P-193 Radiofrequency ablation for local control of primary lung cancer

Lung Cancer ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
pp. S139
Author(s):  
Ernest M. Scalzetti ◽  
Robert G. Dixon ◽  
Kenneth D. Murphy ◽  
Leslie A. Kohman ◽  
Stephen L. Graziano
2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 283-286
Author(s):  
Maria Theresa Tsakok ◽  
Daniel Jones ◽  
Alice MacNeill ◽  
Fergus Vincent Gleeson

Abstract A best evidence topic in thoracic surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was ‘Is microwave ablation (MWA) more effective than radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in achieving local control for primary lung cancer?’. Altogether, 439 papers were found, of which 7 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. Both are thermal ablative techniques, with microwave ablation (MWA) the newer technique and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with a longer track record. Lack of consensus with regard to definitions of technical success and efficacy and heterogeneity of study inclusions limits studies for both. The only direct comparison study does not demonstrate a difference with either technique in achieving local control. The quality of evidence for MWA is very limited by retrospective nature and heterogeneity in technique, power settings and tumour type. Tumour size and late-stage cancer were shown to be associated with higher rates of local recurrence in 1 MWA study. RFA studies were generally of a higher level of evidence comprising prospective trials, systematic review and meta-analysis. The recurrence rates for MWA and RFA overlapped, and for the included studies ranged between 16% and 44% for MWA and 9% and 58% for RFA. The current evidence, therefore, does not clearly demonstrate a benefit of MWA over RFA in achieving local control in primary lung cancer.


2009 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Hamamoto ◽  
M. Kataoka ◽  
M. Yamashita ◽  
T. Shinkai ◽  
Y. Kubo ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 417
Author(s):  
Seong Hyup Kim ◽  
Gyoo Sik Jung ◽  
Seung Ryong Lee ◽  
Ji Ho Ko ◽  
Man Hong Jung ◽  
...  

CHEST Journal ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 128 (5) ◽  
pp. 3507-3511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christophe L. Nguyen ◽  
Walter J. Scott ◽  
Nancy A. Young ◽  
Tina Rader ◽  
Lydia R. Giles ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7592-7592
Author(s):  
Y. Yamauchi ◽  
Y. Izumi ◽  
N. Tsukada ◽  
K. Asakura ◽  
M. Inoue ◽  
...  

7592 Background: Percutaneous cryoablation using high resolution fluoroscopic CT guidance under local anesthesia offers a potential tool for local control of lung tumors in combination with systemic treatments. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the safety, and efficacy of percutaneous cryoablation for lung tumors (PCLT). Methods: This study was approved by the institutional review board. From October 2002, PCLT was performed in patients who either did not oncologically fulfill the indications for resection, or refused resection. CT scan was examined every 3 months after PCLT. >20% increase in the treated lesion size was diagnosed as local failure. Survival analysis was done by Kaplan-Meier. Results: There were 147 patients (95 male, 52 female, mean age 60, 20 primary lung cancer, metastases; 29 of lung cancer, 35 of colorectal cancer, 63 of other sites). 251 sessions were done for 462 tumors. Mean tumor diameter was 18.3mm. PCLT was well tolerated in most patients. In 1 case, broncho-thoracic fistula occurred in the treated region which lead to empyema. Other complications were pneumothorax (153 sessions, 61%, chest tube required in 23 sessions), pleural effusion (160 sessions, 64%), and transient hemoptysis (82 sessions, 33%). Overall one- and two-year local control rates were 81.0% and 59.1%, respectively. Overall one- and two-year survival rates were 80.0% and 54.5%, respectively. In the 1–20 mm sized (n=362) vs. over 21mm sized (n=100) lesions, the local control rates at one year were 84% vs. 56% (p=0.0007), and at two years were 63% vs. 35% (p=0.017), respectively. There were no differences in local control between primary and metastatic tumors, carcinomas and sarcomas. Survival of patients whose lesions were limited to 1–20mm (n=89) was prolonged vs. those who had at least one over 21mm lesion (n=58) (p=0.01). However, one, and two-year survival rates did not differ significantly between these groups (one-year; 85.5% vs. 71.7% (p=0.07), two-year; 60.7% vs. 46.5% (p=0.16)). Conclusions: PCLT was minimally invasive and safe. 1–20mm tumors were good candidates. Contribution of PCLT to survival was not clear in this mixed patient population. To improve local control in over 20 mm tumors, we are computer simulating freezing kinetics to optimize the number and the positioning of the probes. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2011 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 224-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley B. Pua ◽  
Raymond H. Thornton ◽  
Stephen B. Solomon

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document