scholarly journals Goal programming: A new tool for optimization in petroleum reservoir history matching

1981 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 223-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.H. Sayyouh
1984 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 282-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.A. Ghoniem ◽  
S. Abdel Aliem ◽  
M.H. Sayyouh ◽  
M. El Salaly

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Borregales Reverón ◽  
H. H. Holm ◽  
O. Møyner ◽  
S. Krogstad ◽  
K.-A. Lie

Abstract The Ensemble Smoother with Multiple Data Assimilation (ES-MDA) method has been popular for petroleum reservoir history matching. However, the increasing inclusion of automatic differentiation in reservoir models opens the possibility to history-match models using gradient-based optimization. Here, we discuss, study, and compare ES-MDA and a gradient-based optimization for history-matching waterflooding models. We apply these two methods to history match reduced GPSNet-type models. To study the methods, we use an implementation of ES-MDA and a gradient-based optimization in the open-source MATLAB Reservoir Simulation Toolbox (MRST), and compare the methods in terms of history-matching quality and computational efficiency. We show complementary advantages of both ES-MDA and gradient-based optimization. ES-MDA is suitable when an exact gradient is not available and provides a satisfactory forecast of future production that often envelops the reference history data. On the other hand, gradient-based optimization is efficient if the exact gradient is available, as it then requires a low number of model evaluations. If the exact gradient is not available, using an approximate gradient or ES-MDA are good alternatives and give equivalent results in terms of computational cost and quality predictions.


SPE Journal ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (04) ◽  
pp. 1490-1507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sigurd Ivar Aanonsen ◽  
Svenn Tveit ◽  
Mathias Alerini

Summary This paper considers Bayesian methods to discriminate between models depending on posterior model probability. When applying ensemble-based methods for model updating or history matching, the uncertainties in the parameters are typically assumed to be univariate Gaussian random fields. In reality, however, there often might be several alternative scenarios that are possible a priori. We take that into account by applying the concepts of model likelihood and model probability and suggest a method that uses importance sampling to estimate these quantities from the prior and posterior ensembles. In particular, we focus on the problem of conditioning a dynamic reservoir-simulation model to frequent 4D-seismic data (e.g., permanent-reservoir-monitoring data) by tuning the top reservoir surface given several alternative prior interpretations with uncertainty. However, the methodology can easily be applied to similar problems, such as fault location and reservoir compartmentalization. Although the estimated posterior model probabilities will be uncertain, the ranking of models according to estimated probabilities appears to be quite robust.


2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reza Tavakoli ◽  
Gergina Pencheva ◽  
Mary F. Wheeler ◽  
Benjamin Ganis

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document