scholarly journals A proper range of the international normalized ratio for left atrial thrombi resolution among candidates for percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy under oral anticoagulant therapy

2002 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
pp. 428
Author(s):  
Songkwan Silaruks ◽  
Bandit Thinkhamrop ◽  
Chaiyasith Wongvipaporn ◽  
Wirote Tantikosum ◽  
Pyatat Tatsanavivat ◽  
...  
1992 ◽  
Vol 68 (02) ◽  
pp. 160-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
P J Braun ◽  
K M Szewczyk

SummaryPlasma levels of total prothrombin and fully-carboxylated (native) prothrombin were compared with results of prothrombin time (PT) assays for patients undergoing oral anticoagulant therapy. Mean concentrations of total and native prothrombin in non-anticoagulated patients were 119 ± 13 µg/ml and 118 ± 22 µg/ml, respectively. In anticoagulated patients, INR values ranged as high as 9, and levels of total prothrombin and native prothrombin decreased with increasing INR to minimum values of 40 µg/ml and 5 µg/ml, respectively. Des-carboxy-prothrombin increased with INR, to a maximum of 60 µg/ml. The strongest correlation was observed between native prothrombin and the reciprocal of the INR (1/INR) (r = 0.89, slope = 122 µg/ml, n = 200). These results indicated that native prothrombin varied over a wider range and was more closely related to INR values than either total or des-carboxy-prothrombin. Levels of native prothrombin were decreased 2-fold from normal levels at INR = 2, indicating that the native prothrombin antigen assay may be a sensitive method for monitoring low-dose oral anticoagulant therapy. The inverse relationship between concentration of native prothrombin and INR may help in identification of appropriate therapeutic ranges for oral anticoagulant therapy.


2002 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 886-891 ◽  
Author(s):  
Songkwan Silaruks ◽  
Bandit Thinkhamrop ◽  
Wirote Tantikosum ◽  
Chaiyasith Wongvipaporn ◽  
Pyatat Tatsanavivat ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 52 (5) ◽  
pp. 529-531 ◽  

Summary The INR system of standardizing PT measurements can minimize variability between laboratories, PT reagents, and instruments. The INR system can also facilitate international agreement on therapeutic ranges and allow direct comparison of clinical trials. This should provide greater uniformity in the management of oral anticoagulant therapy and ultimately may improve patient outcomes. ASHP supports the use of the INR system on the basis of studies demonstrating that this system permits warfarin dosing that is less dependent on the variability of thromboplastin reagent sensitivity.


2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (04) ◽  
pp. 256-258
Author(s):  
M. Ivancikova ◽  
J. Sipka ◽  
M. Skamla ◽  
G. Kaliska

1987 ◽  
Vol 58 (03) ◽  
pp. 905-910 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Palareti ◽  
S Coccheri ◽  
M Poggi ◽  
M Bonetti ◽  
V Cervi ◽  
...  

SummaryThe aims of the present study were: l) interlaboratory normalization of prothrombin time (PT) testing for anticoagulant therapy control through calibration of customary thromboplastins against international reference materials, and 2) “on field” validation of the advantages offered by expression of results as International Normalized Ratio (INR) as opposedto percentage activity. PT tests were carried out over 8 days on the same normal subjects (16) and patients on oral an ticoagulants (48) in the 9 laboratories of the Bologna area. The use of customary thromboplastins and coagulometers was maintained in all labs throughout the study. The main results were: 1) the interlaboratory CV of the prothrombin ratios obtained for each sample with all customary thromboplastins (5 different brands) was 15%, but was reduced to levels of 5.8 to 8.9 when using constant thromboplastin brands and batches; 2) the International Sensitivity Index (ISI) values obtained in the different labs were only slightly influenced by the use of different coagulometers; 3) comparable ISI values were obtained through direct calibration with the international reference material and through intermediate calibration with a locally selected standard; 4) use of INR values instead of percentage activity greatly reduced interlaboratory variability and significantly improved uniformity of anticoagulation level measurements. thus reducing the possibility of erroneous prescriptions. The Bologna exercise is therefore of educational value for laboratory and community doctors of the area in understanding and accepting the INR system.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document