivers or from noise, and (iii) that introducing noise into this system induces resonant and inverse resonant phenomena, some of which have never been previously observed in ecological models. Ecologically, these results raise questions about how to evaluate complicated dynamics with data. Mathematically, they lead to classes of behaviors that are likely to occur in other models with similar structure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document