Limited impact of total parenteral nutrition on nutritional status during treatment for small cell lung cancer

Lung Cancer ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 232
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ah Young Leem ◽  
Ji Ye Jung ◽  
Sang Chul Lee ◽  
Eun Young Kim ◽  
Sang Hoon Lee ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) significantly impact surgical outcome, but the clinical usefulness of various models used to predict PPCs is questionable. The controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score reflects nutritional deficiency and inflammation and is used to predict clinical outcomes in various malignancies. We aimed to investigate the ability of the CONUT score to predict PPCs after lung resection in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods We retrospectively reviewed data of 922 patients with NSCLC who underwent complete resection at Severance Hospital in South Korea during January 2016–December 2017. We analyzed the predictability of the CONUT score for PPCs compared with other inflammatory prognostic markers and PPCs risk scoring systems (prognostic nutritional index [PNI], Glasgow prognostic score [GPS], and assessment of respiratory risk in surgical patients in Catalonia [ARISCAT] score) using receiver operating characteristic curves analysis. Results Of 922 study subjects, 522 (56.6%) were male; the mean age was 64.2 years. Lobectomy was the most common type of operation (n = 737, 79.9%). Total incidence of PPCs was 8.6% (n = 79). Prolonged air leak (44.3%) was the most common PPC, followed by pneumonia (32.9%) and pneumothorax (11.4%). The proportion of pneumonia was significantly larger in the high CONUT group (P < 0.05). The CONUT consistently had a higher area under curve (AUC) value (0.64) than other prognostic models (PNI: AUC = 0.61, GPS: AUC = 0.57, and ARISCAT: AUC = 0.54). Multivariate analysis identified male sex (odds ratio [OR] = 1.94), low body mass index (OR = 4.57), and high CONUT score (OR = 1.91) as independent PPCs prognostic factors. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significantly higher 1-year mortality rate for the high CONUT group (hazard ratio = 7.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.78–35.59). Conclusions Preoperative CONUT score is an independent predictor of PPCs and 1-year mortality in patients with NSCLC. Funding Sources None.


1990 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
R T Chlebowski ◽  
L Bulcavage ◽  
M Grosvenor ◽  
E Oktay ◽  
J B Block ◽  
...  

This randomized, prospective, placebo-controlled clinical trial compares the influence on nutritional status and survival of hydrazine sulfate with placebo addition to cisplatin-containing combination chemotherapy in patients with unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The trial consisted of 65 patients with advanced, unresectable NSCLC who had had no prior chemotherapy, were at least partially ambulatory (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] performance status [PS] level 0-2), and who had adequate hematologic, renal, and hepatic function. All patients received the same defined combination chemotherapy (cisplatin, vinblastine, and bleomycin) and the same defined dietary counseling with the addition of either three times daily oral hydrazine sulfate (60 mg) or placebo capsules. Hydrazine sulfate compared with placebo addition to chemotherapy resulted in significantly greater caloric intake and albumin maintenance (P less than .05). Considering all patients, survival was greater for the hydrazine sulfate compared with placebo group (median survival, 292 v 187 days), but the difference did not achieve statistical significance. In favorable PS patients (PS 0-1), survival was significantly prolonged (median survival, 328 days v 209 days; P less than .05) for hydrazine sulfate compared with placebo addition. In a multifactor analysis, PS, weight loss, and liver involvement were the final variables. Objective response frequency and toxicity were comparable on both arms. Hydrazine sulfate may favorably influence nutritional status and clinical outcome of patients with NSCLC. Further definitive studies of hydrazine sulfate addition to therapeutic regimens in NSCLC are warranted.


ESMO Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. e000689 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilaria Trestini ◽  
Isabella Sperduti ◽  
Marco Sposito ◽  
Dzenete Kadrija ◽  
Alessandro Drudi ◽  
...  

BackgroundNutritional derangements are common hallmarks of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nevertheless, their early detection is overlooked in clinical routine. This study aimed to evaluate nutritional status and its correlation with outcome in NSCLC patients.MethodsData regarding NSCLC patients undergoing nutritional evaluation were prospectively collected (May 2016–October 2018). Nutritional risk was assessed by Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002). Bilateral psoas major muscles were measured at L3 vertebrae level with routine staging-computed tomography and changes were evaluated using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Clinico-pathological and nutritional data were correlated to progression-free/overall survival (PFS/OS) and response rate (ORR) using a Cox and logistic regression model. Kaplan–Meier curves were compared with log-rank test.ResultsThirty-eight patients were included. The majority (65.8%) of them were at nutritional risk (NRS-2002 ≥3). At multivariate analysis for patients with advanced disease, age (HR 2.44, p=0.05), performance status (HR 2.48, p=0.043) and NRS-2002 (HR 1.74, p=0.001) were significant independent predictors for PFS and weight loss (HR 1.07, p=0.008) for OS. Patients with baseline NRS-2002 <3 had significantly longer 1-year PFS (85.7% vs 19.4%, p=0.02) and higher ORR (66.7% vs 21.4%) than those with NRS-2002 ≥3. An explorative evaluation demonstrated that NRS-2002 score significantly decreased after nutritional intervention (p=0.001) for 3 months.ConclusionBaseline nutritional risk represents a prognostic factor in NSCLC. Nutritional counselling should be applied as a fundamental tool to improve nutritional risk in a short period, ameliorating patients’ outcome.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21096-e21096
Author(s):  
Sookyung Lee ◽  
Youngkwang Seo ◽  
Wankyu Eo ◽  
Sehyun Kim ◽  
Bumsang Shim

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 3757-3768 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taro Ohba ◽  
Shinkichi Takamori ◽  
Ryo Toyozawa ◽  
Kaname Nosaki ◽  
Yasuhiro Umeyama ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document