β-Cell replacement therapy (pancreas and islet transplantation) for treatment of diabetes mellitus: an integrated approach

2004 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 135-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
David E.R. Sutherland ◽  
Angelika Gruessner ◽  
Bernhard J. Hering
2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 343-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R. Rickels ◽  
Peter G. Stock ◽  
Eelco J. P. de Koning ◽  
Lorenzo Piemonti ◽  
Johann Pratschke ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 102 (9) ◽  
pp. 1479-1486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R. Rickels ◽  
Peter G. Stock ◽  
Eelco J.P. de Koning ◽  
Lorenzo Piemonti ◽  
Johann Pratschke ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Espen Nordheim ◽  
Jørn Petter Lindal ◽  
Espen Nordheim ◽  
Anders Åsberg ◽  
Kåre Birkeland ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Aims β-cell replacement therapy, with either pancreas or islet transplantation, is a treatment option for selected patients with brittle type 1 diabetes. All patients referred to the national transplant centre for assessment of this treatment, are evaluated in the outpatient clinic before any work-up for transplantation is initiated. Before 2015, this assessment was performed by a nephrologist alone, while from 2015 the assessment has also included an endocrinologist, a transplant surgeon and a psychiatrist in a multidisciplinary team. Method The proportion of patients accepted for transplantation before and after the multidisciplinary approach were compared. A chi square test was used for comparing the groups in the two periods; 2010-2014 versus 2015-2019 vs. P-values are reported according to two- tailed analysis, and p- values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results From 2010 to December 2019, 144 patients were assessed for β-cell replacement therapy eligibility. Out of all patients referred, 64 out of 79 (81%) and 22 out of 65 (34%) were listed for transplantation before and after the multidisciplinary assessment was introduced (p-value < 0.005). The main reasons for not being listed after the introduction of a multidisciplinary team were suboptimal diabetes treatment and that the patients withdrew their interest after the outpatient clinic visit with thorough information about advantages and risks. Conclusion The rate of patients who were accepted for islet or single pancreas transplantation declined after a multidisciplinary approach was introduced for transplant candidate eligibility. We suggest that a broader, multi-disciplinary approach revealed previously undetected medical issues and improved patient information that subsequently resulted in fewer patients listed for transplantation.


2011 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 395-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cyrus Jahansouz ◽  
Sean C. Kumer ◽  
Michael Ellenbogen ◽  
Kenneth L. Brayman

Author(s):  
Cyril P Landstra ◽  
Axel Andres ◽  
Mikael Chetboun ◽  
Caterina Conte ◽  
Yvonne Kelly ◽  
...  

Abstract Context The Igls criteria were developed to provide a consensus definition for outcomes of β-cell replacement therapy in the treatment of diabetes during a January 2017 workshop sponsored by the International Pancreas & Islet Transplant Association (IPITA) and the European Pancreas & Islet Transplant Association (EPITA). In July 2019, a symposium at the 17 th IPITA World Congress was held to examine the Igls criteria after two years in clinical practice, including validation against continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-derived glucose targets, and to propose future refinements that would allow for comparison of outcomes with artificial pancreas system approaches. Evidence acquisition Utilization of the criteria in various clinical and research settings were illustrated by population as well as individual outcome data of four islet and/or pancreas transplant centers. Validation against CGM metrics was conducted in 55 islet transplant recipients followed-up to 10 years from a fifth center. Evidence synthesis The Igls criteria provided meaningful clinical assessment on an individual patient and treatment group level, allowing for comparison both within and between different β-cell replacement modalities. Important limitations include the need to account for changes in insulin requirements and C-peptide levels relative to baseline. In islet transplant recipients, CGM glucose time-in-range improved with each category of increasing β-cell graft function. Conclusions Future Igls 2.0 criteria should consider absolute rather than relative levels of insulin use and C-peptide as qualifiers with treatment success based on glucose assessment using CGM-metrics on par with assessment of HbA1c and severe hypoglycemia events.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document