7020 Performance status and interval from first-line docetaxel-based chemotherapy to progression are significant prognostic factors in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer receiving second-line chemotherapy

2009 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 412
Author(s):  
Y. Loriot ◽  
C. Massard ◽  
M. Gross-Goupil ◽  
T. De La Motte Rouge ◽  
A. Bossi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Chemotherapy ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

Use of epirubicin, carboplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (ECarboF) as a second-line treatment in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 173-173
Author(s):  
U. B. McGovern ◽  
S. J. Harland
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Prostate Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
First Line ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Docetaxel Chemotherapy ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

173 Background: ECarboF chemotherapy is an active first line chemotherapy treatment for metastatic prostate cancer. We have now investigated its efficacy and toxicity in patients who have progressed during or after docetaxel chemotherapy. Methods: 37 patients with metastatic prostate cancer who had received ECarboF chemotherapy were retrospectively reviewed from a five year period (2005-2010). All patients had previously received first-line docetaxel chemotherapy and had either progressed following treatment (n=17) or were docetaxel refractory (n=20). Patients received epirubicin 50mg/m2 iv d1, carboplatin (AUC 5) d1, fluorouracil 440mg/m2 d1, d15 and folinic acid 20mg/m2 d1, d15 on a q4w cycle. 20% dose reductions were made for the first cycle in patients with poorer performance status. PSA was measured before each cycle of treatment and all patients were assessed for toxicity. Results: Patients had a median age of 70 years (range 48-77), median baseline PSA of 226.5 ng/mL (range 9.6-1,580) and the median number of ECarboF chemotherapy cycles received was 6 (range 1-10). 65% (n=24) of patients were ECOG 0-1, the remaining 35% (n=13) were ECOG 2-3. 16% (n=6) patients had a ≥ 30% decline in PSA and 16% (n=6) patients had a ≥ 50% decline in PSA. 35% (n=13) of patients experienced grade 3/4 toxicity, most commonly anaemia (13.5%), neutropenia (13.5%) and thrombocytopenia (8.1%) with one treatment related death (neutropenic sepsis) during the five year period analysed. Median time to PSA progression was 5.1 months. Conclusions: ECarboF has activity with acceptable toxicity post docetaxel in the treatment of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer. Although PSA response rates are modest, the time to progression is comparable to that of more toxic regimens. ECarboF should be considered as an active second-line chemotherapy regimen. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Prognostic factors in metastatic gastric cancer patients (pts) treated with second-line chemotherapy

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15169-15169
Author(s):  
V. Catalano ◽  
F. Graziano ◽  
D. Santini ◽  
A. M. Baldelli ◽  
P. Giordani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Chemotherapy ◽  
Metastatic Sites ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

15169 Background: Currently, there is no established second-line chemotherapy for pts with advanced gastric cancer who failed to respond or progressed after a first-line chemotherapy. Many of these pts still have a good performance status or have symptoms to be palliated at the time of first-line failure and are candidates for second-line chemotherapy. However, phase II trials demonstrate divergent results about pts more likely to benefit from second-line chemotherapy. We retrospectively analyzed the influence of various clinicopathologic factors on the survival of pts treated with second-line chemotherapy. Methods: Analysis is based on the data of 169 pts consecutively treated at 3 oncology department with a second-line chemotherapy. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine prognostic factors of survival. The variable used for analysis were: sex, age, ECOG performance status, a weight loss > 5 Kg in the last month; site of primary tumor, histopathology; hemoglobin, serum albumin, and CEA levels, number and site of metastatic disease, response to and time-to-progression (TTP) with the first- line chemotherapy. Results: The variables predictive of better survival were: ECOG PS 0–1 (p<0.001), no weight loss (p=0.001), hemoglobin level > 10 g/dl (p=0.01), CEA level <50 U/ml (p<0.02), number of metastatic sites = 2 (p=0.002), TTP of the first-line chemotherapy > 4 months (p=0.008). Peritoneal carcinomatosis was predictive of poor survival only when associated with one or more signs or symptoms as vomiting, anorexia, abdominal pain, ascites(p=0.03). Four factors were independently associated with better overall survival: ECOG PS 0–1 (p=0.002; HR 0.46; CI 95%, 0.29–0.75), CEA level <50 U/ml (p=0.008; HR 0.54; CI 95%, 0.35–0.85), one or two metastatic sites of disease (p=0.01; HR 0.58; CI 95%, 0.39–0.88), and TTP of the first-line chemotherapy > 4 months (p=0.02; HR 0.66; CI 95%, 0.45–0.95). Conclusions: In the absence of data deriving from randomized, controlled, clinical trials, this analysis suggests that some clinical factors may help clinicians to better select groups of pts with gastric cancer more likely to benefit from a second-line chemotherapy. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Second-line chemotherapy in castration-resistant prostate cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
S. V. Mishugin ◽  
T. N. Skvorstova ◽  
A. A. Gritskevich ◽  
D. A. Oskirko ◽  
I. G. Rusakov
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Second Line Chemotherapy ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

Optimal indications for second-line chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 105-105
Author(s):  
Hiroko Hasegawa ◽  
Kazumasa Fujitani ◽  
Shoichi Nakazuru ◽  
Motohiro Hirao ◽  
Eiji Mita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Chemotherapy ◽  
Clinicopathological Variables ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

105 Background: It remains uncertain whether every patient with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) who progresses after first-line chemotherapy should receive second-line chemotherapy. We conducted the present study to identify the optimal indications for second-line chemotherapy. Methods: In this retrospective study, 101 patients were included in univariate and multivariate analyses to identify clinicopathological variables independently associated with longer survival post progression (SPP), defined as the time from recognition of disease progression on first-line chemotherapy to death from any cause or last follow-up. Results: Median SPP of all patients was 340 days. On multivariate analysis, both performance status (PS) 2 (hazard ratio (HR), 14.234; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.766–73.258), serum albumin (Alb) level < 3.5 g/dl (HR, 2.088; 95% CI, 1.047–4.060) at initiation of second-line chemotherapy, and time to progression (TTP) < 170 days on first-line chemotherapy (HR, 2.497; 95% CI, 1.227–5.083) were identified as independent prognostic factors for shorter SPP. Median SPP was 496, 375, and 232 days in patients with 0, 1, and 2 of these 3 negative prognostic factors, respectively (p = 0.0002). Conclusions: The present study suggests that second-line chemotherapy would be less beneficial in patients with 2 or more of the following 3 negative prognostic factors: PS 2, Alb < 3.5 g/dl at initiation of second-line chemotherapy, and TTP < 170 days on first-line chemotherapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document