Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging in paediatric cochlear implant assessment: a pilot study and our experience at Great Ormond Street Hospital

2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (06) ◽  
pp. 529-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Kanona ◽  
K Stephenson ◽  
F D'Arco ◽  
K Rajput ◽  
L Cochrane ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Temporal Bone ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scan ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
High Resolution Computed Tomography ◽  
Street Hospital ◽  
Operative Assessment

AbstractBackgroundTo date, there is a lack of consensus regarding the use of both computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the pre-operative assessment of cochlear implant candidates.MethodsTwenty-five patients underwent high-resolution computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. ‘Control scores’ describing the expected visualisation of specific features by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging were established. An independent radiological review of all computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging scan features was then compared to the control scores and the findings recorded.ResultsAgreement with control scores occurred in 83 per cent (20 out of 24) of computed tomography scans and 91 per cent (21 out of 23) of magnetic resonance imaging scans. Radiological abnormalities were demonstrated in 16 per cent of brain scans and 18 per cent of temporal bone investigations.ConclusionAssessment in the paediatric setting constitutes a special situation given the likelihood of congenital temporal bone abnormalities and associated co-morbidities that may be relevant to surgery and prognosis following cochlear implantation. Both computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging contribute valuable information and remain necessary in paediatric cochlear implant pre-operative assessment.

scholarly journals Facial nerve anomalies in paediatric cochlear implant candidates: radiological evaluation

2016 ◽  
Vol 131 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
F B Palabiyik ◽  
K Hacikurt ◽  
Z Yazici
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
High Resolution ◽  
Facial Nerve ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Inner Ear ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
High Resolution Computed Tomography ◽  
Ear Anomalies

AbstractBackground:Pre-operative radiological identification of facial nerve anomalies can help prevent intra-operative facial nerve injury during cochlear implantation. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and configuration of facial nerve anomalies and their concurrence with inner-ear anomalies in cochlear implant candidates.Methods:Inner-ear and concomitant facial nerve anomalies were evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging and temporal high-resolution computed tomography in 48 children with congenital sensorineural hearing loss who were cochlear implant candidates.Results:Inner-ear anomalies were present in 11 out of 48 patients (23 per cent) and concomitant facial nerve anomalies were present on 7 sides in 4 patients (7 per cent of the total). Facial nerve anomalies were accompanied by cochlear or vestibular malformation.Conclusion:Potential facial nerve abnormalities should always be considered in patients with inner-ear anomalies. Pre-operative facial nerve imaging can increase the surgeon's confidence to plan and perform cochlear implantation. Magnetic resonance imaging should be used to detect inner-ear anomalies; if these are identified, temporal high-resolution computed tomography should be used to evaluate the facial nerve.

scholarly journals Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on neuroimaging scan volumes at a teaching hospital

2021 ◽  
pp. 197140092098866
Author(s):  
Daniel Thomas Ginat ◽  
James Kenniff
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
The United States ◽  
Radiology Department ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scan ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Academic Medical Centre ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
The Impact

Background The COVID-19 pandemic led to a widespread socioeconomic shutdown, including medical facilities in many parts of the world. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact on neuroimaging utilisation at an academic medical centre in the United States caused by this shutdown. Methods Exam volumes from 1 February 2020 to 11 August 2020 were calculated based on patient location, including outpatient, inpatient and emergency, as well as modality type, including computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. 13 March 2020 was designated as the beginning of the shutdown period for the radiology department and 1 May 2020 was designated as the reopening date. The scan volumes during the pre-shutdown, shutdown and post-shutdown periods were compared using t-tests. Results Overall, neuroimaging scan volumes declined significantly by 41% during the shutdown period and returned to 98% of the pre-shutdown period levels after the shutdown, with an estimated 3231 missed scans. Outpatient scan volumes were more greatly affected than inpatient scan volumes, while emergency scan volumes declined the least during the shutdown. In addition, the magnetic resonance imaging scan volumes declined to a greater degree than the computed tomography scan volumes during the shutdown. Conclusion The shutdown from the COVID-19 pandemic had a substantial but transient impact on neuroimaging utilisation overall, with variable magnitude depending on patient location and modality type.

Role of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in detecting the Prevalence of inner ear anomalies among cochlear implant candidates

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alaa Nasser Hussain Zaher ◽  
Tougan Taha Abd El Aziz ◽  
Ahmed Samy Abdelrahman
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Inner Ear ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
High Resolution Computed Tomography ◽  
Vestibular Aqueduct ◽  
Incomplete Partition ◽  
Ear Anomalies

Abstract Background Hearing loss management using cochlear implants in patients with inner ear anomalies has long been discussed in the otology community. Magnetic resonances imaging (B,/IRI) and Computed tomography (CT) play important roles in the preoperative assessment of inner ear abnormalities such as cochlear nerve deficiency and variant anatomy as these abnormalities may not only affect the decision of the implantation procedure or the patient's prognosis regarding auditory improvement, but also the risk of complications. Objective To examine the prevalence of inner ear anomalies among cochlear implant recipients in patients with congenital sensorineural hearing loss among the pediatric age group in the Demerdash hospital, Ain Shams university using High resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and MRI imaging. Methods A retrospective descriptive study over the course of 9 months that included all patients that are candidates for cochlear implant referred to the Radiology department, Ain Shams University Hospitals for a preoperative imaging in the form of CT and VIRI scans. Results CT and MRI scans of 33 patients who had congenital hearing loss and were candidates for cochlear implantation with total 66 ears were reviewed. Inner ear anomalies were identified in 8 patients representing a prevalence (24.2%) with 14 ear diseased. Anomalies were seen bilaterally in 6 patients and unilaterally in 2 patients. Among the 14 diseased ear, 9 ears (64.3%) were seen with incomplete partition Il, 7 ears (50%) were seen with enlarged vestibular aqueduct, 4 ears (28.6%) were seen with cochlear hypoplasia, 3 ears (21.4%) were seen with semicircular canal aplasia, 2 ears (14.3%) were seen with incomplete partition type I, 2 ears (14.3%) were seen with cochlear nerve aplasia, 2 ears with cochlear aplasia (14.3%), I ear (7.1%) was seen with common cavity ear (7.1%) with complete labyrinthine aplasia. Conclusion Prevalence of inner ear anomalies among cochlear implant candidates was 24.2%. This result is consistent with results worldwide and the most common anomalies were Incomplete partition Il and large vestibular aqueduct. Abbreviations Computed tomography (CT), Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), High resolution computed tomography (HRCT), Internal auditory canal (IAC), Cerebellopontine angle (CPA).

Bony cochlear nerve canal and internal auditory canal measures predict cochlear nerve status

2017 ◽  
Vol 131 (8) ◽  
pp. 676-683 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Tahir ◽  
M D Bajin ◽  
G Atay ◽  
B Ö Mocan ◽  
L Sennaroğlu
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Temporal Bone ◽  
Internal Auditory Canal ◽  
Cochlear Nerve ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Canal Stenosis ◽  
Canal Diameter ◽  
Canal Atresia

AbstractObjectives:The bony cochlear nerve canal is the space between the fundus of the internal auditory canal and the base of the cochlear modiolus that carries cochlear nerve fibres. This study aimed to determine the distribution of bony labyrinth anomalies and cochlear nerve anomalies in patients with bony cochlear nerve canal and internal auditory canal atresia and stenosis, and then to compare the diameter of the bony cochlear nerve canal and internal auditory canal with cochlear nerve status.Methods:The study included 38 sensorineural hearing loss patients (59 ears) in whom the bony cochlear nerve canal diameter at the mid-modiolus was 1.5 mm or less. Atretic and stenotic bony cochlear nerve canals were examined separately, and internal auditory canals with a mid-point diameter of less than 2 mm were considered stenotic. Temporal bone computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging scans were reviewed to determine cochlear nerve status.Results:Cochlear hypoplasia was noted in 44 out of 59 ears (75 per cent) with a bony cochlear nerve canal diameter at the mid-modiolus of 1.5 mm or less. Approximately 33 per cent of ears with bony cochlear nerve canal stenosis also had a stenotic internal auditory canal and 84 per cent had a hypoplastic or aplastic cochlear nerve. All patients with bony cochlear nerve canal atresia had cochlear nerve deficiency. The cochlear nerve was hypoplastic or aplastic when the diameter of the bony cochlear nerve canal was less than 1.5 mm and the diameter of the internal auditory canal was less than 2 mm.Conclusion:The cochlear nerve may be aplastic or hypoplastic even if temporal bone computed tomography findings indicate a normal cochlea. If possible, patients scheduled to receive a cochlear implant should undergo both computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the temporal bone. The bony cochlear nerve canal and internal auditory canal are complementary structures, and both should be assessed to determine cochlear nerve status.

Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Inner Ear

1988 ◽  
Vol 99 (5) ◽  
pp. 494-504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert K. Jackler ◽  
William P. Dillon
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Inner Ear ◽  
Semicircular Canals ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
High Resolution Computed Tomography ◽  
Membranous Labyrinth ◽  
Prosthetic Devices ◽  
Ear Malformations

The majority of temporal bone radiographic studies are obtained either for middle ear and mastoid disease or in the evaluation of retrocochlear pathology. With recent technologic advances, diagnostic imaging of the inner ear has developed an increasing role in the evaluation and management of diseases that affect the cochlea, semicircular canals, and the vestibular and cochlear aqueducts. High-resolution computed tomography (CT) provides excellent detail of the osseous labyrinth, whereas magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) generates images derived from the membranous labyrinth and its associated neural elements. Optimal techniques for obtaining high quality CT and MRI images of the normal and diseased inner ear are presented. CT has proved useful in the evaluation of inner ear malformations, cochlear otosclerosis, labyrinthine fistulization from cholesteatoma, translabyrinthine fractures, otic capsule osteodystrophies, in the assessment of cochlear patency before cochlear implantation, and in the localization of prosthetic devices such as stapes wires and cochlear implants. While MRI produces discernible images of the soft tissue and fluid components of the inner ear, it has yet to demonstrate any unique advantages in the evaluation of inner ear disease. However, MRI produces excellent and highly useful images of the audiovestibular and facial nerves, cerebellopontine angle, and brain.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document