CME Information current and emerging trends in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer and advanced gastric cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 5
2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 766-766
Author(s):  
Jung Han Kim ◽  
Hyun Joo Jang ◽  
Hyeong Su Kim ◽  
Hun Ho Song ◽  
Dae Young Zang

766 Background: The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Guidelines version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) adopted a total of five target lesions to be measured, with a maximum of two lesions per organ. To the best of our knowledge, the criterion of two target lesions per organ in the RECIST 1.1 is arbitrary and has not been supported by any objective evidence. We hypothesized that measuring the single largest lesion in each organ (modified RECIST 1.1; mRECIST 1.1) might show almost the same response classification as measuring two target lesions per organ (RECIST 1.1). Methods: We compared tumor responses according to the modified RECIST 1.1 and RECIST 1.1 using computed tomography in patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC) or colorectal cancer (CRC) who received a first-line chemotherapy. Results: A total of 89 patients who had at least two target lesions in any organ according to the RECIST 1.1 were included: 51 with GC and 38 with CRC. Regardless of the primary sites, the number of target lesions according to the modified RECIST 1.1 was significantly lower than that according to the RECIST 1.1 (p < 0.001). The assessment of tumor responses showed a high concordance between the two criteria, with a kappa value of 0.906 (95% CI, 0.826-0.986). Only five patients (5.6%) showed disagreement in the tumor response assessment between the two criteria: 3 in GC and 2 in CRC. Four patients showed disagreement between PR and SD, and one showed disagreement between SD and PD. The overall response rates of chemotherapy, which were calculated regardless of the primary sites and anti-cancer treatment, were not significantly different between the two criteria (42.7% versus 42.7%, p = 1.0) (Table). Conclusions: The modified RECIST 1.1, with a decreased number of target lesions, was comparable to the original RECIST 1.1 in the assessment of tumor response in patients with advanced GC or CRC. Our results suggest that it may be possible to measure the single largest lesion per organ for assessing tumor response. [Table: see text]


2015 ◽  
Vol 125 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-23
Author(s):  
Jerzy Mielko ◽  
Bogumila Ciaseł ◽  
Magdalena Skórzewska ◽  
Robert Sitarz ◽  
Andrzej Kurylcio ◽  
...  

Abstract Effective treatment of peritoneal surface neoplasms is possible through the simultaneous use of cytoreductive surgery with intraperitoneal chemotherapy in hyperthermia. It is successfully performed in patients with peritoneal pseudomyxoma, mesothelioma, as well as a limited and resectable peritoneal carcinomatosis in the course of colorectal cancer. It can also be used in patients with gastric or ovarian cancer but also metastatic colorectal cancer or metastases to the ovaries from gastric cancer. Aggressive surgical management of patients with primary or secondary neoplasms of the peritoneal surface was initiated by Sugarbaker’s research group.


2010 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 191-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuhide Iwakawa ◽  
Hitoshi Inoue ◽  
Hidenori Kiyochi ◽  
Shinsuke Kajiwara ◽  
Manabu Nishie ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document