UNIVERSAL COMPUTABLY ENUMERABLE EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS

2014 ◽  
Vol 79 (01) ◽  
pp. 60-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
URI ANDREWS ◽  
STEFFEN LEMPP ◽  
JOSEPH S. MILLER ◽  
KENG MENG NG ◽  
LUCA SAN MAURO ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computable Function ◽  
Order Theory ◽  
Equivalence Relations ◽  
Index Set ◽  
First Order ◽  
First Order Theory ◽  
Bounded Poset ◽  
Image Position ◽  
Open Question ◽  
Computably Enumerable

Abstract We study computably enumerable equivalence relations (ceers), under the reducibility $R \le S$ if there exists a computable function f such that $x\,R\,y$ if and only if $f\left( x \right)\,\,S\,f\left( y \right)$ , for every $x,y$ . We show that the degrees of ceers under the equivalence relation generated by $\le$ form a bounded poset that is neither a lower semilattice, nor an upper semilattice, and its first-order theory is undecidable. We then study the universal ceers. We show that 1) the uniformly effectively inseparable ceers are universal, but there are effectively inseparable ceers that are not universal; 2) a ceer R is universal if and only if $R\prime \le R$ , where $R\prime$ denotes the halting jump operator introduced by Gao and Gerdes (answering an open question of Gao and Gerdes); and 3) both the index set of the universal ceers and the index set of the uniformly effectively inseparable ceers are ${\rm{\Sigma }}_3^0$ -complete (the former answering an open question of Gao and Gerdes).

scholarly journals THE VARIETY OF COSET RELATION ALGEBRAS

2018 ◽  
Vol 83 (04) ◽  
pp. 1595-1609 ◽  
Author(s):  
STEVEN GIVANT ◽  
HAJNAL ANDRÉKA
Keyword(s):  
Large Class ◽  
Identity Element ◽  
Relation Algebra ◽  
Order Theory ◽  
Relation Algebras ◽  
First Order ◽  
First Order Theory ◽  
Atomic Pair ◽  
Finite Set ◽  
Image Position

AbstractGivant [6] generalized the notion of an atomic pair-dense relation algebra from Maddux [13] by defining the notion of a measurable relation algebra, that is to say, a relation algebra in which the identity element is a sum of atoms that can be measured in the sense that the “size” of each such atom can be defined in an intuitive and reasonable way (within the framework of the first-order theory of relation algebras). In Andréka--Givant [2], a large class of examples of such algebras is constructed from systems of groups, coordinated systems of isomorphisms between quotients of the groups, and systems of cosets that are used to “shift” the operation of relative multiplication. In Givant--Andréka [8], it is shown that the class of these full coset relation algebras is adequate to the task of describing all measurable relation algebras in the sense that every atomic and complete measurable relation algebra is isomorphic to a full coset relation algebra.Call an algebra $\mathfrak{A}$ a coset relation algebra if $\mathfrak{A}$ is embeddable into some full coset relation algebra. In the present article, it is shown that the class of coset relation algebras is equationally axiomatizable (that is to say, it is a variety), but that no finite set of sentences suffices to axiomatize the class (that is to say, the class is not finitely axiomatizable).

A lattice of interpretability types of theories

1977 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 297-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Mycielski
Keyword(s):  
Order Theory ◽  
Partial Ordering ◽  
First Order ◽  
First Order Theory ◽  
Relative Consistency ◽  
Infinite Distributivity ◽  
Closed Fields ◽  
Image Position ◽  
Interpretability Type ◽  
Consistency Proofs

We consider first-order logic only. A theory S will be called locally interpretable in a theory T if every theorem of S is interpretable in T. If S is locally interpretable in T and T is consistent then S is consistent. Most known relative consistency proofs can be viewed as local interpretations. The classic examples are the cartesian interpretation of the elementary theorems of Euclidean n-dimensional geometry into the first-order theory of real closed fields, the interpretation of the arithmetic of integers (rational numbers) into the arithmetic of positive integers, the interpretation of ZF + (V = L) into ZF, the interpretation of analysis into ZFC, relative consistency proofs by forcing, etc. Those interpretations are global. Under fairly general conditions local interpretability implies global interpretability; see Remarks (7), (8), and (9) below.We define the type (interpretability type) of a theory S to be the class of all theories T such that S is locally interpretable in T and vice versa. There happen to be such types and they are partially ordered by the relation of local interpretability. This partial ordering is of lattice type and has the following form:The lattice is distributive and complete and satisfies the infinite distributivity law of Brouwerian lattices:We do not know if the dual lawis true. We will show that the lattice is algebraic and that its compact elements form a sublattice and are precisely the types of finitely axiomatizable theories, and several other facts.

INTERPRETING ARITHMETIC IN THE FIRST-ORDER THEORY OF ADDITION AND COPRIMALITY OF POLYNOMIAL RINGS

2019 ◽  
Vol 84 (3) ◽  
pp. 1194-1214
Author(s):  
JAVIER UTRERAS
Keyword(s):  
Power Series ◽  
Entire Functions ◽  
Order Theory ◽  
Ring Structure ◽  
Polynomial Rings ◽  
Series Ring ◽  
First Order ◽  
First Order Theory ◽  
Power Series Rings ◽  
Image Position

AbstractWe study the first-order theory of polynomial rings over a GCD domain and of the ring of formal entire functions over a non-Archimedean field in the language $\{ 1, + , \bot \}$. We show that these structures interpret the first-order theory of the semi-ring of natural numbers. Moreover, this interpretation depends only on the characteristic of the original ring, and thus we obtain uniform undecidability results for these polynomial and entire functions rings of a fixed characteristic. This work enhances results of Raphael Robinson on essential undecidability of some polynomial or formal power series rings in languages that contain no symbols related to the polynomial or power series ring structure itself.

CONSTRUCTING MANY ATOMIC MODELS IN ℵ1

2016 ◽  
Vol 81 (3) ◽  
pp. 1142-1162 ◽  
Author(s):  
JOHN T. BALDWIN ◽  
MICHAEL C. LASKOWSKI ◽  
SAHARON SHELAH
Keyword(s):  
Order Theory ◽  
Atomic Model ◽  
First Order ◽  
Atomic Models ◽  
First Order Theory ◽  
Image Position

AbstractWe introduce the notion of pseudoalgebraicity to study atomic models of first order theories (equivalently models of a complete sentence of ${L_{{\omega _1},\omega }}$). Theorem: Let T be any complete first-order theory in a countable language with an atomic model. If the pseudominimal types are not dense, then there are 2ℵ0 pairwise nonisomorphic atomic models of T, each of size ℵ1.

GALOIS GROUPS OF FIRST ORDER THEORIES

2001 ◽  
Vol 01 (02) ◽  
pp. 305-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. CASANOVAS ◽  
D. LASCAR ◽  
A. PILLAY ◽  
M. ZIEGLER
Keyword(s):  
Order Theory ◽  
Galois Groups ◽  
Equivalence Relations ◽  
First Order ◽  
First Order Theory

We study the groups Gal L(T) and Gal KP(T), and the associated equivalence relations EL and EKP, attached to a first order theory T. An example is given where EL≠ EKP (a non G-compact theory). It is proved that EKP is the composition of EL and the closure of EL. Other examples are given showing this is best possible.

scholarly journals NIP FOR THE ASYMPTOTIC COUPLE OF THE FIELD OF LOGARITHMIC TRANSSERIES

2017 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
ALLEN GEHRET
Keyword(s):  
Order Theory ◽  
Exchange Property ◽  
Independence Property ◽  
First Order ◽  
Valued Field ◽  
First Order Theory ◽  
Order Language ◽  
Complete Survey ◽  
Image Position

AbstractThe derivation on the differential-valued field Tlog of logarithmic transseries induces on its value group ${{\rm{\Gamma }}_{{\rm{log}}}}$ a certain map ψ. The structure ${\rm{\Gamma }} = \left( {{{\rm{\Gamma }}_{{\rm{log}}}},\psi } \right)$ is a divisible asymptotic couple. In [7] we began a study of the first-order theory of $\left( {{{\rm{\Gamma }}_{{\rm{log}}}},\psi } \right)$ where, among other things, we proved that the theory $T_{{\rm{log}}} = Th\left( {{\rm{\Gamma }}_{{\rm{log}}} ,\psi } \right)$ has a universal axiomatization, is model complete and admits elimination of quantifiers (QE) in a natural first-order language. In that paper we posed the question whether Tlog has NIP (i.e., the Non-Independence Property). In this paper, we answer that question in the affirmative: Tlog does have NIP. Our method of proof relies on a complete survey of the 1-types of Tlog, which, in the presence of QE, is equivalent to a characterization of all simple extensions ${\rm{\Gamma }}\left\langle \alpha \right\rangle$ of ${\rm{\Gamma }}$. We also show that Tlog does not have the Steinitz exchange property and we weigh in on the relationship between models of Tlog and the so-called precontraction groups of [9].

THE COMPLEXITY OF INDEX SETS OF CLASSES OF COMPUTABLY ENUMERABLE EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS

2016 ◽  
Vol 81 (4) ◽  
pp. 1375-1395 ◽  
Author(s):  
URI ANDREWS ◽  
ANDREA SORBI
Keyword(s):  
Open Problem ◽  
Equivalence Classes ◽  
Equivalence Relations ◽  
Index Set ◽  
Index Sets ◽  
Image Position ◽  
Computably Enumerable

AbstractLet$ \le _c $be computable the reducibility on computably enumerable equivalence relations (or ceers). We show that for every ceerRwith infinitely many equivalence classes, the index sets$\left\{ {i:R_i \le _c R} \right\}$(withRnonuniversal),$\left\{ {i:R_i \ge _c R} \right\}$, and$\left\{ {i:R_i \equiv _c R} \right\}$are${\rm{\Sigma }}_3^0$complete, whereas in caseRhas only finitely many equivalence classes, we have that$\left\{ {i:R_i \le _c R} \right\}$is${\rm{\Pi }}_2^0$complete, and$\left\{ {i:R \ge _c R} \right\}$(withRhaving at least two distinct equivalence classes) is${\rm{\Sigma }}_2^0$complete. Next, solving an open problem from [1], we prove that the index set of the effectively inseparable ceers is${\rm{\Pi }}_4^0$complete. Finally, we prove that the 1-reducibility preordering on c.e. sets is a${\rm{\Sigma }}_3^0$complete preordering relation, a fact that is used to show that the preordering relation$ \le _c $on ceers is a${\rm{\Sigma }}_3^0$complete preordering relation.

Prime models and almost decidability

1986 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 412-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terrence Millar
Keyword(s):  
Order Theory ◽  
The Other ◽  
Prime Model ◽  
First Order ◽  
Decidable Theory ◽  
Complete Extension ◽  
First Order Theory ◽  
Additional Constant ◽  
Open Question ◽  
Countable Models

This paper introduces and investigates a notion that approximates decidability with respect to countable structures. The paper demonstrates that there exists a decidable first order theory with a prime model that is not almost decidable. On the other hand it is proved that if a decidable complete first order theory has only countably many complete types, then it has a prime model that is almost decidable. It is not true that every decidable complete theory with only countably many complete types has a decidable prime model. It is not known whether a complete decidable theory with only countably many countable models up to isomorphism must have a decidable prime model. In [1] a weaker result was proven—if every complete extension, in finitely many additional constant symbols, of a theory T fails to have a decidable prime model, then T has 2ω nonisomorphic countable models. The corresponding statement for saturated models is false, even if all the complete types are recursive, as was shown in [2]. This paper investigates a variation of the open question via a different notion of effectiveness—almost decidable.A tree Tr will be a subset of ω<ω that is closed under predecessor. For elements f, g in ω<ω ∪ ωω, ƒ ⊲ g iffdf ∀i < lh(ƒ)[ƒ(i) = g(i)].

Prime models of finite computable dimension

2009 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 336-348
Author(s):  
Pavel Semukhin
Keyword(s):  
Order Theory ◽  
Prime Model ◽  
Computable Model ◽  
Undirected Graphs ◽  
Integral Domains ◽  
Computable Model Theory ◽  
First Order ◽  
First Order Theory ◽  
Computable Dimension ◽  
Open Question

AbstractWe study the following open question in computable model theory: does there exist a structure of computable dimension two which is the prime model of its first-order theory? We construct an example of such a structure by coding a certain family of c.e. sets with exactly two one-to-one computable enumerations into a directed graph. We also show that there are examples of such structures in the classes of undirected graphs, partial orders, lattices, and integral domains.

ON ISOMORPHISM CLASSES OF COMPUTABLY ENUMERABLE EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS

2019 ◽  
Vol 85 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
URI ANDREWS ◽  
SERIKZHAN A. BADAEV
Keyword(s):  
Explicit Construction ◽  
The Other ◽  
Equivalence Relations ◽  
Index Set ◽  
Isomorphism Classes ◽  
Closed Sets ◽  
Open Questions ◽  
Index Sets ◽  
Image Position ◽  
Computably Enumerable

AbstractWe examine how degrees of computably enumerable equivalence relations (ceers) under computable reduction break down into isomorphism classes. Two ceers are isomorphic if there is a computable permutation of ω which reduces one to the other. As a method of focusing on nontrivial differences in isomorphism classes, we give special attention to weakly precomplete ceers. For any degree, we consider the number of isomorphism types contained in the degree and the number of isomorphism types of weakly precomplete ceers contained in the degree. We show that the number of isomorphism types must be 1 or ω, and it is 1 if and only if the ceer is self-full and has no computable classes. On the other hand, we show that the number of isomorphism types of weakly precomplete ceers contained in the degree can be any member of $[0,\omega ]$. In fact, for any $n \in [0,\omega ]$, there is a degree d and weakly precomplete ceers ${E_1}, \ldots ,{E_n}$ in d so that any ceer R in d is isomorphic to ${E_i} \oplus D$ for some $i \le n$ and D a ceer with domain either finite or ω comprised of finitely many computable classes. Thus, up to a trivial equivalence, the degree d splits into exactly n classes.We conclude by answering some lingering open questions from the literature: Gao and Gerdes [11] define the collection of essentially FC ceers to be those which are reducible to a ceer all of whose classes are finite. They show that the index set of essentially FC ceers is ${\rm{\Pi }}_3^0$-hard, though the definition is ${\rm{\Sigma }}_4^0$. We close the gap by showing that the index set is ${\rm{\Sigma }}_4^0$-complete. They also use index sets to show that there is a ceer all of whose classes are computable, but which is not essentially FC, and they ask for an explicit construction, which we provide.Andrews and Sorbi [4] examined strong minimal covers of downwards-closed sets of degrees of ceers. We show that if $\left( {{E_i}} \right)$ is a uniform c.e. sequence of non universal ceers, then $\left\{ {{ \oplus _{i \le j}}{E_i}|j \in \omega } \right\}$ has infinitely many incomparable strong minimal covers, which we use to answer some open questions from [4].Lastly, we show that there exists an infinite antichain of weakly precomplete ceers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document