Male sexual assault victims: a selective review of the literature and implications for support services

2002 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 203-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Davies
2000 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 432-437 ◽  
Author(s):  
A ERNST ◽  
E GREEN ◽  
M FERGUSON ◽  
S WEISS ◽  
W GREEN

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miriam Matthews ◽  
Coreen Farris ◽  
Margaret Tankard ◽  
Michael Dunbar

Sexual Health ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Templeton ◽  
Angela Williams

Colposcopic examination is considered the gold standard in child sexual abuse evaluations in Australia. However, there remain contentious issues with its use, especially in adult victims, which we sought to address by a review of the literature. Colposcopy has been shown to be a sensitive and acceptable tool for detection of anogenital abnormalities in children. The significance of some genital findings remains controversial, especially when images are interpreted by inexperienced clinicians. Its use in adult assessments is hampered by a lack of comparative studies on colposcopically detected genital injuries in adults following consensual v. non-consensual sexual intercourse. Further research is urgently needed before the use of colposcopy can be routinely recommended for adult victims.


2000 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 432-437
Author(s):  
Amy A. Ernst ◽  
Elaine Green ◽  
M.Troy Ferguson ◽  
Steven J. Weiss ◽  
William M. Green

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susmita Pati ◽  
Kyleen Hashim ◽  
Brett Brown ◽  
Alex Fiks ◽  
Christopher B. Forrest

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S521-S522
Author(s):  
Jennifer R Silva-Nash ◽  
Stacie Bordelon ◽  
Ryan K Dare ◽  
Sherrie Searcy

Abstract Background Nonoccupational post exposure prophylaxis (nPEP) following sexual assault can prevent HIV transmission. A standardized Emergency Department (ED) protocol for evaluation, treatment, and follow up for post assault victims was implemented to improve compliance with CDC nPEP guidelines. Methods A single-center observational study of post sexual assault patients before/after implementation of an ED nPEP protocol was conducted by comparing the appropriateness of prescriptions, labs, and necessary follow up. A standardized order-set based on CDC nPEP guidelines, with involvement of an HIV pharmacist and ID clinic, was implemented during the 2018-2019 academic year. Clinical data from pre-intervention period (07/2016-06/2017) was compared to post-intervention period (07/2018-08/2019) following a 1-year washout period. Results During the study, 147 post-sexual assault patients (59 Pre, 88 Post) were included. One hundred thirty-three (90.4%) were female, 68 (46.6%) were African American and 133 (90.4%) were candidates for nPEP. Median time to presentation following assault was 12.6 hours. nPEP was offered to 40 (67.8%) and 84 (95.5%) patients (P< 0.001) and ultimately prescribed to 29 (49.2%) and 71 (80.7%) patients (P< 0.001) in pre and post periods respectively. Renal function (37.3% vs 88.6%; P< 0.001), pregnancy (39.0% vs 79.6%; P< 0.001), syphilis (3.4% vs 89.8%; P< 0.001), hepatitis B (15.3% vs 95.5%; P< 0.001) and hepatitis C (27.1% vs 94.3%) screening occurred more frequently during the post period. Labratory, nPEP Prescription and Follow up Details for Patients Prescribed nPEP Conclusion The standardization of an nPEP ED protocol for sexual assault victims resulted in increased nPEP administration, appropriateness of prescription, screening for other sexually transmitted infectious and scheduling follow up care. While guideline compliance dramatically improved, further interventions are likely warranted in this vulnerable population. Disclosures Ryan K. Dare, MD, MS, Accelerate Diagnostics, Inc (Research Grant or Support)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document