Does Routine Induction of Labour at 41 Weeks Really Reduce the Rate of Caesarean Section Compared With Expectant Management?

2009 ◽  
Vol 31 (7) ◽  
pp. 621-626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heidi Pavicic ◽  
Kathy Hamelin ◽  
Savas M. Menticoglou
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Expectant Management ◽  
Induction Of Labour

Prolonged pregnancy

2020 ◽  
pp. 389-394
Author(s):  
Kate F. Walker ◽  
Jim G. Thornton
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Pregnancy Loss ◽  
Expectant Management ◽  
Induction Of Labour ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Perinatal Morbidity ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Oxytocin Infusion ◽  
Prolonged Pregnancy ◽  
Overall Risk

Prolongation of gestation beyond 42+0 weeks (or 294 days) affects about 6% of pregnancies. It is associated with an increased risk of perinatal morbidity and mortality; the overall risk of pregnancy loss (stillbirth plus death occurring up to the age of 1 year) increases eightfold between 37 weeks and 43 weeks. Since trials comparing induction of labour with expectant management suggest that induction does not increase the rate of caesarean section, many clinicians offer it for pregnancies beyond 41 weeks. Induction of labour is usually performed using prostaglandin ripening followed, if necessary, by amniotomy and oxytocin infusion.

scholarly journals A comparative study of feto-maternal outcome in expectant management versus active management in pre-labor rupture of membranes at term

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 146
Author(s):  
Savitha T. S. ◽  
Pruthvi S. ◽  
Sudha C. P. ◽  
Vikram S. Nadig
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Maternal Morbidity ◽  
Caesarean Section Rate ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Expectant Management ◽  
Neonatal Morbidity ◽  
Neonatal Infection ◽  
Induction Of Labour ◽  
Active Management ◽  
Induction Group

Background: Premature rupture of the membranes at term is spontaneous rupture of the membranes after 37 weeks of gestation and before the onset of the regular painful uterine contractions, complicates 5-10% of pregnancies, 80% of cases of PROM occur at term. It complicates the pregnancy leading to maternal and fetal complications, immediate risks such as cord prolapse, cord compression and placental abruptions, and later risks such as maternal or neonatal infection and the interventions such as caesarean section and instrumental vaginal delivery. These cases are either managed conservatively or by immediate induction of labour. Objective of present study is to compare the efficacy and safety of induction of labor versus expectant management at term PROM, in terms of maternal and fetal outcome.Methods: A randomized control trial of 100 women coming to KIMSH from 01 /04 /2015 to 01 /05 /2016 with PROM at term with duration of leak ≤6 hours and a Bishop score ≤5 were assigned to group A immediate induction group and group B expectant management group with 50 cases in each group.Results: The mean interval from PROM to delivery was significantly shorter in the induction Group 15.62±4.97 as compared with expectant group 17.58±4.78. Incidence of maternal morbidity and neonatal morbidity was comparable in both the groups. Intrapartum complications and mode of delivery were similar in both groups.Conclusions: Immediate induction of labour in cases of PROM at term using oral misoprostol resulted in shorter induction delivery interval and hospital stay. Maternal morbidity and neonatal morbidity was comparable in both groups. It is concluded that immediate induction is better than expectant management. With active management many patients delivered vaginally within 24 hours without increase in the Caesarean section rate and decreased the need for oxytocin augmentation.

scholarly journals Maternal Outcomes of Expectant Management In comparison with Induction of Labour within twenty four hours of Premature Rupture of Membranes (PROM).

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (08) ◽  
pp. 1565-1569
Author(s):  
Saima Ashraf ◽  
Hajira Sultana ◽  
Saima Yasmin Qadir ◽  
Muhammad Khalid
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Expectant Management ◽  
Induction Of Labour ◽  
Maternal Outcomes ◽  
Premature Rupture Of Membranes ◽  
Premature Rupture ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Objective: this study is conducted to compare the maternal outcomes of expectant management versus induction of labour within 24 hours of premature rupture of membranes. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department, Nishtar Hospital, Multan. Period: From 15 March 2018 to 15 September 2018. Material & Methods: A total of 130 pregnant women with parity 0 – 4 having singleton pregnancy, ≥37 weeks pregnant and having premature rupture of membranes were taken in the study. Women having previous caesarean section, with history of hypertension or diabetes, features suggestive of chorioamnionitis, preterm pre-labour rupture of membranes and women with foetal distress were excluded from the study. Two groups were made. In Group (A) women were subjected to expectant management in which patients were observed for uterine contractions for a period of 24 hours. In Group (B) women were induced with tab dinoprostone 2 doses each 3 mg given 6 hours apart. Information regarding caesarean section, vaginal delivery and chorioamnionitis was recorded on a specially designed proforma. Results: In this study age range was from 18 to 35 years while in both groups most patients were 28 – 35 years old. In Group (A) mean gestational age was 38.246 ± 0.84 weeks while in Group (B) it was 37.953 ± 0.95 weeks. In Group (A) mean parity was 1.076 ± 1.16 and in Group (B) it was 1.815 ± 1.16. in Group (A) 2.092 ± 0.67 hours was mean duration of PROM while in Group (B) it was 2.092 ±0.67 hours. Mean BMI in Group (A) was 26.088 ±3.80 kg/m2 and in Group (B) it was 26.361 ±4.33 kg/m2. In Group (A), 24 patient (36.9%) delivered vaginally while 42 (64.6%) patient delivered vaginally in Group (B). 41 patients (63%) had cesarean section in Group (A) while in Group (B) 23 patients (35.4%) had cesarean section. Chorioamnionitis was seen in 14 patients (21.5%) in Group (A) while 3 patients (4.6%) had chorioamnionitis in Group (B). Conclusion: Our study concluded that induction of labour with twenty four hours of premature rupture of membranes does causes a reduction in occurrence of chorioamnionitis. By this approach patients are usually delivered within 24 hours and caesarean section rate is not increased. This approach also causes a reduction in augmentation of labour by oxytocin.

scholarly journals INDUCTION OF LABOUR;

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (04) ◽  
pp. 522-525
Author(s):  
Nadia Taj ◽  
Rahat Akhtar ◽  
Sumera Mehnaz ◽  
Aamir Furqan
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Gestational Age ◽  
Expectant Management ◽  
Induction Of Labour ◽  
P Value ◽  
Pregnancy Induced Hypertension ◽  
Induction Group ◽  
Induced Hypertension ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Objectives: To compare maternal outcome in planned induction of laborversus expectant management in pregnancy induced hypertension between 36 to 40 weeks ofgestation. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Obstetrics and Gynecology UnitII of Nishter Hospital Multan. Period: January 2016 to July 2016. Materials and Methods: Onehundred and thirty six (136) women with diagnosis of mild pregnancy induced hypertension,having gestational age 36 to 40 weeks were selected for this study. The selected patients wereallocated randomly into two equal groups i.e. Group A (Induction group) & Group B (Expectantgroup). The primary outcomes of this study were rate of cesarean section delivery anddevelopment of severe pre-eclampsia. Independent sample t-test was used to compare agebetween the groups. Chi-square test was used to compare age groups and study endpointsbetween the groups. Results: Mean gestational age at the time of delivery was 38.3 ± 0.75weeks for group A and 39.2 ± 0.55 weeks for group B (P-value >0.05). Mode of delivery was 52(76.47%) patients by vaginal and 16 (23.53%) by caesarean section in group A. While in groupB, out of 68 deliveries, 40 (58.82%) patients delivered by vaginal and 28 (41.18%) by caesareansection (p-value <0.05). Regarding maternal outcomes, severe pre-eclampsia occurred in 05(7.35%) women of group A while in group B, it was noted 15 (22.05%) women (p-value<0.05).The final outcome was considered satisfactory in 76.47% patients in Induction group regardingvaginal delivery and severe pre-eclampsia while in Expectant group satisfactory outcomes wereachieved in only 23.53% women (p-value <0.05). Conclusion: Induction of labour is associatedwith improved maternal outcome in terms of caesarean section and pre-eclampsia in womenwith mild PIH beyond 36 weeks of gestation as compared to the expectant management.

scholarly journals Induction of labor versus expectant management of patients with gestational hypertension at term.

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (01) ◽  
pp. 57-61
Author(s):  
Fozia Mohammad Bakhsh ◽  
Khanda Gul ◽  
Safia Bibi ◽  
Palwasha Gul
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Diastolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Gestational Hypertension ◽  
Expectant Management ◽  
Severe Preeclampsia ◽  
Induction Of Labour ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Objective: To compare maternal morbidity in planned induction of labour versus expectant management in women with gestational hypertension at term. Study Design: Randomized Clinical Trial. Setting: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bolan Medical Complex Hospital Quetta. Period: January 2017 to December 2017. Material & Methods: 240 pregnant women with the diagnosis of gestational hypertension with systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg without proteinuria were included. Patients were equally divided into two groups; group A (the intervention group) and group B (the expectant group). In group A, cervical ripening was stimulated with use of intravaginal prostaglandins. In group B, patients were monitored until the onset of spontaneous Labour. In both groups intervention was recommended in case of non-optimal FHR, the diastolic blood pressure ≥110mmHg or the systolic blood pressure ≥170 mmHg and eclampsia. Results: Out of 120 deliveries, 87 (72.5%) delivered by vaginal and 33 (27.5%) by caesarean section in group A. While in group B, out of 120 deliveries, 66 (55%) delivered by vaginal and 54 (45%) by caesarean section. The frequency of maternal outcome like mild preeclampsia present in 15% and 40% of women in group A and in group B respectively. Severe preeclampsia was noted 7.5% and 22.5% in group A and in group B respectively. Seizures were found in 2.5% of women in group A and 10% of women in group B. Conclusion: Complications like mild and severe preeclampsia and eclampsia could be prevented by induction of labour at term and also by widespread use of prenatal care education, prompt diagnosis and treatment of gestational hypertension.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document