Androgen-receptor modifications of prostate cancer cells upon long-term androgen ablation

2003 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
pp. 39
Author(s):  
R.B Marques ◽  
S Erkens-Schulze ◽  
C.M de Ridder ◽  
K Hermans ◽  
J Trapman ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Manqi Zhang ◽  
Yanhao Lai ◽  
Judy L. Vasquez ◽  
Dominic I. James ◽  
Kate M. Smith ◽  
...  

The Prostate ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 259-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karina Pfeil ◽  
Iris E. Eder ◽  
Thomas Putz ◽  
Reinhold Ramoner ◽  
Zoran Culig ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 459-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Howard I Scher ◽  
Grant Buchanan ◽  
William Gerald ◽  
Lisa M Butler ◽  
Wayne D Tilley

The categorization of prostate cancers that are progressing after castration as ‘hormone-refractory’ evolved from the clinical observation that surgical or medical castration (i.e. androgen ablation therapy; AAT) is not curative and, despite an initial response, virtually all tumors eventually regrow. Successful AAT is contingent on the dependence of prostate cancer cells for androgen signaling through an intracellular mediator, the androgen receptor (AR) for survival. Current preclinical and clinical data imply that the AR is expressed and continues to mediate androgen signaling after failure of AAT. As AAT does not completely eliminate circulating androgens, sufficient concentrations of dihydrotestosterone may accumulate in tumor cells to maintain AR signaling, especially in the context of upregulated receptor levels or increased sensitivity of the AR for activation. In addition, ligands of non-testicular origin or ligand-independent activation can contribute to continued AR signaling. In many cases, therefore, from the perspective of the AR, a ‘hormone-refractory’ classification after failure of AAT is inappropriate. Classifying prostate tumors that progress after AAT as ‘castration-resistant’ may be more relevant. Clinical responses to second- and third-line hormonal therapies suggest that the mechanisms of AR activation are in part a function of previously administered AAT. Accordingly, the increasing trend to utilize AAT earlier in the course of the clinical disease may have a greater influence on the genotype and phenotype of the resistant tumor. In this article, we detail strategies to inhibit the growth of prostate cancer cells that specifically target the AR in addition to those practiced traditionally that indirectly target the receptor by reducing the amount of circulating ligand. We propose that treatment regimes combining AAT with direct AR targeting strategies may provide a more complete blockade of androgen signaling, thereby preventing or significantly delaying the emergence of treatment-resistant disease.


2011 ◽  
Vol 300 (5) ◽  
pp. E902-E908 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fu-Ning Hsu ◽  
Min-Shiou Yang ◽  
Eugene Lin ◽  
Chun-Fu Tseng ◽  
Ho Lin

Androgen ablation therapy is the most common strategy for suppressing prostate cancer progression; however, tumor cells eventually escape androgen dependence and progress to an androgen-independent phase. The androgen receptor (AR) plays a pivotal role in this transition. To address this transition mystery in prostate cancer, we established an androgen-independent prostate cancer cell line (LNCaPdcc), by long-term screening of LNCaP cells in androgen-deprived conditions, to investigate changes of molecular mechanisms before and after androgen withdrawal. We found that LNCaPdcc cells displayed a neuroendocrine morphology, less aggressive growth, and lower expression levels of cell cycle-related factors, although the cell cycle distribution was similar to parental LNCaP cells. Notably, higher protein expression of AR, phospho-Ser81-AR, and PSA in LNCaPdcc cells were observed. The nuclear distribution and protein stability of AR increased in LNCaPdcc cells. In addition, cell proliferation results exhibited the biphasic nature of the androgen (R1881) effect in two cell lines. On the other hand, LNCaPdcc cells expressed higher levels of Her2, phospho-Tyr1221/1222-Her2, ErbB3, and ErbB4 proteins than parental LNCaP cells. These two cell lines exhibited distinct responses to Her2 activation (by heregulin treatment) on Her2 phosphorylation and Her2 inhibition (by AG825 or Herceptin treatments) on proliferation. In addition, the Her2 inhibitor more effectively caused AR degradation and diminished AR Ser81 phosphorylation in LNCaPdcc cells. Taken together, our data demonstrate that Her2 plays an important role in the support of AR protein stability in the transition of androgen requirement in prostate cancer cells. We hope these findings will provide novel insight into the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer.


2004 ◽  
Vol 171 (4S) ◽  
pp. 162-162
Author(s):  
Paul Thelen ◽  
Michal Grzmil ◽  
Iris E. Eder ◽  
Barbara Spengler ◽  
Peter Burfeind ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document