Atrial amyloidosis. An arrhythmogenic substrate for persistent atrial fibrillation

2003 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 86-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Rocken ◽  
B. Peters ◽  
G. Juenemann
2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
W.F.B Van Der Does ◽  
A Heida ◽  
L.J.M.E Van Der Does ◽  
A.J.J.C Bogers ◽  
N.M.S De Groot

Abstract Background/Introduction The classification of atrial fibrillation (AF) currently is based on clinical characteristics, however classifying underlying electropathology would assist in selecting appropriate therapy. In this study, we measured atrial conduction parameters in sinus rhythm (SR) using an intra-operative high resolution epicardial mapping approach in paroxysmal (PAF) and persistent AF (persAF) patients. Purpose To study whether the clinical classification is related to the amount and severity of conduction disorders in SR. Methods We included 47 PAF and 24 persAF patients for intra-operative measurements of SR at the right atrium (RA), Bachmann's Bundle (BB), the left atrium (LA) and the pulmonary vein area (PV). Various conduction parameters were calculated, including number of continuous conduction delay and block (cCDCB) lines, total activation time (TAT), and orientation of conduction block (CB) lines at BB. Results After adjustment for confounders, only TAT of BB was significantly longer in persAF patients, 75 [53–92] ms vs 55 [40–76] ms. This can be attributed to more CB line parts orientated perpendicular to the conduction direction and a higher number of cCDCB lines. Other conduction characteristics at BB and other atrial areas showed no difference between PAF and persAF patients. Conclusion(s) Patients with persAF have a longer activation time at BB compared to patients with PAF. Other conduction parameters show significant overlap between these groups at BB and in other atrial areas, suggesting that, in SR, the clinical classification does not match the arrhythmogenic substrate. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


Cardiology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 143 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 107-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naseer Ahmed ◽  
Shahida Perveen ◽  
Adeela Mehmood ◽  
Gulab Fatima Rani ◽  
Giulio Molon

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequent atrial arrhythmia. During the last few decades, owing to numerous advancements in the field of electrophysiology, we reached satisfactory outcomes for paroxysmal AF with the help of ablation procedures. But the most challenging type is still persistent AF. The recurrence rate of AF in patients with persistent AF is very high, which shows the inadequacy of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Over the last few decades, we have been trying to gain insight into AF mechanisms, and have come to the conclusion that there must be some triggers and substrates other than pulmonary veins. According to many studies, PVI alone is not enough to deal with persistent AF. The purpose of our review is to summarize updates and to clarify the role of coronary sinus (CS) in AF induction and propagation. This review will provide updated knowledge on developmental, histological, and macroscopic anatomical aspects of CS with its role as arrhythmogenic substrate. This review will also inform readers about application of CS in other electrophysiological procedures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document