scholarly journals Six-month mortality rates are lower in patients with an acute coronary syndrome treated with the combination of clopidogrel and a statin than in patients treated with either therapy alone: An analysis from the global registry of acute coronary events

2003 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 361
Author(s):  
Michael J Lim ◽  
Frederick A Spencer ◽  
Joel M Gore ◽  
Omar H Dabbous ◽  
Eva M Kline-Rogers ◽  
...  
Heart ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 98 (23) ◽  
pp. 1728-1731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prashanthi V Sangu ◽  
Isuru Ranasinghe ◽  
Bernadette Aliprandi Costa ◽  
Gerard Devlin ◽  
John Elliot ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Hamza H Awad ◽  
Mohammad Zubaid ◽  
Alawi A Alsheikh-Ali ◽  
Gordon FitzgGerald ◽  
Frederick A Anderson ◽  
...  

Background: Developing countries have been under-represented in multinational cardiovascular registries despite playing an important role in global cardiovascular burden. The Arab Middle East is a unique region of the developing world where little is known about the characteristics, clinical practices, and hospital outcomes of patients hospitalized with an ACS. The objective of this study was to compare ACS patients hospitalized in the Arab Middle East to patients enrolled in a multinational ACS registry. Methods: The study sample consisted of patients (pts) recruited in 2007 with a confirmed diagnosis of ACS, including 4,445 from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) and 6,706 from the Gulf Registry of Acute Coronary Events (Gulf RACE). Results: The average age in Gulf RACE was nearly a decade younger than GRACE (56 vs 66 years). Patients in Gulf RACE were significantly more likely to be male (5,071(76%) vs 3,072(69%)), smoke (2,452(37%) vs 1,217(28%)), be diabetic (2,745(41%) vs 1,181(27%)) and have a STEMI (2,619(39%) vs 1,504(34%)), while less likely to be hypertensive (3,364(55%) vs 2,929(66%)) compared to pts in GRACE. Patients in Gulf RACE had a significantly higher odds of receiving aspirin (6,563(98%) vs 4,181(94%)) and statins (6,079(91%) vs 3,574(81%)) and significantly lower likelihood of being treated with ACE inhibitors or ARBs (4,618(69%) vs 3,574 (81%)), β-blockers (4,361(65%) vs (3,858 (87%)) and clopidogrel (3,605(54%) vs 3,274(73%)) during hospitalization. The reperfusion strategy of choice among eligible STEMI patients was thrombolysis in Gulf RACE (1,415(84%) vs 297(24%)), while in GRACE it was PCI (805(66%) vs 139(8%)). While overall unadjusted in-hospital mortality rates were not significantly different between Gulf RACE and GRACE (247(3.7%) vs 167(3.8%)), age stratified rates were higher for Gulf RACE across all strata. After adjustment for additional potential confounders, there were no significant differences in hospital mortality of pts enrolled in the two registries. All P<0.01 Conclusions: Despite differences in demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment strategies, short-term mortality rates are comparable between ACS pts enrolled in registries from different geographic settings.


2005 ◽  
Vol 149 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alvaro Avezum ◽  
Marcia Makdisse ◽  
Frederick Spencer ◽  
Joel M. Gore ◽  
Keith A.A. Fox ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 93 (3) ◽  
pp. 288-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J Goldberg ◽  
Kristen Currie ◽  
Kami White ◽  
David Brieger ◽  
Phillippe Gabriel Steg ◽  
...  

Angiology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
pp. 185-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Genovefa D. Kolovou ◽  
Niki Katsiki ◽  
Sophie Mavrogeni

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is associated with both short- and long-term unfavorable prognosis. Therefore, medical societies developed risk scores for predicting mortality and assessing decision-making regarding early aggressive treatment in patients presenting an ACS. The Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction and the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events risk scores are the most extensively investigated scores for ACS. Clinical judgment is also important. Significant differences in aggressive treatment of ACS still exist with respect to gender, age, and ethnicity. The reasons for these discrepancies need to be further elucidated in future studies. Therefore, generalizability of stratifications and risk scores in certain populations should be performed with caution.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document