intra aortic balloon pump
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

946
(FIVE YEARS 211)

H-INDEX

35
(FIVE YEARS 6)

Author(s):  
Hidefumi Nishida ◽  
Tae Song ◽  
David Onsager ◽  
Ann Nguyen ◽  
Jonathan Grinstein ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Hidefumi Nishida ◽  
Takeyoshi Ota ◽  
David Onsager ◽  
Jonathan Grinstein ◽  
Valluvan Jeevanandam ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuan Yang ◽  
Yong Sun ◽  
Deling Zou ◽  
Zhaoqing Sun ◽  
Xinzhong Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Ventricular septal rupture (VSR) is a rare but severe complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). For such cases, surgical repair is recommended by major guidelines, but not always possible for such cases. Case presentation A 72-year-old man presented to the emergency room. ECG showed the ST-segment was elevated by 2–3 mm in lead II, III, and aVF, with Q-waves. Coronary angiography (CAG) showed multi-vessel disease with a total occlusion of the right coronary artery (RCA) and severe stenosis of the left anterior descending artery (LAD). A diagnosis of acute inferior myocardial infarction was made. VSR occurred immediately after percutaneous coronary intervention (a 2.5 × 20 mm drug-eluting stent implanted in RCA), and the patient developed cardiogenic shock. An intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) was used to stabilize the hemodynamics. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) revealed an 11.4-mm left-to-right shunt in the interventricular septum. An attempt was made to reduce the IABP augmentation ratio for weaning on day 12 but failed. Transcatheter closure was conducted using a 24-mm double-umbrella occluder on day 28. The patient was weaned from IABP on day 31 and underwent secondary PCI for LAD lesions on day 35. The patient was discharged on day 41. Upon the last follow-up 6 years later, CAG and TTE revealed no in-stent restenosis, no left-to-right shunt, and 51% left ventricular ejection fraction. Conclusions Prolonged implementation of IABP can be a viable option to allow deferred closure of VSR in AMI patients, and transcatheter closure may be considered as a second choice for the selected senior and vulnerable patients, but the risk is still high.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Kate O'Donovan

The intra-aortic balloon pump was first introduced for the treatment of cardiogenic shock. It is now the most commonly used form of circulatory support, despite disappointing findings from the intra-aortic balloon pump SHOCK II trial ( Thiele et al, 2012 ). Common placement is via the femoral artery into the aorta, with the tip of the balloon sitting below the left subclavian artery and the distal end above the renal arteries. The balloon is timed to inflate at the beginning of diastole augmenting coronary perfusion and deflate on the R wave just before systole, reducing the afterload. Patients who may be considered for intra-aortic balloon pump insertion are those experiencing ST elevation myocardial infarction or complex ischaemic disease and cardiogenic shock. Despite advances in catheter size and technology, potential complications include bleeding from the insertion site, limb ischaemia and compartment syndrome. Cardiovascular nurses require specialist knowledge and skills concerning balloon console technology, nursing care and potential complications.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document