Efficacy and safety of the novel glycine transporter inhibitor BI 425809 once daily in patients with schizophrenia: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 study

Abstract Background Third-generation cephalosporin (3GC)-resistant Enterobacteriaceae has been classified as critical priority pathogens. The novel extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) inhibitor enmetazobactam (formerly AAI101; EMT) in combination with cefepime (FEP) is currently being developed as a carbapenem-sparing treatment of serious Gram-negative infections in settings with a high prevalence of 3GC-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. We report here the results from a phase 2 study that assessed safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of FEP-EMT in patients with cUTI/AP. Methods Forty-five patients were enrolled in a randomized, multicenter, double-blind study of hospitalized adults with cUTI/AP. Patients received dosing regimens of FEP or FEP-EMT IV therapy q8h by 2 hours infusion (table) for 7 to 10 days with a 28-day follow-up. Efficacy was evaluated in the microbiological-modified ITT (µMITT) population. Safety was monitored in patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Clinical cure was designated as the resolution of cUTI symptoms present at study entry. Plasma and urine PK were determined from all patients. Results The study drugs were well tolerated in each cohort, with similar % adverse events and no new or unexpected safety concerns (table). Two discontinuations were due to allergic dermatitis. The microbiological- and clinical responses at test-of-cure for the combined FEP-EMT group were 83.3% (20/24) and 95.8% (23/24) compared with responses in the combined FEP group of 73.3% (11/15) and 93.3% (14/15), respectively (table). The most common baseline pathogens were Escherichia coli (66.7%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (23.1%): 28.2% of isolates produced ESBLs with eradication rates for the combined FEP-EMT group of 85.7% (6/7) and for the combined FEP group of 75.0% (3/4). FEP and EMT PK were best described by a 2-compartment, linear PK model. Both agents exhibited half-lives of 2.3 hours. Creatinine clearance had a significant covariate effect on FEP and EMT, consistent with predominant renal excretion of both agents. Conclusion Results from this phase 2 study justify advancement to phase 3 studies to evaluate the safety and efficacy of FEP-EMT in patients with cUTI/AP. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Download Full-text

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 2 Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Plazomicin Compared with Levofloxacin in the Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infection and Acute Pyelonephritis

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy ◽

10.1128/aac.01989-17 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 62 (4) ◽

Cited By ~ 31

Author(s):

Lynn E. Connolly ◽

Valerie Riddle ◽

Deborah Cebrik ◽

Eliana S. Armstrong ◽

Loren G. Miller

Keyword(s):

Urinary Tract Infection ◽

Urinary Tract ◽

Tract Infection ◽

Acute Pyelonephritis ◽

Complicated Urinary Tract Infection ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Double Blind ◽

Content Type ◽

Phase 2 Study

ABSTRACTIncreasing antimicrobial resistance among uropathogens limits treatment options for patients with complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI). Plazomicin, a new aminoglycoside, hasin vitroactivity against multidrug-resistantEnterobacteriaceae, including isolates resistant to currently available aminoglycosides, as well as extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing and carbapenem-resistantEnterobacteriaceae. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of plazomicin in a double-blind, comparator-controlled, phase 2 study in adults with cUTI or acute pyelonephritis. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive intravenous plazomicin (10 or 15 mg/kg of body weight) or intravenous levofloxacin (750 mg) once daily for 5 days. Coprimary efficacy endpoints were microbiological eradication at the test of cure (TOC; 5 to 12 days after the last dose) in the modified intent-to-treat (MITT) and microbiologically evaluable (ME) populations. Overall, 145 patients were randomized to treatment. In the groups receiving plazomicin at 10 mg/kg, plazomicin at 15 mg/kg, and levofloxacin, microbiological eradication rates were, respectively, 50.0% (6 patients with microbiological eradication at TOC/12 patients treated [95% confidence interval {CI}, 21.1 to 78.9%]), 60.8% (31/51 [95% CI, 46.1 to 74.2%]), and 58.6% (17/29 [95% CI, 38.9 to 76.5%]) in the MITT population and 85.7% (6/7 [95% CI, 42.1 to 99.6%]), 88.6% (31/35 [95% CI, 73.3 to 96.8%]), and 81.0% (17/21 [95% CI, 58.1 to 94.6%]) in the ME population. In the MITT population, 66.7% (95% CI, 34.9 to 90.1%), 70.6% (95% CI, 56.2 to 82.5%), and 65.5% (95% CI, 45.7 to 82.1%) of the patients in the three groups, respectively, were assessed by the investigator to be clinically cured at TOC. Adverse events were reported in 31.8%, 35.1%, and 47.7% of the patients in the three groups, respectively. Serum creatinine values were generally stable over the course of the study. No plazomicin-treated patients with evaluable audiometry data had postbaseline sensorineural, conductive, or mixed hearing loss. In summary, plazomicin demonstrated microbiological and clinical success and an overall safety profile supportive of further clinical development. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT01096849.)

Download Full-text