scholarly journals CHEST COMPRESSIONS USING MECHANICAL DEVICES ARE MORE EFFECTIVE THAN MANUAL COMPRESSIONS IN CARDIAC ARREST CONCOMITANT WITH EMERGENCY PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION

2014 ◽  
Vol 63 (12) ◽  
pp. A1868
Author(s):  
Luis Augusto Dallan ◽  
Tulio T. Vargas ◽  
Bruno L. Janella ◽  
Jamil R. Cade ◽  
Breno Almeida ◽  
...  
Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis A Dallan ◽  
Tulio T Vargas ◽  
Bruno L Janella ◽  
Jamil R Cade ◽  
Breno O Almeida ◽  
...  

Introduction: Cardiac arrest during procedures in the Cath Lab is excessively harmful, as manual chest compressions prevents the continuity of coronary angiography and coronary angioplasty and require the assistance of trained staff in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quickly and accurately. AutoPulse® is a mechanical CPR device that consists of mechanical pneumatic band attached to a board that involves the patient’s chest and allows effective and continuous pneumatic compressions, allowing mechanical CPR simultaneously to coronary angiography and angioplasty. Hypothesis: We assessed the hypothesis that mechanical CPR may be feasible during percutaneous coronary interventions and more effective than manual CPR by the analysis of intra-coronary pressure curves. Methods: The device was used in 6 consecutive cases of cardiac arrests (ventricular fibrillation refractory to attempts of defibrillation and standard treatment) in the Cath Lab, allowing continuity of percutaneous coronary intervention concomitant with CPR. Intra-coronary curves were measured initially during manual chest compressions (manual CPR) and later, after the correct installation of AutoPulse® during mechanical compressions with this device (mechanical CPR). Results: It was possible to complete coronary angiography with the device attached to the patient in all cases, and it was also possible to complete coronary angioplasty during mechanical CPR. In all cases, mechanical CPR provided uninterrupted chest compressions more effectively and always stable in stead of manual compressions. Although a mean blood pressure of 40mmHg in both methods, mechanical CPR was able to maintain this pressure for a long time, but manual CPR had an important reduction in mean blood pressure after two minutes of CPR in all cases. Conclusions: In conclusion, percutaneous coronary interventions are feasible concurrent with mechanical CPR using AutoPulse® in patients suffering cardiac arrest in the Cath Lab. The device provided uninterrupted chest compressions more effective than manual compressions, as well as allowed the freedom of the physicians to attempt other functions, different from CPR, during the procedures.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dóra Ujvárosy ◽  
Veronika Sebestyén ◽  
Tamás Ötvös ◽  
Balázs Ratku ◽  
István Lorincz ◽  
...  

Sudden cardiac death is a leading cause of death worldwide, whereby myocardial infarction is considered the most frequent underlying condition. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is an important component of post-resuscitation care, while uninterrupted high-quality chest compressions are key determinants in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). In our paper, we evaluate a case of a female patient who suffered aborted cardiac arrest due to myocardial infarction. The ambulance crew providing prehospital care for sudden cardiac arrest used a mechanical chest compression device during advanced CPR, which enabled them to deliver ongoing resuscitation during transfer to the PCI laboratory located 20 km away from the scene. Mechanical chest compressions were continued during the primary coronary intervention. The resuscitation, carried out for 2 h and 35 min, and the coronary intervention were successful, as evidenced by the return of spontaneous circulation and by the fact that, after a short rehabilitation, the patient was discharged home with a favorable neurological outcome. Our case can serve as an example for the effective and safe use of a mechanical compression device during primary coronary intervention.


ICU Director ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henrik Wagner ◽  
Bjarne Madsen-Hardig ◽  
Malin Rundgren ◽  
Jan Harnek ◽  
Matthias Gotberg ◽  
...  

Objective. To evaluate the feasibility of cerebral oximetry (SctO2) with arterial blood pressure (ABP), central venous pressure (CVP), end tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2), pulse oximetry (SpO2), and arterial blood gases during resuscitation in the coronary catheterization laboratory (cath-lab) setting. Design. We have implemented SctO2 in our cath-lab when cardiac arrest patients are in the need of prolonged resuscitation efforts with mechanical chest compressions (MCC) during simultaneous percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Setting. An academic coronary catheterization laboratory. Patients. Five cardiac arrest patients required prolonged resuscitation efforts with MCC in the cath-lab during simultaneous PCI. Results. During MCC, median SctO2 (n = 5) was 47%, median systolic ABP (n = 5) was 88 mm Hg, mean ABP (n = 5) was 58 mm Hg, coronary perfusion pressure (n = 3) was 19 mm Hg, SpO2 (n = 4) was 81%, and ETCO2 (n = 4) was 18.8 torr (2.5 kPa). Four patients had a successful PCI, including 1 patient with a pericardial drainage for cardiac tamponade during MCC. Mean treatment time of MCC in the cath-lab was 50.8 ± 28.3 minutes (median = 45 minutes, range = 12-90 minutes). Two patients obtained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). They died in the ICU due to impaired circulation and multiorgan failure, after 32 and 60 hours, respectively. Conclusion. Cerebral oximetry seems to be a feasible noninvasive parameter in assessing the perfusion and oxygenation of the brain in cardiac arrest patients receiving chest compressions during simultaneous PCI. Further studies are needed to evaluate its use in resuscitation situations to predict ROSC, quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and neurologic outcome.


2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Göran K Olivecrona ◽  
Marko Noc ◽  
◽  

Prolonged cardiac arrest in the cath lab is associated with very high mortality rates. Use of manual chest compressions have, until recently, been the only rapid response available to circulate the patient in such scenarios. The recent introduction of mechanical chest compression devices offers a new alternative that may perform better than manual chest compressions, especially during a continued interventional procedure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document