Biomass energy use at the household level in two villages of bangladesh: assessment of field methods

1998 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.N. Bari ◽  
D.O. Hall ◽  
N.J.D. Lucas ◽  
S.M.A. Hossain
2013 ◽  
pp. 143-146
Author(s):  
Orsolya Nagy

The use of renewable energies has a long past, even though its share of the total energy use is rather low in European terms. However, the tendencies are definitely favourable which is further strengthened by the dedication of the European Union to sustainable development and combat against climate change. The European Union is on the right track in achieving its goal which is to be able to cover 20% its energy need from renewable energy resources by 2020. The increased use of wind, solar, water, tidal, geothermal and biomass energy will reduce the energy import dependence of the European Union and it will stimulate innovation.


Energy ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.C. Bhattacharya ◽  
P. Abdul Salam ◽  
Mahen Sharma

1998 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 513-535 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fritz Breuss ◽  
Karl Steininger

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 207-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas W. Davis ◽  
Alan Fuchs ◽  
Paul Gertler

This paper evaluates a large-scale appliance replacement program in Mexico that from 2009 to 2012 helped 1.9 million households replace their old refrigerators and air conditioners with energy-efficient models. Using household-level billing records from  the universe of Mexican residential customers, we find that refrigerator replacement reduces electricity consumption by 8 percent, about one-quarter of what was predicted by ex ante analyses. Moreover, we find that air conditioning replacement actually increases electricity consumption. Overall, we find that the program is an expensive way to reduce externalities from energy use, reducing carbon dioxide emissions at a program cost of over $500 per ton. (JEL L68, L94, O12, O13, Q41, Q54)


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuyang Chen

Abstract Despite the significant impacts of technology on the socioeconomic effects of climate policies, many previous researchers neglected the induced technical impacts and thus resulted in biased evaluations of climate policies. Hence, it is important that the induced technology should be endogenized in the policy evaluation framework. In this paper, I attempt to use a Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model to quantify the technical impacts of the Chinese carbon tax. The technical impacts are denoted by the induced technological change (ITC), which is a function of the energy-use efficiency (EUE), energy-production efficiency (EPE), and nonenergy-production efficiency (ENE). The carbon tax will increase the energy cost share because the of the internalisation of the abatement costs. This paper empirically shows that the carbon tax will decrease the energy cost share and production efficiency but increase the energy use and nonenergy production efficiency. Overall, the carbon tax will promote the technological development, compared to the baseline scenario. In addition to the policy effects of the tax, the ITC will decrease the energy use and production efficiency but increase the nonenergy production efficiency. The ITC will increase the RGDP, decrease the household welfare, and increase the average social cost of carbon (ASCC). To summarise, despite that the carbon tax will decrease the welfare at the country and household level, the ITC of the carbon tax will increase the welfare at the country level but decrease the welfare at the household level. Under the ITC impacts, the emission abatement will become costlier.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document