scholarly journals A sequence algebra associated with distributions

1978 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-49
Author(s):  
G.M. Petersen
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Banach Algebra ◽  
Uniform Distribution ◽  
Sequence Algebra ◽  
Image Position ◽  
Summability Matrix ◽  
Uniform Distribution Of Sequences ◽  
Regular Summability

If A = {am,n} is a regular summability matrix, the sequence s = {sn} is said to be A uniformly distributed (see L. Kuipers, H. Niederreiter, Uniform distribution of sequences, p. 221, John Wiley & Sons, New York, London, Sydney, Toronto, 1974), if(h = 1, 2, …). In this paper we examine sequences belonging to A*, where t ∈ A* if and only if t is bounded and s + t is A uniformly distributed whenever s is A uniformly distributed. By A′ are denoted those members t of A* such that at ∈ A* for every real a. The members of A′ form a Banach algebra, A* is not connected under the sup norm, but A′ is a component.

Inclusion sets of regular summability matrices. III

1966 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 389-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. W. Baker ◽  
G. M. Petersen
Keyword(s):  
Bounded Sequence ◽  
Finite Set ◽  
Summability Matrices ◽  
Image Position ◽  
Summability Matrix ◽  
Regular Summability ◽  
Bounded Sequences

Let A = (am, n) be a (regular summability) matrix. Then will denote the set of bounded sequences which are summed by A. If {Ai} (i = 1, 2, …, N) is a finite set of such matrices, and if consists of every bounded sequence then we shall say that the matrices span the bounded sequences. Ifx = {xn} belongs to then we denote the value to which A sums x by A-lim x. If y = {yn} is any sequence, then the A-transform of y (if it exists) is the sequence {Aμ(y)}, where

Matrices and norms

1961 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 271-273
Author(s):  
G. M. Petersen
Keyword(s):  
Bounded Sequence ◽  
The Other ◽  
Image Position ◽  
Summability Matrix ◽  
Regular Summability ◽  
Bounded Sequences

We shall define the norm h(A) of a regular summability matrix A = (amn) by Two matrices are said to be b-equivalent if every bounded sequence summable by on matrix is summable by the other. If A sums all bounded sequences that are summable by B, A is said to be b-stronger than B. The norm of a method is defined as , where the inf is taken over all the matrices equivalent to for bounded sequences. These norms have been investigated by Brudno(1). One of his main results is that, if sums all bounded sequences that are summable, then In paper we shall prove the following.

scholarly journals On Kadison's condition for extreme points of the unit ball in a B*-algebra

1969 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 245-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bertram Yood
Keyword(s):  
Unit Ball ◽  
Banach Algebra ◽  
Extreme Points ◽  
Complex Banach Algebra ◽  
Image Position

Let B be a complex Banach algebra with an identity 1 and an involution x→x*. Kadison (1) has shown that, if B is a B*-algebra, [the set of extreme points of its unit ball coincides with the set of elements x of B for which

On the Definition of C*-Algebras II

1985 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 664-681 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoltán Magyar ◽  
Zoltán Sebestyén
Keyword(s):  
Hilbert Space ◽  
Banach Algebra ◽  
Representation Theorem ◽  
Banach Algebras ◽  
Bounded Operators ◽  
Fundamental Representation ◽  
C Algebras ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Image Position

The theory of noncommutative involutive Banach algebras (briefly Banach *-algebras) owes its origin to Gelfand and Naimark, who proved in 1943 the fundamental representation theorem that a Banach *-algebra with C*-condition(C*)is *-isomorphic and isometric to a norm-closed self-adjoint subalgebra of all bounded operators on a suitable Hilbert space.At the same time they conjectured that the C*-condition can be replaced by the B*-condition.(B*)In other words any B*-algebra is actually a C*-algebra. This was shown by Glimm and Kadison [5] in 1960.

scholarly journals On a problem of Barnes and Duncan

1991 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 321-323
Author(s):  
R. G. McLean
Keyword(s):  
Banach Algebra ◽  
Free Monoid ◽  
Finite Dimensional ◽  
Image Position ◽  
Funct Anal

Consider the free monoid on a non-empty set P, and let R be the quotient monoid determined by the relations:Let R have its natural involution * in which each element of P is Hermitian. We show that the Banach *-algebra ℓ1(R) has a separating family of finite dimensional *-representations and consequently is *-semisimple. This generalizes a result of B. A. Barnes and J. Duncan (J. Funct. Anal.18 (1975), 96–113.) dealing with the case where P has two elements.

scholarly journals Banach algebra elements whose spectra intersect R+

1974 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. F. Bonsall ◽  
A. C. Thompson
Keyword(s):  
Banach Algebra ◽  
Spectral Radius ◽  
Real Numbers ◽  
Complex Banach Algebra ◽  
Image Position ◽  
Invertible Elements

Let A denote a complex Banach algebra with unit, Inv(A) the set of invertible elements of A, Sp(a) and r(a) the spectrum and spectral radius respectively of an element a of A. Let Γ denote the set of elements of A whose spectra contain non-negative real numbers, i.e.

scholarly journals Spectral radius formulae

1979 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 271-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. J. Murphy ◽  
T. T. West
Keyword(s):  
Banach Algebra ◽  
Spectral Radius ◽  
Quotient Algebra ◽  
Complex Banach Algebra ◽  
Image Position

If A is a complex Banach algebra (not necessarily unital) and x∈A, σ(x) will denote the spectrum and spectral radius of x in A. If I is a closed two-sided ideal in A let x + I denote the coset in the quotient algebra A/I containing x. Then

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document