Using the biologic license application or new drug application as a basis for the common technical document

2004 ◽  
pp. 251-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
MaryAnn Foote
2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 19-26
Author(s):  
Charmy Kothari ◽  
Kavina Shah

The United States Department of Health and Human Services has a federal agency called the Food and Drug Administration (FDA or USFDA). A pre-planned assembling of two or more people who have been together for the purpose of getting a common goal via verbal interaction is called a formal meeting. During development stage of any drug or biological products pharmaceutical companies face trouble for both scientific and regulatory point of view, here role of formal meetings comes. Formal meetings between sponsor or applicant and FDA are usually related to development and review of drug and biological products. Center for Drug evaluation and Research (CDER) and Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) regulates the formal meetings. These meetings are applicable to Pre – Investigational New Drug Application, Pre – Biologics License Application, New Drug Application for drugs and biological products and not applicable to Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDA), application of medical devices and submission of biosimilar biological products. Meetings between FDA and sponsor or applicant are for resolution of dispute, clinical holds discussion, Assessment of protocols of clinical trial, during clinical trials, in between clinical trials – at the phase 1 ending or at the phase 2 ending, to discuss development program. The FDA has classified these formal meetings in different types based on the nature of the request, the information in the meeting request and each meeting type is handled through different procedures. The principles of Good Meeting Management Practices (GMMPs) must be maintained. There are specific requirements and procedures to request, prepare, schedule, conduct and document formal meetings. As the guidance documents for meetings are revised by FDA, Change in procedure and requirements takes place. Any pharmaceutical company need to be in line with new guidance requirements to avoid rejection. Formal meetings between sponsor or applicant and FDA save time, cost and will increase the probability of product approval.


2001 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Smith ◽  
P. Trennery ◽  
D. Farningham ◽  
J. Klapwijk

Prior to controlled clinical trials in human volunteers or patients it is required that novel pharmaceuticals are evaluated for pre-clinical safety in a rodent and a non-rodent ('second') species. In most cases the rodent species used has been the rat and the second species has been the dog or macaque (usually cynomolgus or rhesus) monkey. However, there is an increasing trend within the United Kingdom (UK) pharmaceutical industry to use the common marmoset ( Callithrix jacchus) for pre-clinical toxicology programmes. This paper examines the practicality of using the common marmoset (henceforth referred to as 'the marmoset') in toxicological testing and reviews metabolic and pharmacodynamic similarities between this species and humans. It then discusses some of the advantages and disadvantages of the use of this species when compared with two other alternatives to the dog and macaque, namely the ferret and minipig. In particular, the marmoset has clear advantages over the macaque in terms of animal welfare and practicality. There is regulatory acceptance of this species for Investigational New Drug (IND), Clinical Trial Exemption (CTX), New Drug Application (NDA) and Marketing Authorization Application (MAA) registrations. Whilst the dog is likely to be maintained as the primary non-rodent species in toxicology, the marmoset has been, and will likely continue to be, adopted as an additional non-rodent species in pre-clinical toxicology programmes where appropriate.


2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 379-396
Author(s):  
Lorrene A. Buckley ◽  
Ilona Bebenek ◽  
Paul D. Cornwell ◽  
Aimee Hodowanec ◽  
Eric C. Jensen ◽  
...  

Drug development is a term used to define the entire process of bringing a new drug or device to market. It is an integrated, multidisciplinary endeavor that includes drug discovery, chemistry and pharmacology, nonclinical safety testing, manufacturing, clinical trials, and regulatory submissions. This report summarizes presentations of a workshop entitled “Drug Development 101,” held at the 39th Annual Meeting of the American College of Toxicology in West Palm Beach, Florida. The workshop was designed to provide an introductory overview of drug development. Experienced scientists from industry and government provided overviews of each area, with a focus on safety assessment, and described some of the challenges that can arise. The role of chemistry and manufacturing was discussed in the context of early- and late-stage product development and approaches to assess, control, and limit impurities. The toxicologic assessment was emphasized in early-phase development, from the selection of a candidate drug through the determination of a first-in-human starting dose. Clinical trial development was discussed in the context of regulatory requirements and expectations. The final topic of issues and considerations in the review processes of different types of submissions to Food and Drug Administration included advice for best practices in authoring good Investigational New Drug and New Drug Application/Biologic License Application submissions and interacting effectively with regulatory reviewers.


2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 334-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akihiro Hirakawa ◽  
Tadaaki Nishikawa ◽  
Kan Yonemori ◽  
Taro Shibata ◽  
Kenichi Nakamura ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document