Care Managers Versus Carepaths: An Active Approach to Care Management Reduces Cost and Length of Stay in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure

1998 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 306A
Author(s):  
O Costantini
2016 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 921.1-921
Author(s):  
H Alkhawam ◽  
R Sogomonian ◽  
N Vyas ◽  
A Al-khazraji ◽  
JJ Lieber ◽  
...  

BackgroundSeveral studies addressed outcomes in terms of NACE and MACE in patients undergoing transradial vs tranfemoral cardiac catheterization. However, data on core quality measures such as length of stay and rehospitalization rates is lacking in the congestive heart failure population.MethodA retrospective chart analysis of 9,320 patients who were admitted to the hospital for chest pain and underwent cardiac catheterization. Based on ICD-9 codes, we included only patients with Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) with an Ejection Fracture ≤40 (HFrEF). We compared readmission rate and Length of stay in patients who underwent Transradial cardiac catheterization vs Transfemoral cardiac catheterization.ResultsOf a total 9,320 patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography, 800 patients had HFrEF. Four hundred patients underwent Transradial cardiac catheterization and 400 patients underwent Transfemoral cardiac catheterization. In the transfemoral cardiac catheterization group, 37 (9%) were readmitted within 30 days of discharge while 17 (4%) patients of 400 patients who underwent transradial cardiac catheterization were readmitted within 30 days of discharged (Odds ratio: 2.3, 95% CI: 1.8–3, p value 0.005).Length of stay was ∼5.2 days in transradial catheterization vs. ∼6 days in Transfemoral catheterization group (p 0.4).ConclusionIn our study population, transradial cardiac catheterization in HFrEF patients seemed to have a better outcome when compared to transfemoral cardiac catheterization in terms of 30-days readmission rate. Length of hospital stay was higher in the transfemoral group but did not achieve statistical significance, however. Larger studies that may also include patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are needed to investigate factors that may contribute to such outcomes.


2000 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 140-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Paul

BACKGROUND: One approach to optimize clinical and economic management of congestive heart failure is the use of multidisciplinary outpatient clinics in which advanced practice nurses coordinate care. One such clinic was developed in 1995 at a southeastern university hospital to enhance management of patients with chronic congestive heart failure. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of a multidisciplinary outpatient heart failure clinic on the clinical and economic management of patients with congestive heart failure. METHODS: Data on hospital readmissions, emergency department visits, length of stay, charges, and reimbursement from the 6 months before 15 patients joined a heart failure clinic were compared with data from the 6 months after the patients joined the clinic. RESULTS: The patients had a total of 38 hospital admissions (151 hospital days) in the 6 months before joining the clinic and 19 admissions (72 hospital days) in the 6 months afterward. The mean length of stay decreased from 4.3 days in the 6 months before joining to 3.8 days in the 6 months afterward, and the number of emergency department visits also decreased, although neither decrease was statistically significant. Mean inpatient hospital charges decreased from $10,624 per patient admission to $5893. Reimbursements were $7751 (73% collection rate) and $5138 (87% collection rate), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients seemed to benefit from participation in the heart failure clinic. If a healthcare provider is available to manage early signs and symptoms of worsening heart failure, hospital readmissions may be decreased and patients' outcomes may be improved.


Author(s):  
Sangtaeck Lim ◽  
Gaurav Gangoli ◽  
Erica Adams ◽  
Robert Hyde ◽  
Michael S. Broder ◽  
...  

The burden of complications associated with peripheral intravenous use is underevaluated, in part, due to the broad use, inconsistent coding, and lack of mandatory reporting of these devices. This study aimed to analyze the clinical and economic impact of peripheral intravenous–related complications on hospitalized patients. This analysis of Premier Perspective® Database US hospital discharge records included admissions occurring between July 1, 2013 and June 30, 2015 for pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, diabetes with complications, and major trauma (hip, spinal, cranial fractures). Admissions were assumed to include a peripheral intravenous. Admissions involving surgery, dialysis, or central venous lines were excluded. Multivariable analyses compared inpatient length of stay, cost, admission to intensive care unit, and discharge status of patients with versus without peripheral intravenous–related complications (bloodstream infection, cellulitis, thrombophlebitis, other infection, or extravasation). Models were conducted separately for congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes with complications, and overall (all 7 diagnoses) and adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics. We identified 588 375 qualifying admissions: mean (SD), age 66.1 (20.6) years; 52.4% female; and 95.2% urgent/emergent admissions. Overall, 1.76% of patients (n = 10 354) had peripheral intravenous–related complications. In adjusted analyses between patients with versus without peripheral intravenous complications, the mean (95% confidence interval) inpatient length of stay was 5.9 (5.8-6.0) days versus 3.9 (3.9-3.9) days; mean hospitalization cost was $10 895 ($10 738-$11 052) versus $7009 ($6988-$7031). Patients with complications were less likely to be discharged home versus those without (62.4% [58.6%-66.1%] vs 77.6% [74.6%-80.5%]) and were more likely to have died (3.6% [2.9%-4.2%] vs 0.7% [0.6%-0.9%]). Models restricted to single admitting diagnosis were consistent with overall results. Patients with peripheral intravenous–related complications have longer length of stay, higher costs, and greater risk of death than patients without such complications; this is true across diagnosis groups of interest. Future research should focus on reducing these complications to improve clinical and economic outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document