islet transplant
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

199
(FIVE YEARS 34)

H-INDEX

28
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2022 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris J. Callaghan ◽  
Lisa Mumford ◽  
Rebecca M. K. Curtis ◽  
Sarah V. Williams ◽  
Heather Whitaker ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Sophie Walker ◽  
Mahesh Appari ◽  
Shareen Forbes

Islet transplantation is a treatment for selected adults with Type 1 diabetes and severe hypoglycemia. Islets from two or more donor pancreases, a scarce resource, are usually required to impact on glycemic control but the treatment falls short of a cure. Islets are avascular when transplanted into the hypoxic liver environment and subjected to inflammatory insults, immune attack and toxicity from systemic immunosuppression. The Collaborative Islet Transplant Registry with outcome data on over 1000 islet transplant recipients has demonstrated that larger islet numbers transplanted and older age of recipient are associated with better outcomes. Induction with T cell depleting agents and the TNF-α inhibitor Etanercept and maintenance systemic immunosuppression with mTOR inhibitors in combination with calcineurin inhibitors also appear advantageous, but concerns remain over immunosuppressive toxicity. We discuss strategies and therapeutics which address specific challenges of islet transplantation, many of which are at the pre-clinical stage of development. On the horizon are adjuvant cell therapies with mesenchymal stromal cells and regulatory T cells that have been used in preclinical models and in humans in other contexts; such a strategy may enable reductions in immunosuppression in the early peri-transplant period when the islets are vulnerable to apoptosis. Human embryonic stem-cell derived islets are in early phase clinical trials and hold the promise of an inexhaustible supply of insulin producing cells; effective encapsulation of such cells or, silencing of the HLA complex would eliminate the need for immunosuppression, enabling this therapy to be used in all those with Type 1 diabetes.


Biology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 1349
Author(s):  
Rossana Caldara ◽  
Paola Maffi ◽  
Sabrina Costa ◽  
Elena Bazzigaluppi ◽  
Cristina Brigatti ◽  
...  

Background: Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients may be at increased risk for severe disease and mortality from COVID-19 because of immunosuppression and prolonged end-stage organ disease. As a transplant center serving a diverse patient population, we report the cumulative incidence and outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection in our cohort of SOT recipients. Methods: We prospectively included in this observational study SOT recipients with a functioning kidney (n = 201), pancreas ± kidney (n = 66) or islet transplant (n = 24), attending outpatient regular follow-up at the San Raffaele Hospital from February 2020 to April 2021. Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 were tested in all patients by a luciferase immunoprecipitation system assay. Results: Of the 291 SOT recipients, 30 (10.3%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 during the study period and prevalence was not different among different transplants. The SARS-CoV-2 antibody frequency was around 2.6-fold higher than the incidence of cases who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR. As for the WHO COVID-19 severity classification, 19 (63.3%) SOT recipients were mild, nine (30%) were moderate, and two were critical and died yielding a crude mortality rate in our patient population of 6.7%. Kidney transplant (OR 12.9 (1.1–150) p = 0.041) was associated with an increased risk for moderate/critical disease, while statin therapy (OR 0.116 (0.015–0.926) p = 0.042) and pancreas/islet transplant (OR 0.077 (0.007–0.906) p = 0.041) were protective. Conclusions: The incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in SOT recipients may be higher than previously described. Due to the relative high crude mortality, symptomatic SOT recipients must be considered at high risk in case of SARS-CoV-2 infection.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-Chun Chen ◽  
Agnieszka M. Klimek-Abercrombie ◽  
Kathryn J. Potter ◽  
Lindsay P. Pallo ◽  
Galina Soukhatcheva ◽  
...  

Autologous pancreatic islet transplantation is an established therapy for patients with chronic pancreatitis. However, the long-term transplant outcomes are modest. Identifying indicators of graft function will aid the preservation of transplanted islets and glycemic control. To this end, we analyzed beta cell prohormone peptide levels in a retrospective cohort of total pancreatectomy autologous islet transplant patients (n=28). Proinsulin-to-C-peptide (PI/C) and proIAPP-to-total IAPP (proIAPP/IAPP) ratios measured at 3 months post-transplant were significantly higher in patients who remained insulin dependent at 1 year follow-up. In a mouse model of human islet transplantation, recipient mice that later became hyperglycemic displayed significantly higher PI/C ratios than mice that remained normoglycemic. Histological analysis of islet grafts showed reduced insulin- and proinsulin-positive area, but elevated glucagon-positive area in grafts that experienced greater secretory demand. Increased prohormone convertase 1/3 was detected in glucagon-positive cells, and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) area was elevated in grafts from mice that displayed hyperglycemia or elevated plasma PI/C ratio, demonstrating intra-islet incretin production in metabolically challenged human islet grafts. These data indicate that in failing grafts, alpha cell prohormone processing is likely altered, and incomplete beta cell prohormone processing may be an early indicator of insulin dependency.


Author(s):  
Shareen Forbes ◽  
Anneliese J. Flatt ◽  
Denise Bennett ◽  
Robert Crookston ◽  
Mirka Pimkova ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glenn M. Ward ◽  
Jacqueline M. Walters ◽  
Judith L. Gooley ◽  
Raymond C. Boston

The authors’ perspective is described regarding modifications made in their clinic to glucose challenge protocols and mathematical models in order to estimate insulin secretion, insulin sensitivity and glucose effectiveness in patients living with Insulin-Requiring Diabetes and patients who received Pancreatic Islet Transplants to treat Type I diabetes (T1D) with Impaired Awareness of Hypoglycemia. The evolutions are described of protocols and models for use in T1D, and Insulin-Requiring Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) that were the basis for studies in the Islet Recipients. In each group, the need for modifications, and how the protocols and models were adapted is discussed. How the ongoing application of the adaptations is clarifying the Islet pathophysiology in the Islet Transplant Recipients is outlined.


Author(s):  
Cyril P Landstra ◽  
Axel Andres ◽  
Mikael Chetboun ◽  
Caterina Conte ◽  
Yvonne Kelly ◽  
...  

Abstract Context The Igls criteria were developed to provide a consensus definition for outcomes of β-cell replacement therapy in the treatment of diabetes during a January 2017 workshop sponsored by the International Pancreas & Islet Transplant Association (IPITA) and the European Pancreas & Islet Transplant Association (EPITA). In July 2019, a symposium at the 17 th IPITA World Congress was held to examine the Igls criteria after two years in clinical practice, including validation against continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-derived glucose targets, and to propose future refinements that would allow for comparison of outcomes with artificial pancreas system approaches. Evidence acquisition Utilization of the criteria in various clinical and research settings were illustrated by population as well as individual outcome data of four islet and/or pancreas transplant centers. Validation against CGM metrics was conducted in 55 islet transplant recipients followed-up to 10 years from a fifth center. Evidence synthesis The Igls criteria provided meaningful clinical assessment on an individual patient and treatment group level, allowing for comparison both within and between different β-cell replacement modalities. Important limitations include the need to account for changes in insulin requirements and C-peptide levels relative to baseline. In islet transplant recipients, CGM glucose time-in-range improved with each category of increasing β-cell graft function. Conclusions Future Igls 2.0 criteria should consider absolute rather than relative levels of insulin use and C-peptide as qualifiers with treatment success based on glucose assessment using CGM-metrics on par with assessment of HbA1c and severe hypoglycemia events.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document