Calculation of free field response spectrum of a non-homogeneous soil deposit from bed rock response spectrum

2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Afra ◽  
A. Pecker
1982 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 823-845 ◽  
Author(s):  
John P. Wolf ◽  
Pius Obernhuber

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danilo S. Kusanovic ◽  
Elnaz E. Seylabi ◽  
Domniki Asimaki

Soil-Structure Interaction (SSI) have been studied the last decades, and proper analysis for the linear elastic case in frequency domain has been established successfully. However, SSI is rarely considered in the seismic design of building structures. Regardless of its importance as a significant source of flexibility and energy dissipation, buildings are analyzed using a rigid base assumption, and the design is based on a response spectrum analysis, for which not only the soil, but also time are totally ignored. In a first attempt to improve and to incentivize time domain analyzes compatible with standard finite element packages for the engineering community, the state-of-practice introduces two major simplifications to transform the frequency domain analysis into a time domain analysis: (a) it assumes the frequency at which the impedance value should be read is the flexible-base frequency, and (b) it also assumes that the foundation input motion preserves the phase of the free field motion. Upon these simplifications, the following questions may arise: How does NIST recommendations perform in overall against a full finite element model? Are the embedment effects for shallow foundation not important so that the phase angle can be neglected? What is the best dimensionless frequency to estimate the soil impedance? Is it possible to make a better estimation of the dimensionless frequency to increase the NIST accuracy? In this study, we attempt to address these questions by using an inverse problem formulation.


2016 ◽  
Vol 84 ◽  
pp. 157-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Dihoru ◽  
S. Bhattacharya ◽  
F. Moccia ◽  
A.L. Simonelli ◽  
C.A. Taylor ◽  
...  

1983 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
John P. Wolf ◽  
Pius Obernhuber
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingyan Lan ◽  
Juan Liu ◽  
Xing Song

Abstract. In the complex medium system of sea area, the overlying sea water and the surface soft soil have a significant impact on the seafloor ground motion, which brings great seismic risk to the safety of offshore engineering structures. In this paper, four sets of typical free field models are constructed and established, which are land model, land model with surface soft soil, sea model and sea model with surface soft soil. The dynamic finite difference method is used to carry out two-dimensional seismic response analysis of typical free field based on the input forms about P and SV wave. By comparing the seismic response analysis results of four groups of calculation models, the effects of overlying seawater and soft soil on peak acceleration and acceleration response spectrum are studied. The results show that when SV wave is input, the peak acceleration and response spectrum of the surface of soft soil on the surface and the seabed surface can be amplified, while the overlying sea water can significantly reduce the ground motion. When P wave is used, the effect of overlying seawater and soft soil on peak acceleration and response spectrum of surface and seabed can be ignored. The peak acceleration decreases first and then increases from the bottom to the surface, and the difference of peak acceleration calculated by four free field models is not obvious. The results show that the overlying sea water and the surface soft soil layer have little effect on the peak acceleration of ground motion below the surface.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document