scholarly journals P.057 A systematic review of the prophylactic antibiotic use in endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary lesions

2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (s2) ◽  
pp. S30-S31
Author(s):  
ID Moldovan ◽  
C Agbi ◽  
S Kilty ◽  
F Alkherayf
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Transsphenoidal Surgery ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Prophylactic Antibiotic ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Series Data ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Endoscopic Endonasal ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Surgery

Background: The benefit of prophylactic antibiotic use in endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery (EETS) for pituitary lesions is controversial. Many surgeons administer antibiotics perioperatively not based on clear guidelines but “to be safe”. Methods: A systematic review using PRISMA guidelines was performed to assess the efficacy of perioperative antibiotic use to prevent infectious complications in patients undergoing EETS. Inclusion criteria: randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, observational studies, and case series. Data extracted: study design, year of publication, sample size, surgery type, perioperative antibacterial treatment (antibiotic, dose, and duration), number of patients with 30-days post-operative meningitis and/or sinusitis. End points: rates of meningitis and sinusitis post-EETS. Results: A total of 280 articles were identified. Four observational studies met inclusion criteria. Based on GRADE score these studies were considered low in quality. 633 patients were -included in those studies. The most common antibiotics used were cefazolin and ceftazidime. The rate of infection ranged from 0.5% to 3.1 % for meningitis as the most common infection. Conclusions: The need to use antibiotic(s) perioperatively is not clear in patients with pituitary lesions undergoing EETS. Randomized control trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic antibiotic use in patients with pituitary lesions undergoing EETS.

scholarly journals Application of 3D printed model for planning the endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xing Huang ◽  
Ni Fan ◽  
Hai-jun Wang ◽  
Yan Zhou ◽  
Xudong Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
3D Printing ◽  
Skull Base ◽  
Transsphenoidal Surgery ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Spatial Relationship ◽  
Cranial Computed Tomography ◽  
Imaging Data ◽  
Endoscopic Endonasal ◽  
Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Surgery

AbstractThe application of 3D printing in planning endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery is illustrated based on the analysis of patients with intracranial skull base diseases who received treatment in our department. Cranial computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging data are attained preoperatively, and three-dimensional reconstruction is performed using MIMICS (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium). Models of intracranial skull base diseases are printed using a 3D printer before surgery. The models clearly demonstrate the morphologies of the intracranial skull base diseases and the spatial relationship with adjacent large vessels and bones. The printing time of each model is 12.52–15.32 h, and the cost ranges from 900 to 1500 RMB. The operative approach was planned in vitro, and patients recovered postoperatively well without severe complications or death. In a questionnaire about the application of 3D printing, experienced neurosurgeons achieved scores of 7.8–8.8 out of 10, while unexperienced neurosurgeons achieved scores of 9.2–9.8. Resection of intracranial skull base lesions is demonstrated to be well assisted by 3D printing technique, which has great potential in disclosing adjacent anatomical relationships and providing the required help to clinical doctors in preoperative planning.

Should Levetiracetam or Phenytoin Be Used for Posttraumatic Seizure Prophylaxis? A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-analysis

Neurosurgery ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 79 (6) ◽  
pp. 775-782 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nickalus R. Khan ◽  
Matthew A. VanLandingham ◽  
Tamara M. Fierst ◽  
Caroline Hymel ◽  
Kathryn Hoes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Antiepileptic Drug ◽  
Random Effects ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Seizure Prophylaxis ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Severe Tbi ◽  
Antiepileptic Drug Therapy

Abstract BACKGROUND: Posttraumatic seizure (PTS) is a significant complication of traumatic brain injury (TBI). OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare levetiracetam with phenytoin for seizure prophylaxis in patients diagnosed with severe TBI. METHODS: An inclusive search of several electronic databases and bibliographies was conducted to identify scientific studies that compared the effect of levetiracetam and phenytoin on PTS. Independent reviewers obtained data and classified the quality of each article that met inclusion criteria. A random effects meta-analysis was then completed. RESULTS: During June and July 2015, a systematic literature search was performed that identified 6097 articles. Of these, 7 met inclusion criteria. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed. A total of 1186 patients were included. The rate of seizure was 35 of 654 (5.4%) in the levetiracetam cohort and 18 of 532 (3.4%) in the phenytoin cohort. Our meta-analysis revealed no change in the rate of early PTS with levetiracetam compared with phenytoin (relative risk, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-1.95; P = .96). CONCLUSION: The lack of evidence on which antiepileptic drug to use in PTS is surprising given the number of patients prescribed an antiepileptic drug therapy for TBI. On the basis of currently available Level III evidence, patients treated with either levetiracetam or phenytoin have similar incidences of early seizures after TBI.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document