O104 A novel chromogenic medium for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis detection

ABSTRACTEnterococcus faecalisandEnterococcus faeciumare frequently resistant to vancomycin and β-lactams. In enterococcal infections with reduced glycopeptide susceptibility, combination therapy is often administered. Our objective was to conduct pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) models to evaluate β-lactam synergy with daptomycin (DAP) against resistant enterococci. OneE. faecalisstrain (R6981) and twoE. faeciumstrains (R6370 and 8019) were evaluated. DAP MICs were obtained. All strains were evaluated for response to LL37, an antimicrobial peptide, in the presence and absence of ceftaroline (CPT), ertapenem (ERT), and ampicillin (AMP). After 96 h,in vitromodels were run simulating 10 mg DAP/kg body weight/day, 600 mg CPT every 8 h (q8h), 2 g AMP q4h, and 1 g ERT q24h, both alone and in combination against all strains. DAP MICs were 2, 4, and 4 μg/ml for strains R6981, R6370, and 8019, respectively. PK/PD models demonstrated bactericidal activity with DAP-CPT, DAP-AMP, and DAP-ERT combinations against strain 8019 (P< 0.001 and log10CFU/ml reduction of >2 compared to any single agent). Against strains R6981 and R6370, the DAP-AMP combination demonstrated enhancement against R6370 but not R6981, while the combinations of DAP-CPT and DAP-ERT were bactericidal, demonstrated enhancement, and were statistically superior to all other regimens at 96 h (P< 0.001) against both strains. CPT, ERT, and AMP similarly augmented LL37 killing against strain 8019. In strains R6981 and R6370, CPT and ERT aided LL37 more than AMP (P< 0.001). Compared to DAP alone, combination regimens provide better killing and prevent resistance. Clinical research involving DAP combinations is warranted.

Download Full-text

Epidemiology of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis Colonization in Nursing Facilities

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofz553 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (1) ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Elyse Davis ◽

Liam Hicks ◽

Ihsan Ali ◽

Elizabeth Salzman ◽

Joyce Wang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Enterococcus Faecalis ◽

Enterococcus Faecium ◽

Multinomial Logistic Regression ◽

Incidence Rates ◽

Vancomycin Resistant Enterococcus ◽

Nursing Facilities ◽

Logistic Regression Models ◽

Vancomycin Resistant ◽

Device Use ◽

Incident Cases

Abstract Background Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis frequently colonize nursing facility (NF) residents, creating opportunities for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) transmission and dissemination of mobile genetic elements conferring antimicrobial resistance. Most VRE studies do not speciate; our study addresses this lack and compares the epidemiology of E faecium and E faecalis. Methods We enrolled 651 newly admitted patients from 6 different NFs and collected swabs from several body sites at enrollment, 14 days, 30 days, and monthly thereafter for up to 6 months. The VRE were speciated using a duplex polymerase chain reaction. We used multinomial logistic regression models to compare risk factors associated with colonization of E faecium and E faecalis. Results Overall, 40.7% were colonized with E faecium, E faecalis, or both. At enrollment, more participants were colonized with E faecium (17.8%) than E faecalis (8.4%); 3.2% carried both species. Enterococcus faecium was carried twice as long as E faecalis (69 days and 32 days, respectively), but incidence rates were similar (E faecium, 3.9/1000 person-days vs E faecalis, 4.1/1000 person-days). Length of stay did not differ by species among incident cases. Residents who used antibiotics within the past 30 days had a greater incidence of both E faecium (odds ratio [OR] = 2.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.82–4.60) and E faecalis (OR = 1.80; 95% CI, 1.16–2.80); device use was most strongly associated with the incidence of E faecium colonization (OR = 2.01; 95% CI, 1.15–3.50). Conclusions Recent increases in vancomycin-resistant E faecium prevalence may reflect increased device use and longer duration of carriage.

Download Full-text