Tumor response assessment by measuring the single largest lesion per organ in patients with advanced gastric cancer or colorectal cancer.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 766-766
Author(s):  
Jung Han Kim ◽  
Hyun Joo Jang ◽  
Hyeong Su Kim ◽  
Hun Ho Song ◽  
Dae Young Zang

766 Background: The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Guidelines version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) adopted a total of five target lesions to be measured, with a maximum of two lesions per organ. To the best of our knowledge, the criterion of two target lesions per organ in the RECIST 1.1 is arbitrary and has not been supported by any objective evidence. We hypothesized that measuring the single largest lesion in each organ (modified RECIST 1.1; mRECIST 1.1) might show almost the same response classification as measuring two target lesions per organ (RECIST 1.1). Methods: We compared tumor responses according to the modified RECIST 1.1 and RECIST 1.1 using computed tomography in patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC) or colorectal cancer (CRC) who received a first-line chemotherapy. Results: A total of 89 patients who had at least two target lesions in any organ according to the RECIST 1.1 were included: 51 with GC and 38 with CRC. Regardless of the primary sites, the number of target lesions according to the modified RECIST 1.1 was significantly lower than that according to the RECIST 1.1 (p < 0.001). The assessment of tumor responses showed a high concordance between the two criteria, with a kappa value of 0.906 (95% CI, 0.826-0.986). Only five patients (5.6%) showed disagreement in the tumor response assessment between the two criteria: 3 in GC and 2 in CRC. Four patients showed disagreement between PR and SD, and one showed disagreement between SD and PD. The overall response rates of chemotherapy, which were calculated regardless of the primary sites and anti-cancer treatment, were not significantly different between the two criteria (42.7% versus 42.7%, p = 1.0) (Table). Conclusions: The modified RECIST 1.1, with a decreased number of target lesions, was comparable to the original RECIST 1.1 in the assessment of tumor response in patients with advanced GC or CRC. Our results suggest that it may be possible to measure the single largest lesion per organ for assessing tumor response. [Table: see text]

2018 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. 88-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Inno ◽  
Giuseppe Lo Russo ◽  
Matteo Salgarello ◽  
Giulia Corrao ◽  
Raffaella Casolino ◽  
...  

The objective response is an important endpoint to evaluate clinical activity of new anticancer drugs. Standardized criteria for evaluating response are needed for comparing results of different trials and represent the basis for advances in cancer therapy. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 are the most used in clinical practice and in clinical trials; however, they are not able to capture atypical responses seen with immunotherapy drugs. We describe the evolution of response criteria with a special focus on the immune-related criteria.


2016 ◽  
Vol 113 (4) ◽  
pp. 443-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olaguoke Akinwande ◽  
Prejesh Philips ◽  
Charles R. Scoggins ◽  
Lawrence Kelly ◽  
Cliff Tatum ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document