Introduction to the Theory of Fair Allocation

Author(s):  
William Thomson ◽  
Herve Moulin
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 21-23
Author(s):  
Xiao Sun ◽  
Tan N. Le ◽  
Mosharaf Chowdhury ◽  
Zhenhua Liu
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. medethics-2020-106969
Author(s):  
Joana Teles Sarmento ◽  
Cristina Lírio Pedrosa ◽  
Ana Sofia Carvalho

A public health emergency, as the COVID-19 pandemic, may lead to shortages of potentially life-saving treatments. In this situation, it is necessary, justifiable and proportionate to have decision tools in place to enable healthcare professionals to triage and prioritise access to those resources. An ethically sound framework should consider the principles of beneficence and fair allocation. Scientific Societies across Europe were concerned with this problem early in the pandemic and published guidelines to support their professionals and institutions. This article aims to compare triage policies from medical bodies across Europe, to characterise the process of triage and the ethical values, principles and theories that were proposed in different countries during the first outbreak of COVID-19.


2019 ◽  
Vol 124 ◽  
pp. 325-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunpeng Li ◽  
Changjie He ◽  
Yichuan Jiang ◽  
Weiwei Wu ◽  
Jiuchuan Jiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

1990 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-41
Author(s):  
C. Chang ◽  
W. -P. Liao ◽  
G. -R. Tsay
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-95
Author(s):  
Feiyue Li

Abstract The idea of ‘fairness’ may be viewed as fundamental to a nation’s participation in the development of the international legal system governing climate change. As the second-largest economy and the largest Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emitter in the world, China’s actions on climate change are critical to the global response. Indeed, international cooperation on climate change is unlikely to succeed without China’s active engagement. Therefore, China’s perception of the fairness of responsibility allocation will significantly influence its attitudes toward its international climate responsibilities. However, limited work has been done to date to concretely examine China’s perspective of the fairness of responsibility allocation and to understand its fairness discourses and practices of climate responsibility in a dynamically evolved process. This article aims to fill that gap in the literature by elucidating how China perceives the fair allocation of climate responsibility and how its fairness discourses and practices have evolved over the course of the three phases of international climate change negotiations. It will be shown that China has perceived the factors of historically accumulated emissions, per capita emissions and capability to lie at the very core of its understanding of fairness.


2021 ◽  
pp. 103633
Author(s):  
Mohammad Ghodsi ◽  
MohammadTaghi HajiAghayi ◽  
Masoud Seddighin ◽  
Saeed Seddighin ◽  
Hadi Yami

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document