Multiple stressor debriefing as a model for intervention

2000 ◽  
pp. 290-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith Armstrong
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 402-410
Author(s):  
Michelle C. Jackson ◽  
Samraat Pawar ◽  
Guy Woodward

Inland Waters ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Bryan M. Spears ◽  
Daniel Chapman ◽  
Laurence Carvalho ◽  
Katri Rankinen ◽  
Konstantinos Stefanidis ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Sergi Sabater ◽  
Arturo Elosegi ◽  
Ralf Ludwig
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Richard Connon ◽  
Simone Hasenbein ◽  
Susanne Brander ◽  
Helen Poynton ◽  
Erika Holland ◽  
...  

Legacy and current-use contaminants enter into and accumulate throughout the San Francisco Bay−Delta (Bay−Delta), and are present at concentrations with known effects on species important to this diverse watershed. There remains major uncertainty and a lack of focused research able to address and provide understanding of effects across multiple biological scales, despite previous and ongoing emphasis on the need for it. These needs are challenging specifically because of the established regulatory programs that often monitor on a chemical-by-chemical basis, or in which decisions are grounded in lethality-based endpoints. To best address issues of contaminants in the Bay−Delta, monitoring efforts should consider effects of environmentally relevant mixtures and sub-lethal impacts that can affect ecosystem health. These efforts need to consider the complex environment in the Bay−Delta including variable abiotic (e.g., temperature, salinity) and biotic (e.g., pathogens) factors. This calls for controlled and focused research, and the development of a multi-disciplinary contaminant monitoring and assessment program that provides information across biological scales. Information gained in this manner will contribute toward evaluating parameters that could alleviate ecologically detrimental outcomes. This review is a result of a Special Symposium convened at the University of California−Davis (UCD) on January 31, 2017 to address critical information needed on how contaminants affect the Bay−Delta. The UCD Symposium focused on new tools and approaches for assessing multiple stressor effects to freshwater and estuarine systems. Our approach is similar to the recently proposed framework laid out by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) that uses weight of evidence to scale toxicological responses to chemical contaminants in a laboratory, and to guide the conservation of priority species and habitats. As such, we also aimed to recommend multiple endpoints that could be used to promote a multi-disciplinary understanding of contaminant risks in Bay−Delta while supporting management needs.


Author(s):  
W. S. Kwan ◽  
D. Nikezic ◽  
Vellaisamy A. L. Roy ◽  
K. N. Yu

The present paper reviews available background information for studying multiple stressor effects of radon (222Rn) and phthalates in children and provides insights on future directions. In realistic situations, living organisms are collectively subjected to many environmental stressors, with the resultant effects being referred to as multiple stressor effects. Radon is a naturally occurring radioactive gas that can lead to lung cancers. On the other hand, phthalates are semi-volatile organic compounds widely applied as plasticizers to provide flexibility to plastic in consumer products. Links of phthalates to various health effects have been reported, including allergy and asthma. In the present review, the focus on indoor contaminants was due to their higher concentrations and to the higher indoor occupancy factor, while the focus on the pediatric population was due to their inherent sensitivity and their spending more time close to the floor. Two main future directions in studying multiple stressor effects of radon and phthalates in children were proposed. The first one was on computational modeling and micro-dosimetric studies, and the second one was on biological studies. In particular, dose-response relationship and effect-specific models for combined exposures to radon and phthalates would be necessary. The ideas and methodology behind such proposed research work are also applicable to studies on multiple stressor effects of collective exposures to other significant airborne contaminants, and to population groups other than children.


2005 ◽  
Vol 64 (6) ◽  
pp. 541-556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terrence Deak ◽  
Kelly A. Bordner ◽  
Nevin K. McElderry ◽  
Christopher J. Barnum ◽  
Peter Blandino ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 95 (7) ◽  
pp. 1015-1024 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Salbu ◽  
H. C. Teien ◽  
O. C. Lind ◽  
K. E. Tollefsen
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 754 ◽  
pp. 141941 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel J. Macaulay ◽  
Kimberly J. Hageman ◽  
Jeremy J. Piggott ◽  
Christoph D. Matthaei

2020 ◽  
Vol 287 (1926) ◽  
pp. 20200421 ◽  
Author(s):  
James A. Orr ◽  
Rolf D. Vinebrooke ◽  
Michelle C. Jackson ◽  
Kristy J. Kroeker ◽  
Rebecca L. Kordas ◽  
...  

Anthropogenic environmental changes, or ‘stressors’, increasingly threaten biodiversity and ecosystem functioning worldwide. Multiple-stressor research is a rapidly expanding field of science that seeks to understand and ultimately predict the interactions between stressors. Reviews and meta-analyses of the primary scientific literature have largely been specific to either freshwater, marine or terrestrial ecology, or ecotoxicology. In this cross-disciplinary study, we review the state of knowledge within and among these disciplines to highlight commonality and division in multiple-stressor research. Our review goes beyond a description of previous research by using quantitative bibliometric analysis to identify the division between disciplines and link previously disconnected research communities. Towards a unified research framework, we discuss the shared goal of increased realism through both ecological and temporal complexity, with the overarching aim of improving predictive power. In a rapidly changing world, advancing our understanding of the cumulative ecological impacts of multiple stressors is critical for biodiversity conservation and ecosystem management. Identifying and overcoming the barriers to interdisciplinary knowledge exchange is necessary in rising to this challenge. Division between ecosystem types and disciplines is largely a human creation. Species and stressors cross these borders and so should the scientists who study them.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document