Assessing Data Quality: An Approach and An Application

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-24
Author(s):  
Kelly McMann ◽  
Daniel Pemstein ◽  
Brigitte Seim ◽  
Jan Teorell ◽  
Staffan Lindberg

Abstract Political scientists routinely face the challenge of assessing the quality (validity and reliability) of measures in order to use them in substantive research. While stand-alone assessment tools exist, researchers rarely combine them comprehensively. Further, while a large literature informs data producers, data consumers lack guidance on how to assess existing measures for use in substantive research. We delineate a three-component practical approach to data quality assessment that integrates complementary multimethod tools to assess: (1) content validity; (2) the validity and reliability of the data generation process; and (3) convergent validity. We apply our quality assessment approach to the corruption measures from the Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) project, both illustrating our rubric and unearthing several quality advantages and disadvantages of the V-Dem measures, compared to other existing measures of corruption.

2019 ◽  
Vol 214 ◽  
pp. 01030
Author(s):  
Juraj Smiesko

An integrated system for data quality and conditions assessment for the ATLAS Tile Calorimeter is known amongst the ATLAS Tile Calorimeter as the Tile-in-One. It is a platform for combining all of the ATLAS Tile Calorimeter offline data quality tools in one unified web interface. It achieves this by using simple main web server to serve as central hub and group of small web applications called plugins, which provide the data quality assessment tools. Every plugin runs in its own virtual machine in order to prevent interference between the plugins and also to increase stability of the platform.


2016 ◽  
Vol 140 (4) ◽  
pp. 3410-3410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Dakin ◽  
John Dorocicz ◽  
Ben Biffard ◽  
Nathan D. Merchant ◽  
David Hannay ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Nemanja Igić ◽  
Branko Terzić ◽  
Milan Matić ◽  
Vladimir Ivančević ◽  
Ivan Luković

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. e000353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luke A Turcotte ◽  
Jake Tran ◽  
Joshua Moralejo ◽  
Nancy Curtin-Telegdi ◽  
Leslie Eckel ◽  
...  

BackgroundHealth information systems with applications in patient care planning and decision support depend on high-quality data. A postacute care hospital in Ontario, Canada, conducted data quality assessment and focus group interviews to guide the development of a cross-disciplinary training programme to reimplement the Resident Assessment Instrument–Minimum Data Set (RAI-MDS) 2.0 comprehensive health assessment into the hospital’s clinical workflows.MethodsA hospital-level data quality assessment framework based on time series comparisons against an aggregate of Ontario postacute care hospitals was used to identify areas of concern. Focus groups were used to evaluate assessment practices and the use of health information in care planning and clinical decision support. The data quality assessment and focus groups were repeated to evaluate the effectiveness of the training programme.ResultsInitial data quality assessment and focus group indicated that knowledge, practice and cultural barriers prevented both the collection and use of high-quality clinical data. Following the implementation of the training, there was an improvement in both data quality and the culture surrounding the RAI-MDS 2.0 assessment.ConclusionsIt is important for facilities to evaluate the quality of their health information to ensure that it is suitable for decision-making purposes. This study demonstrates the use of a data quality assessment framework that can be applied for quality improvement planning.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document