More accurate stress intensity factor derived by finite element analysis for the ISRM suggested rock fracture toughness specimen—CCNBD

Author(s):  
Q.Z. Wang ◽  
X.M. Jia ◽  
S.Q. Kou ◽  
Z.X. Zhang ◽  
P.-A. Lindqvist
Author(s):  
Curtis Sifford ◽  
Ali Shirani

Abstract This paper presents the application of the rules from ASME Section VIII, Division 3 of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code for a fracture mechanics evaluation to determine the damage tolerance and fatigue life of a flowline clamp connector. The guidelines from API 579-1 / ASME FFS-1 Fitness-For-Service for the stress analysis of a crack-like flaw have been considered for this assessment. The crack tip is modeled using a refined mesh around the crack tip that is referred to as a focused mesh approach in API 579-1 / ASME FFS-1. The driving force method is used as an alternative to the failure assessment diagram method to account for the influence of crack tip plasticity. The J integral is determined using elastic-plastic finite element analysis and converted to an equivalent stress intensity factor to be compared to the fracture toughness of the material. The fatigue life is calculated using the Paris Law equation and the stress intensity factor calculated from the finite element analysis. The allowable number of design cycles is determined using the safety factors required from Division 3 of the ASME Pressure Vessel Code.


Author(s):  
Curtis Sifford ◽  
Ali Shirani

This paper presents the application of the rules from ASME Section VIII, Division 3 of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code for a fracture mechanics evaluation to determine the damage tolerance and fatigue life of a flowline clamp connector. The guidelines from API 579-1 / ASME FFS-1 Fitness-For-Service for the stress analysis of a crack-like flaw have been considered for this assessment. The crack tip is modeled using a refined mesh around the crack tip that is referred to as a focused mesh approach in API 579-1 / ASME FFS-1. The driving force method is used as an alternative to the failure assessment diagram method to account for the influence of crack tip plasticity. The J integral is determined using elastic-plastic finite element analysis and converted to an equivalent stress intensity factor to be compared to the fracture toughness of the material. The fatigue life is calculated using the Paris Law equation and the stress intensity factor calculated from the finite element analysis. The allowable number of design cycles is determined using the safety factors required from Division 3 of the ASME Pressure Vessel Code.


2011 ◽  
Vol 462-463 ◽  
pp. 1325-1330
Author(s):  
Al Emran Ismail ◽  
Ahmad Kamal Ariffin ◽  
Shahrum Abdullah ◽  
Mariyam Jameelah Ghazali ◽  
M. Abdulrazzaq

The stress intensity factor (SIF) under the combined bending and torsion loading were studied using a finite element (FE) analysis ANSYS. A 20-node iso-parametric element was used to model the crack tip and the square-root singularity of stress/strain was employed by shifting the mid-side node to the ¼ position to the crack tip. Different crack geometries and loading ratios were used and due to the non-symmetrical analysis involved, a full FE model was developed and analyzed. Remotely applied bending and torsion moment were subjected to the FE model and the SIF were then calculated along the crack front under such loadings. The SIF calculated using the finite element analysis (FEA) was compared with those results obtained using an effective combined SIF method. According to the comparisons, the discrepancies were dependent on the normalized coordinate, x/h, the relative crack depth, a/D, the crack aspect ratio, a/b and the loading ratio, .


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document