A comparison between estimated and true hinge axis as a reference for measuring condylar distractions and deflections from centric relation position

Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Roger Solow, DDS

Occlusal analysis is the examination and diagnosis of the forces generated by the contacting surfaces of teeth. The clinician can use both mounted diagnostic casts and the T-Scan Occlusal Analysis system to understand the role of adverse forces in a patient's dentition. These casts should be mounted in Centric Relation so that they replicate the patient's hinge axis maxillomandibular relationship, absent of tooth contact. Diagnostic casts can demonstrate the mandibular slide into maximum intercuspation, as well as illustrate the excursive contacts. The T-Scan not only records the location of tooth contacts present in Centric Relation, maximum intercuspation, and lateral excursions, but also detects the timing and relative force of all contacts. The rapid display of recorded tooth contact data in the 2- and 3-Dimensional ForceViews makes it practical for intraoral operative use. These modalities can be used separately or in concert depending on the clinical situation. This chapter discusses the clinical technique, advantages, and rationale for identifying Centric Relation prematurities with mounted diagnostic casts and the T-Scan.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunint Singh ◽  
Sharique Rehan ◽  
Jayant Palaskar ◽  
Sanjeev Mittal

The hinge axis is an imaginary line around which the condyles can rotate without translation. Terminal hinge position is the most retruded hinge position and it is significant because it is a learnable, repeatable and recordable position that coincides with the position of centric relation. There are many schools of thought regarding hinge axis. The proponents of Gnathology say that there is one transverse hinge axis common to both condyles which can be accurately located. The proponents of transographics claim that each condyle has a different transverse hinge axis and that a transograph is the only instrument that can duplicate this. Still others claim that an exact duplication of jaw movement is not possible on any machine. The aim of this article is to throw light on location, clinical use and controversies of hinge axis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-31
Author(s):  
Ézio Teseo Mainieri

Forty patients, twenty female and twenty male were selected, from a individual group. All the selected patients had twenty six teeth or more. lndividual alginate impressions were takenin the upper and lower arches. After each individual impression had taken, an índividual hinge axis procedure was effectived with a kinematic face bow. Determined the hínge axis each patient was tatued and a arbitrary face - bow was used to mount the upper cast in the gnathothesíometer. The lower cast was related to upper cast throught a centric relation registration (individual). Mounted both casts (upper and lower) in the instrument, two laterals bite registration were taken (one rigth, one left) on the patient and transfered to the gnatho-thesíometer for measurements. The results showed that Bennett moviment, occurred in 1,5 mm average and thus was related to an intimate occlusal scheme for each patient.


2015 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolina a Holen Galeković ◽  
Vesna Fugošić ◽  
Vedrana Braut ◽  
Robert Ćelić
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
pp. 84-92
Author(s):  
Anh Chi Phan ◽  
Xuan Anh Ngoc Ho

Background: The condylar position discrepancy between centric relation and maximal intercuspation has been still a controversial issue. Aims: To compare the condylar position between centric relation and maximal intercuspation using cone-beam tomography in patients without temporomandibular joints disorder. Materials and methods: To assess the condylar position in centric relation and maximal intercuspation using cone-beam tomography on 40 fifth-year and sixth-year dental students of Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy without temporomandibular joints disorder. The condylar positions are assessed following Sener classification (2009) and are compared between centric relation and maximal intercuspation using pairedsamples t-test and Mann-Whitney U-test. Results: Among 480 condye-to-fossa measurement pairs, there are 91.2% pairs having difference between two reference position but there is no significant difference. The condylar position at the superior of mandibular fossa has the greatest percentage in both centric relation and maximal intercuspation (43.8% in centric relation and 51.2% in maximal intercuspation). This greatest percentage is followed by the condylar position at posterior of mandibular fossa (32.5% in centric relation and 36.3% in maximal intercuspation). Lastly, the condylar position at the anterior of mandibular fossa has the fewest percentage (23.7% in centric relation and 12.5% in maximal intercuspation). Conclusion: There is no significant difference of condylar position between centric relation and maximal intercuspation in patients without temporomandibular joints disorder. Key words: Condylar position, centric relation, maximal intercuspation, cone-beam tomography


Author(s):  
Adriaan J. J. Zonnenberg ◽  
Jens Christoph Türp ◽  
Charles S. Greene

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document