Treatment of nonlaparotomized (clinical) stage I and II Hodgkin’s disease patients by extended field and splenic irradiation

2000 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 1235-1238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morton Coleman ◽  
Thomas Kaufmann ◽  
Lourdes Z Nisce ◽  
John P Leonard
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin's Disease ◽  
Hodgkin’S Disease ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Splenic Irradiation ◽  
Extended Field

Results of a Prospective Trial of Mantle Irradiation Alone for Selected Patients With Early-Stage Hodgkin’s Disease

2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 736-741 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kendall H. Backstrand ◽  
Andrea K. Ng ◽  
Ronald W. Takvorian ◽  
Ellen L. Jones ◽  
David C. Fisher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin's Disease ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Hodgkin’S Disease ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Prospective Trial ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Mixed Cellularity ◽  
European Organization ◽  
Extended Field

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of mantle radiation therapy alone in selected patients with early-stage Hodgkin’s disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between October 1988 and June 2000, 87 selected patients with pathologic stage (PS) IA to IIA or clinical stage (CS) IA Hodgkin’s disease were entered onto a single-arm prospective trial of treatment with mantle irradiation alone. Eighty-three of 87 patients had ≥ 1 year of follow-up after completion of mantle irradiation and were included for analysis in this study. Thirty-seven patients had PS IA, 40 had PS IIA, and six had CS IA disease. Histologic distribution was as follows: nodular sclerosis (n = 64), lymphocyte predominant (n = 15), mixed cellularity (n = 3), and unclassified (n = 1). Median follow-up time was 61 months. RESULTS: The 5-year actuarial rates of freedom from treatment failure (FFTF) and overall survival were 86% and 100%, respectively. Eleven of 83 patients relapsed at a median time of 27 months. Nine of the 11 relapses contained at least a component below the diaphragm. All 11 patients who developed recurrent disease were alive without evidence of Hodgkin’s disease at the time of last follow-up. The 5-year FFTF in the 43 stage I patients was 92% compared with 78% in the 40 stage II patients (P = .04). Significant differences in FFTF were not seen by histology (P = .26) or by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer H-5F eligibility (P = .25). CONCLUSION: Mantle irradiation alone in selected patients with early-stage Hodgkin’s disease is associated with disease control rates comparable to those seen with extended field irradiation. The FFTF is especially favorable among stage I patients.

Clinical stages I and II Hodgkin's disease: a specifically tailored therapy according to prognostic factors.

1988 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 239-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Carde ◽  
J M Burgers ◽  
M Henry-Amar ◽  
M Hayat ◽  
W Sizoo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Hodgkin's Disease ◽  
Hodgkin’S Disease ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
European Organization ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Negative Laparotomy ◽  
Extended Field ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Better Than

The H5 program in clinical stage (CS) I to II supradiaphragmatic Hodgkin's disease (HD) was tailored to prognostic factors identified in former European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) studies. Among the 494 adult patients included in the study, the 237 patients belonging to the favorable group (H5F) underwent a staging laparotomy (Sx) in order to select the patients who could be treated with limited radiotherapy (RT) only. Thus, 198 patients (84%) with negative laparotomy were treated with RT alone and randomized to either mantle irradiation (M) or extended field mantle plus para-aortic (M + PA) irradiation. Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 99% of the patients. There was no difference in the 6-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rate (74% and 72%, respectively) or survival rate (96% and 89%). Therefore, Sx helped to define those patients who could be treated with M alone in contrast to those who required more aggressive therapy. The 39 patients with positive laparotomy were treated as the unfavorable group (H5U) from onset and randomized to either total/subtotal nodal irradiation (TNI/STNI) or a sandwiched mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (MOPP) X 3, M irradiation, MOPP X 3 protocol (3M). Although the RFS rate was higher in the 3M arm (100% v 53%; P = .002), the 6-year survival was not significantly different between the two arms (overall, 92%). In the 257 patients with initial unfavorable disease, the Sx was avoided. They were randomized to either TNI/STNI or 3M. In complete responders (96%), the 6-year RFS was 91% in the 3M arm and 77% in the TNI/STNI arm (P = .02). The pattern of failure differed in the two arms: the inverted Y and spleen irradiation controlled occult infradiaphragmatic disease better than MOPP; conversely, less patients begun on MOPP recurred in the involved mantle areas. The difference in 6-year actuarial total survival (TS) (89% and 82%; P = .05 in favor of the 3M arm) was not retrieved after exclusion of the unrelated deaths from the analysis. The two arms produced similar TS in patients under 40 years of age. TNI retains interest, especially in young men wishing to preserve fertility. The overall result shows that when treatment is tailored to initial prognostic factors, excellent results can be obtained in all patient subgroups at minimal morbidity and toxic cost.

Stage I-II pediatric Hodgkin's disease: long-term follow-up demonstrates equivalent survival rates following different management schemes.

1990 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 1128-1137 ◽  
Author(s):  
S S Donaldson ◽  
S J Whitaker ◽  
P N Plowman ◽  
M P Link ◽  
J S Malpas
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin's Disease ◽  
Hodgkin’S Disease ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Management Policy ◽  
Clinical Staging ◽  
Pathologic Staging ◽  
Field Radiation ◽  
Extended Field

The results of treatment of 171 children with stage I-II Hodgkin's disease from two institutions with differing approaches to management have been analyzed. At the Stanford University Medical Center/Children's Hospital at Stanford (SUMC/CHaS), pathologic staging followed by extended-field radiation alone or involved-field radiation plus combination chemotherapy have been cardinal to the management policy. At St Bartholomew's Hospital/The Hospital for Sick Children at Great Ormond Street (Barts/GOS), clinical staging only has been used over the last 10 years, and involved/regional-field radiotherapy used as the treatment of choice rather than extended-field radiotherapy. Some children at each institution received combined modality therapy as primary management. Relapse among children with stage I disease was a more frequent occurrence in the Barts/GOS series than in the SUMC/CHaS group. However, the survival rates from the two centers are identical, 91% at 10 years. The following scientific-philosophic question is asked: Should one maximally stage and treat all children to increase the likelihood of a high freedom from relapse (FFR; cure) rate, or is it acceptable to minimize the initial staging and treatment, realizing that a proportion of patients will fail and require salvage/rescue therapy? With the awareness of morbidity from pathologic staging and aggressive treatment, and the favorable survival data reported from specialized centers using differing approaches, treatment strategies should be directed toward the long-term goal of cure of disease with maximal quality of life. A multidisciplinary management philosophy undertaken at a center with extensive experience in pediatric Hodgkin's disease is important to achieving this goal.

Analysis of supradiaphragmatic clinical stage I and II Hodgkin's disease treated with radiation alone

1992 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 859-865 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.K. Gospodarowicz ◽  
S.B. Sutcliffe ◽  
R.M. Clark ◽  
A.J. Dembo ◽  
P.J. Fitzpatrick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin's Disease ◽  
Hodgkin’S Disease ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Stage I

Extended-field radiotherapy is superior to MOPP chemotherapy for the treatment of pathologic stage I-IIA Hodgkin's disease: eight-year update of an Italian prospective randomized study.

1992 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 378-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
G P Biti ◽  
G Cimino ◽  
C Cartoni ◽  
S M Magrini ◽  
A P Anselmo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin's Disease ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Hodgkin’S Disease ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Group Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Indicator ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Pathologic Stage ◽  
Extended Field

PURPOSE To compare the effectiveness of chemotherapy (CHT) with extended-field radiotherapy (RT) in the treatment of early-stage Hodgkin's disease (ESHD), we report an 8-year updated analysis of a study in which treatment with six cycles of mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (MOPP) CHT was randomly compared with extended-field RT. PATIENTS AND METHODS From August 1979 to December 1982, 89 adult patients with pathologic stage I-IIA Hodgkin's disease (HD) were randomly allocated to receive either RT with mantle field followed by periaortic irradiation (n = 45) or six monthly courses of MOPP CHT (n = 44). RESULTS All patients in the RT arm and 40 of 44 in the CHT arm achieved complete remission. Twelve relapses occurred in each group. Eight patients treated with MOPP and two of the RT arm died of HD. Three other patients of the CHT group died because of a second cancer. With a median follow-up greater than 8 years, the overall survival rate is significantly higher in the RT than in the CHT group (93% v 56%; P less than .001), whereas the rates of freedom from progression and relapse-free survival (RFS) were similar in the two groups (76% v 64% and 70% v 71%, respectively). Of the 12 patients relapsing after RT, 11 (92%) achieved a second CR, compared with only six of the 12 (50%) in the MOPP group. Analysis of the response rate to salvage treatments showed that the type of relapse in the MOPP group was a prognostic indicator for the achievement of a second CR, whereas in the RT group, a second CR was obtained regardless of the characteristics of the relapses. At 80 months, the probability of survival of relapsing patients calculated from time of relapse was 85% and 15% in the RT and CHT groups, respectively (P = .02). CONCLUSION We conclude that RT alone is the treatment of choice for adult patients with ESHD with favorable prognostic factors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document