Phase II study of IV RMP-7 + carboplatin in recurrent malignant glioma who grade III–IV previously treated with chemotherapy

1997 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. S201
Author(s):  
A. Gregor ◽  
C. Lebrun-Frénay ◽  
C. Osbom
Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2827-2827
Author(s):  
Boris Böll ◽  
Teresa Halbsguth ◽  
Helen Görgen ◽  
Henning Bredenfeld ◽  
Hans Eich ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2827 About 20% of all patients diagnosed with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) are older than 60 years. These patients have a rather poor prognosis, particularly when presenting in intermediate or advanced stages. Besides a biologically more aggressive disease, the main reason is a drastically increased toxicity of chemo- and radiotherapy resulting in a higher treatment-related mortality and insufficient dosing of the applied treatment. In the GHSG-HD9 trial, elderly patients did not benefit from the BEACOPP regimen in terms of overall survival due to a high toxicity related death rate. In order to improve tolerability, the PVAG regimen (prednisone, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and gemcitabine) was developed. This is a modification of the ABVD regimen in which bleomycin and dacarbazine were replaced by prednisone and gemcitabine. Here we report for the first time on the final analysis of this multi-center phase II study for elderly HL patients. 61 patients were recruited between 2004 and 2007. 2 patients were excluded due to histology review not confirming HL, resulting in 59 patients with intermediate- or advanced-stage HL aged between 60 and 75 years. Treatment consisted of 6 cycles PVAG in patients achieving a complete remission (CR) after 4 cycles or 8 cycles PVAG in case of partial remission (PR) after 4 cycles. Patients who did not achieve CR after the end of chemotherapy received additional radiotherapy. Primary endpoints were administration of adequate dose without excessive delays, and response rate 3 months after end of treatment. Secondary endpoints included WHO grade III/IV toxicities, and occurrence of early progression. 59 patients with a median age of 68 years were evaluated, of which 59% were male and 93% had advanced stage disease. The relative dose intensity (relative dose divided by relative chemotherapy duration) was at least 80% in 44 patients (76%). Regarding the single cycles, of which 85% started without major delay (max. 1 day), the mean relative dose of all agents was slightly decreasing over time but always exceeded 90%. WHO grade III/IV toxicities were documented in 43 patients (75%). Only 3 patients terminated CT because of excessive toxicity. 10 Patients (17%) received consolidating radiotherapy. In total, 46 patients responded with CR/CRu (78%; 95% CI: 65% to 88%), 2 with PR (3%), 2 with no change (3%) and 4 with progressive disease (7%). 3 patients died before restaging with unknown response and in 2 patients treatment outcome is unknown. With a median observation time of 37 months, 6 patients (10%) had progressive disease and 9 patients (15%) relapsed. In total, 10 patients died from relapsing or progressing HL, 2 from second malignancies (one of lung cancer after 23 months, and one of AML after 25 months) and 5 patients due to other reasons. Overall 17 patients (29%, 95% CI: 18% to 42%) have died so far. In conclusion, PVAG is safe and feasible in Hodgkin patients older than 60. The PFS indicates activity of this regimen in this poor prognosis patient cohort. However, a controlled randomized trial to determine the best treatment in this patient population is warranted. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00147875. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (suppl_6) ◽  
pp. vi11-vi11
Author(s):  
Daniel O’Connell ◽  
Jose Carrillo ◽  
Xiao-Tang Kong ◽  
Beverly Fu ◽  
Daniela Bota

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (8) ◽  
pp. 889 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Lou Affronti ◽  
Jennifer Gamboa Jackman ◽  
Frances McSherry ◽  
James E. Herndon ◽  
Elwood C. Massey ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii97-iii97
Author(s):  
V Villani ◽  
A Pace ◽  
A Vidiri ◽  
A Tanzilli ◽  
F Sperati ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Patients with relapse of recurrent glioma have a poor outcome and limited treatment options. The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical benefit and tolerability of weekly intravenous administration of carboplatin-based monotherapy in adult glioma patients who had progressed from previous chemotherapy lines based on temozolomide and nitrosoureas MATERIAL AND METHODS This was a single arm, Phase II study. Eligibility criteria included progressive or recurrent malignant glioma after radiotherapy and chemotherapy-based treatments and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) > 60. RESULTS Thirty-two patients (median age: 43.5 y) were enrolled to receive weekly carboplatin monotherapy in intravenous mode of administration. The median duration of response was 7.3 months with an overall disease control rate of 31.3%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.3 months while overall survival (OS) was 5.5 months. Patients achieving clinical benefit exhibited a longer PFS (4.6 vs 1.5 months; p>0.001) and OS (7.9 vs 3.2 months; p=0.041) compared to those not achieving clinical benefit. CONCLUSION Our findings show that single agent, weekly, intravenous carboplatin may have a role in the treatment patients with recurrent malignant glioma


2012 ◽  
Vol 42 (10) ◽  
pp. 887-895 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Nagane ◽  
R. Nishikawa ◽  
Y. Narita ◽  
H. Kobayashi ◽  
S. Takano ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 101 (12) ◽  
pp. 1986-1994 ◽  
Author(s):  
D A Reardon ◽  
A Desjardins ◽  
J J Vredenburgh ◽  
S Gururangan ◽  
J H Sampson ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2022-2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. N. Rich ◽  
A. Desjardins ◽  
S. Sathornsumetee ◽  
J. J. Vredenburgh ◽  
J. A. Quinn ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii175-ii175
Author(s):  
Mallika Patel ◽  
Katherine Peters ◽  
Eric Lipp ◽  
Justin Low ◽  
James Herndon ◽  
...  

Abstract INTRODUCTION Malignant glioma (MG) patients often experience chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Olanzapine has recently been added to national anti-emesis guidelines for patients on moderately/highly emetogenic chemotherapy. In this retrospective study, we investigated the use of olanzapine for refractory-CINV (R-CINV) in MG patients. METHODS In this chart review, we queried adult MG patients with KPS ≥ 70 who received olanzapine from January 2019-March 2020. Patients were included if they were prescribed olanzapine for CINV. Data on nausea/vomiting improvement, olanzapine dosing/schedule, number of refractory anti-emetic trials, concomitant corticosteroid use, and demographics were collected. RESULTS We identified 21 MG patients who were prescribed olanzapine, with 9 of those patients receiving olanzapine specifically for CINV. Seven patients had WHO grade IV glioma, and 2 patients had anaplastic astrocytoma (WHO grade III). Five of 9 patients (55.6%) were male, all were Caucasian and median age was 54 years. Patients tried an average of 3 anti-emetics prior to initiating olanzapine for R-CINV. Only one patient was taking concomitant corticosteroids; which is not in concordance with national anti-emesis guidelines. Four of 9 patients (44.4%) achieved control of R-CINV with olanzapine. The olanzapine dose and key biomarkers (IDH-status, MGMT promoter methylation) were similar between those experiencing R-CINV and those without symptoms. CONCLUSIONS In this study, we find that approximately half of patients with R-CINV achieved improved nausea and vomiting control with the addition of olanzapine. The lack of corticosteroid use for anti-emesis in MG continues to make this population challenging to manage. The relatively high success rate in patients that had failed, on average, 3 anti-emetics, suggests that olanzapine may be a potent addition to the anti-emetic toolkit for MG patients. These results inspire further large-scale research to validate this observation and define the optimal role for olanzapine in treating R-CINV in MG patients.


2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (16_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1515-1515 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. S. Friedman ◽  
J. Quinn ◽  
J. Rich ◽  
J. Vredenburgh ◽  
A. Desjardins ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document