oral etoposide
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

489
(FIVE YEARS 29)

H-INDEX

35
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jess Fraser ◽  
Fahmina Fardus‐Reid ◽  
Lucy Irvine ◽  
Lucy Elliss‐Brookes ◽  
Lorna Fern ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. e242485
Author(s):  
Maria Alejandra Mendoza ◽  
Sunil Iyer ◽  
Jose F. Camargo ◽  
Pasquale W. Benedetto

Two patients receiving oral etoposide therapy developed Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia during chemotherapy with significant lymphopenia without corticosteroid use. In this commentary we discuss cellular mechanisms by which etoposide induced CD4+ T lymphocyte dysfunction and reduced survival may lead to predisposition to P. jirovecii infection.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13070-e13070
Author(s):  
Agnieszka I. Jagiello-Gruszfeld ◽  
Malgorzata Meluch ◽  
Michal Kunkiel ◽  
Anna Gorniak ◽  
Anna Majstrak-Hulewska ◽  
...  

e13070 Background: Patients with metastatic breast cancer can derive clinical benefit from several subsequent lines of chemotherapy. However, in heavily pre-treated patients, agents with clinical activity, a favourable side effects profile and a convenient administration modality are preferred. Oral etoposide may be an interesting treatment option in this group of patients. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study performed in single institution in 22 patients with MBC refractory to prior anthracycline, taxane, and capecitabine therapy. All patients were treated with oral etoposide at 50 mg/day on days 1-20. Treatment cycles were repeated every 28 days. Results: The median age were 53 years (42-68). The median number of previous chemotherapy lines was 5 (range 2-7). There were no complete or partial responses. Median PFS was 7 months. In 5 patients, the disease stabilized for over 12 months. Interestingly, etoposide activity was unrelated to the number of previous lines and type of metastatic involvement. Oral etoposide was well tolerated with only one patients discontinuing therapy due to toxicity. Conclusions: In real practice oral etoposide is a valuable and safe option for pre-treated metastatic breast cancer patients and might be considered in patients failing other approaches, but still suitable for chemotherapy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nanlin Hu ◽  
Anjie Zhu ◽  
Yiran Si ◽  
Jian Yue ◽  
Xue Wang ◽  
...  

IntroductionWe performed this clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apatinib and oral etoposide in patients with HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC).MethodsPatients with HER2-negative MBC previously treated with anthracycline and taxanes and failed ≥1 prior chemotherapy regimens were recruited. The starting dose of apatinib was 500 and 425 mg in patients with ECOG scores of 0–1 and 2, respectively. The etoposide capsules were given at 50 mg/m2 on days 1 to 10 for 21 days. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety.ResultsThirty-one eligible patients were enrolled. The median follow-up time was 11 months. The median PFS for all patients was 6.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 6.0–7.9], and 6.9 months (95% CI 5.3–8.6) and 6.6 months (95% CI 1.4–11.7) for patients with apatinib 425 and 500mg once daily, respectively. The ORR was 35.5% (11/31). The DCR was 87.1% (27/31). The median OS was 20.4 months (95% CI 11.4–29.3). The median PFS of patients who had hypertension and proteinuria was longer than that for those without hypertension and proteinuria. The most common grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs were hypertension (12/31, 38.7%), fatigue (3/31, 9.7%), thrombocytopenia (3/31, 9.7%).ConclusionApatinib combined with etoposide capsules is effective and tolerable in heavily pretreated, metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer patients. A lower apatinib dose provide equivalent efficacy and reduced toxicity.Clinical Trial Registrationhttps://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT03535961.


BMC Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Huang ◽  
Chuanbo Xie ◽  
Jie Tang ◽  
Wenzhuo He ◽  
Fan Yang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted therapy is effective in patients with ovarian cancer. Whether adipose tissue (AT) could predict the efficacy of VEGF receptor (VEGFR) inhibitors in ovarian cancer is unknown. We aimed to evaluate the ability of distinct AT depots to predict the efficacy of apatinib, a VEGFR inhibitor, in recurrent ovarian cancers included in the AEROC trial. Methods The AEROC was a single-arm phase 2 trial of apatinib and oral etoposide in patients with platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory ovarian cancer. Apatinib was administered continuously, and oral etoposide was administered every 21 days for a maximum of six cycles. This was a post hoc study based on the AEROC trial. Areas of visceral AT (VAT), subcutaneous AT (SAT), and intermuscular AT (IMAT) were measured using computed tomography scan at baseline to assess their association with the objective response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Results Of the 35 treated patients, 31 patients with at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment by computed tomography scan were included in this study. After adjusting for apatinib exposure, high VAT (odds ratio [OR], 0.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03–0.90, P = 0.037) and SAT (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.03–0.87, P = 0.034) were significantly associated with a higher objective response rate. Further, decreased risks of disease progression and death were associated with high VAT (hazard ratio [HR], 0.39; 95% CI, 0.17–0.92, P = 0.031, and HR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.04–0.40, P < 0.001, respectively), SAT (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.15–0.83, P = 0.027, and HR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.08–0.67, P = 0.007, respectively), and IMAT (HR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.06–0.74, P = 0.016, and HR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.03–0.62, P = 0.011, respectively). Conclusions High areas of VAT, SAT, and IMAT were significantly associated with better outcomes in patients with platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory ovarian cancer who received VEGFR inhibitors. AT assessments may be valuable as patient-specific imaging biomarkers for predicting response to VEGFR inhibitors. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02867956.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document