scholarly journals Derivations, local derivations and atomic boolean subspace lattices

2002 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 477-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pengtong Li ◽  
Jipu Ma
Keyword(s):  
Banach Space ◽  
Linear Operator ◽  
Closed Linear Operator ◽  
Subspace Lattice ◽  
Local Derivation ◽  
Densely Defined ◽  
Subspace Lattices

Let ℒ be an atomic Boolean subspace lattice on a Banach space X. In this paper, we prove that if ℳ is an ideal of Alg ℒ then every derivation δ from Alg ℒ into ℳ is necessarily quasi-spatial, that is, there exists a densely defined closed linear operator T: 𝒟(T) ⊆ X → X with its domain 𝒟(T) invariant under every element of Alg ℒ, such that δ(A) x = (TA – AT) x for every A ∈ Alg ℒ and every x ∈ 𝒟(T). Also, if ℳ ⊆ ℬ(X) is an Alg ℒ-module then it is shown that every local derivation from Alg ℒ into ℳ is necessary a derivation. In particular, every local derivation from Alg ℒ into ℬ(X) is a derivation and every local derivation from Alg ℒ into itself is a quasi-spatial derivation.

scholarly journals Closed linear operators with domain containing their range

1984 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 229-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Schôichi Ôta
Keyword(s):  
Banach Space ◽  
Hilbert Space ◽  
Linear Operator ◽  
Linear Operators ◽  
Closed Linear Operator ◽  
Unbounded Operators ◽  
Densely Defined ◽  
Closed Linear Operators

In connection with algebras of unbounded operators, Lassner showed in [4] that, if T is a densely defined, closed linear operator in a Hilbert space such that its domain is contained in the domain of its adjoint T* and is globally invariant under T and T*,then T is bounded. In the case of a Banach space (in particular, a C*-algebra) weshowed in [6] that a densely defined closed derivation in a C*-algebra with domaincontaining its range is automatically bounded (see the references in [6] and [7] for thetheory of derivations in C*-algebras).

Formally Normal Operators Having no Normal Extensions

1965 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 1030-1040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Earl A. Coddington
Keyword(s):  
Hilbert Space ◽  
Linear Operator ◽  
Null Space ◽  
Normal Operator ◽  
Closed Linear Operator ◽  
Normal Operators ◽  
The Given ◽  
Densely Defined ◽  
Made In

The domain and null space of an operator A in a Hilbert space will be denoted by and , respectively. A formally normal operatorN in is a densely defined closed (linear) operator such that , and for all A normal operator in is a formally normal operator N satisfying 35 . A study of the possibility of extending a formally normal operator N to a normal operator in the given , or in a larger Hilbert space, was made in (1).

scholarly journals Some Spaces are not the Domain of a Closed Linear Operator in a Banach Space

1980 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 501-503
Author(s):  
Peter Dierolf ◽  
Susanne Dierolf
Keyword(s):  
Banach Space ◽  
Differential Operator ◽  
Linear Operator ◽  
Partial Differential Operator ◽  
Linear Partial Differential Operator ◽  
Closed Linear Operator ◽  
Partial Differential ◽  
Minimal Operator ◽  
Constant Coefficients

Let be a linear partial differential operator with C∞- coefficients. The study of P(∂) as an operator in L2(ℝn) usually starts with the investigation of the minimal operator P0 which is the closure of P(∂) acting on . In the case of constant coefficients it is known that the domain D(P0) of P0 at least contains the space (cf. Schechter [4, p. 58, Lemma 1.2]).

An unbounded spectral mapping theorem

1968 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. J. Bernau
Keyword(s):  
Banach Space ◽  
Linear Operator ◽  
Closed Subset ◽  
Complex Banach Space ◽  
Complex Numbers ◽  
Spectral Mapping Theorem ◽  
Complex Polynomials ◽  
Spectral Mapping ◽  
Image Position ◽  
Densely Defined

Recall that the spectrum, σ(T), of a linear operator T in a complex Banach space is the set of complex numbers λ such that T—λI does not have a densely defined bounded inverse. It is known [7, § 5.1] that σ(T) is a closed subset of the complex plane C. If T is not bounded, σ(T) may be empty or the whole of C. If σ(T) ≠ C and T is closed the spectral mapping theorem, is valid for complex polynomials p(z) [7, §5.7]. Also, if T is closed and λ ∉ σ(T), (T–λI)−1 is everywhere defined.

scholarly journals Relatively compact-like perturbations, essential spectra and application

2004 ◽  
Vol 77 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khalid Latrach ◽  
J. Martin Paoli
Keyword(s):  
Banach Space ◽  
Linear Operator ◽  
Neutron Transport ◽  
Linear Operators ◽  
Essential Spectra ◽  
Graph Norm ◽  
Bounded Linear ◽  
Neutron Transport Equations ◽  
Densely Defined ◽  
Fredholm Perturbations

AbstractThe purpose of this paper is to provide a detailed treatment of the behaviour of essential spectra of closed densely defined linear operators subjected to additive perturbations not necessarily belonging to any ideal of the algebra of bounded linear operators. IfAdenotes a closed densely defined linear operator on a Banach spaceX, our approach consists principally in considering the class ofA-closable operators which, regarded as operators in ℒ(XA,X) (whereXAdenotes the domain ofAequipped with the graph norm), are contained in the set ofA-Fredholm perturbations (see Definition 1.2). Our results are used to describe the essential spectra of singular neutron transport equations in bounded geometries.

Remarks on Invariant Subspace Lattices

1969 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 639-643 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Rosenthal
Keyword(s):  
Hilbert Space ◽  
Linear Operator ◽  
Invariant Subspace ◽  
Complete Lattice ◽  
Bounded Linear Operator ◽  
Complex Hilbert Space ◽  
Subspace Lattice ◽  
Bounded Linear ◽  
Infinite Dimensional ◽  
Subspace Lattices

If A is a bounded linear operator on an infinite-dimensional complex Hilbert space H, let lat A denote the collection of all subspaces of H that are invariant under A; i.e., all closed linear subspaces M such that x ∈ M implies (Ax) ∈ M. There is very little known about the question: which families F of subspaces are invariant subspace lattices in the sense that they satisfy F = lat A for some A? (See [5] for a summary of most of what is known in answer to this question.) Clearly, if F is an invariant subspace lattice, then {0} ∈ F, H ∈ F and F is closed under arbitrary intersections and spans. Thus, every invariant subspace lattice is a complete lattice.

scholarly journals Abstract reflexive sublattices and completely distributive collapsibility

1998 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 245-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. E. Longstaff ◽  
J. B. Nation ◽  
Oreste Panaia
Keyword(s):  
Banach Space ◽  
Operator Theory ◽  
Operator Algebras ◽  
Galois Connection ◽  
General Situation ◽  
Subspace Lattice ◽  
Complete Lattices ◽  
Completely Distributive ◽  
Subspace Lattices

There is a natural Galois connection between subspace lattices and operator algebras on a Banach space which arises from the notion of invariance. If a subspace lattice ℒ is completely distributive, then ℒ is reflexive. In this paper we study the more general situation of complete lattices for which the least complete congruence δ on ℒ such that ℒ/δ is completely distributive is well-behaved. Our results are purely lattice theoretic, but the motivation comes from operator theory.

scholarly journals Pseudospectra in a non-Archimedean Banach space and essential pseudospectra in Eω

Filomat ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (12) ◽  
pp. 3961-3976
Author(s):  
Aymen Ammar ◽  
Ameni Bouchekoua ◽  
Aref Jeribi
Keyword(s):  
Banach Space ◽  
Hilbert Space ◽  
Linear Operator ◽  
Continuous Operator ◽  
Linear Operators ◽  
Closed Linear Operator ◽  
Completely Continuous ◽  
Completely Continuous Operator

In this work, we introduce and study the pseudospectra and the essential pseudospectra of linear operators in a non-Archimedean Banach space and in the non-Archimedean Hilbert space E?, respectively. In particular, we characterize these pseudospectra. Furthermore, inspired by T. Diagana and F. Ramaroson [12], we establish a relationship between the essential pseudospectrum of a closed linear operator and the essential pseudospectrum of this closed linear operator perturbed by completely continuous operator in the non-Archimedean Hilbert space E?.

On the Stability and Boundedness of Differential Systems

1962 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 492-496 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Lakshmikantham
Keyword(s):  
Banach Space ◽  
Linear Operator ◽  
Real Banach Space ◽  
Closed Linear Operator ◽  
Differential Systems ◽  
The Real ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Image Position ◽  
The Right

Consider the differential systemswhere A(t), g(t, y) and g(t, y) are operators acting in the real Banach space E, A(t) is an unbounded, closed, linear operator for each t in 0 ≤ t < ∞ and x0, y0 belong to the domain of definition of the operator A (t0). Let ‖x‖ denote the norm of an element x ε: E and R(λ, t) the resolvent of A(t). Here and in the following the prime denotes the right-hand derivative.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document