Dental microwear analysis: historical perspectives and new approaches

Author(s):  
Peter S. Ungar ◽  
Peter S. Scott ◽  
Jessica R. Scott ◽  
Mark Teaford
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 4789-4800 ◽  
Author(s):  
April K. Smith ◽  
Laurie J. Reitsema ◽  
Frank L’Engle Williams ◽  
Rosa Boano ◽  
Giuseppe Vercellotti

Author(s):  
Sireen El Zataari ◽  
Peter Ungar

More than fifty years ago researchers recognised that microscopic patterns of wear on tooth enamel surfaces record information about ingestive behaviours and diets. Various methods of analysis have since been developed and applied to detect subtle dietary differences amongst extant and extinct species, and to differentiate short-term and seasonal variations in diet. This chapter provides a historical overview of methods of dental microwear analysis and their applications to non-human primates and fossil hominins. We consider in detail microwear texture analysis, wherein scanning confocal profilometry and scale-sensitive fractal analysis are used as tools for 3D characterization of microwear features. Studies employing this technique on a broad range of taxa, including hominins, attest to its efficacy, and provide insights into diets of extinct forms. We also for the first time compare microwear textures of Plio-Pleistocene species with those of Neanderthals to consider variation in diet between earlier and more recent fossil hominins.


Author(s):  
Tom Wilkie ◽  
Ingrid Mainland

Insight into the diet of domestic animals in the archaeological record can elucidate diverse activities pertaining to ancient agricultural systems, including the utilization of the landscape by livestock and their herders (Bocherens et al. 2001; Bentley et al. 2003; Charles & Bogaard 2005), the impact of livestock farming on the environment (Amorosi et al. 1998; Witt et al. 2000; Mainland 2001), seasonality in husbandry practices (Akeret et al. 1999; Akeret & Rentzel 2001; Charles & Bogaard 2005), animal productivity (Amorosi et al. 1998) and the role of animals in society (Moens & Wetterstom 1988; Mainland & Halstead 2004). Research into the diet of domestic livestock has, however, largely focused on cattle, sheep, and goats (see for example all the references cited above) and it is only relatively recently that palaeodietary studies have begun to consider suid diet/nutrition and its potential value for elucidating the socio-economics of pig husbandry (e.g. Ervynck et al. this volume). This article presents one further such study: an analysis of dental microwear patterning in domestic pigs from selected Late Iron Age to medieval contexts in England, undertaken as part of a wider project into the potential application of dental microwear analysis to the question of pig diet and management in the prehistoric and historic past (Mainland et al. in prep.). Dental microwear analysis, although still primarily used within palaeontology (Teaford 1994; Rose & Ungar 1998), is increasingly being applied in archaeology to reconstruct both human (Rose & Ungar 1998; Schmidt 2001) and animal diet (Beuls et al. 2000; Mainland & Halstead 2004). In common with many other palaeodietary techniques (e.g. Schwarcz & Schoeninger 1991), dental microwear will not identify the consumption of individual foodstuffs but rather reflects broad functional and/or dietary adaptations (Rose & Ungar 1998); for example, browsing vs grazing (Solounias & Hayek 1993), folivory vs frugivory (Teaford & Walker 1984), hard vs soft diet (Teaford & Oyen 1989). Preliminary studies in modern suid populations have indicated that one basic axis of variation in pig diet/management is potentially identifiable using dental microwear, namely the separation of indoor-reared/stall-fed and outdoor reared/rooting populations (Ward & Mainland 1999).


2019 ◽  
Vol 67 ◽  
pp. 449-467
Author(s):  
Leslea J. Hlusko ◽  
Peter S. Ungar

Colleagues often refer to Alan Walker as the Eric Clapton (one of the most influential musicians of the late twentieth century) of palaeoanthropology in recognition of the artistry of his science. His field discoveries filled major gaps in our knowledge of primate evolution, such as elucidating the Miocene world of Proconsul and finding the transitional ‘Black Skull’ of Australopithecus aethiopicus and the skeleton of a Homo erectus boy. In addition to discovering these remarkable fossils, Alan was essential in bringing a palaeobiological approach to the laboratory interpretation of their bony morphology. He used the relationships between form and function in living species as a baseline for understanding the past, he pioneered dental microwear analysis to infer diet and was an early-adopter of the use of microCT to explore the internal structure of primate ear bones. Beyond these scientific accomplishments, however, it was Alan's grace and generosity that truly set him apart from his peers. As the patriarch of an extensive intellectual family of students, postdocs and colleagues, Alan taught by example how to be intellectually creative, brave, meticulous, generous and kind. His legacy will long be felt in both the science and the culture of palaeoanthropology.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document