scholarly journals On modification of the q-L-series and its applications

2001 ◽  
Vol 164 ◽  
pp. 185-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hirofumi Tsumura

We slightly modify the definitions of q-Hurwitz ζ-functions and q-L-series constructed by J. Satoh. By using these modified functions, we give some relations for the ordinary Dirichlet L-series. Especially we give an elementary proof of Katsurada’s formula on the values of Dirichlet L-series at positive integers.

2018 ◽  
Vol 175 ◽  
pp. 03036
Author(s):  
Lanyou Li ◽  
Jingui Lu ◽  
Jianhong Chen

In this paper, we give an elementary proof that the real roots nonexistence of nonlinear equation such as: xn+yn+zn=n,where n =1,2,3,(x,y,z)∈ℝ by contradiction. Thus, when n takes all positive integers between 4 and 1981, the value of function f= xn+yn+zn based on the exact solution of the above equations is still real. Finally, numerical experiments presents a set of approximate numerical solutions by using standard genetic algorithm(SGA), adaptive particle swarm optimization algorithm(APSO) and artificial fish swarm algorithm(AFSA).


1983 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 399-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.A. Cichon ◽  
S.S. Wainer

We give here an elementary proof of a recent result of Girard [4] comparing the rates of growth of the two principal (and extreme) examples of a spectrum of “majorization hierarchies”—i.e. hierarchies of increasing number-theoretic functions, indexed by (systems of notations for) initial segments I of the countable ordinals so that if α < β ∈ I then the βth function dominates the αth one at all but finitely-many positive integers x.Hardy [5] was perhaps the first to make use of a majorization hierarchy—the Hα's below—in “exhibiting” a set of reals with cardinality ℵ1. More recently such hierarchies have played important roles in mathematical logic because they provide natural classifications of recursive functions according to their computational complexity. (All the functions considered here are “honest” in the sense that the size of their values gives a measure of the number of steps needed to compute them.)The hierarchies we are concerned with fall into three main classes depending on their mode of generation at successor stages, the other crucial parameter being the initial choice of a particular (standard) fundamental sequence λ0 < λ1 < λ2 < … to each limit ordinal λ under consideration which, by a suitable diagonalization, will then determine the generation at stage λ.Our later comparisons will require the use of a “large” initial segment I of proof-theoretic ordinals, extending as far as the “Howard ordinal”. However we will postpone a precise description of these ordinals and their associated fundamental sequences until later.


1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 356-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia'an Yan
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Barner

Perceptual representations – e.g., of objects or approximate magnitudes –are often invoked as building blocks that children combine with linguisticsymbols when they acquire the positive integers. Systems of numericalperception are either assumed to contain the logical foundations ofarithmetic innately, or to supply the basis for their induction. Here Ipropose an alternative to this general framework, and argue that theintegers are not learned from perceptual systems, but instead arise toexplain perception as part of language acquisition. Drawing oncross-linguistic data and developmental data, I show that small numbers(1-4) and large numbers (~5+) arise both historically and in individualchildren via entirely distinct mechanisms, constituting independentlearning problems, neither of which begins with perceptual building blocks.Specifically, I propose that children begin by learning small numbers(i.e., *one, two, three*) using the same logical resources that supportother linguistic markers of number (e.g., singular, plural). Several yearslater, children discover the logic of counting by inferring the logicalrelations between larger number words from their roles in blind countingprocedures, and only incidentally associate number words with perception ofapproximate magnitudes, in an *ad hoc* and highly malleable fashion.Counting provides a form of explanation for perception but is not causallyderived from perceptual systems.


10.37236/1729 ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Graham Denham

Let $a_1,\ldots,a_n$ be distinct, positive integers with $(a_1,\ldots,a_n)=1$, and let k be an arbitrary field. Let $H(a_1,\ldots,a_n;z)$ denote the Hilbert series of the graded algebra k$[t^{a_1},t^{a_2},\ldots,t^{a_n}]$. We show that, when $n=3$, this rational function has a simple expression in terms of $a_1,a_2,a_3$; in particular, the numerator has at most six terms. By way of contrast, it is known that no such expression exists for any $n\geq4$.


10.37236/1735 ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dhruv Mubayi ◽  
Yi Zhao

Given positive integers $n,k,t$, with $2 \le k\le n$, and $t < 2^k$, let $m(n,k,t)$ be the minimum size of a family ${\cal F}$ of nonempty subsets of $[n]$ such that every $k$-set in $[n]$ contains at least $t$ sets from ${\cal F}$, and every $(k-1)$-set in $[n]$ contains at most $t-1$ sets from ${\cal F}$. Sloan et al. determined $m(n, 3, 2)$ and Füredi et al. studied $m(n, 4, t)$ for $t=2, 3$. We consider $m(n, 3, t)$ and $m(n, 4, t)$ for all the remaining values of $t$ and obtain their exact values except for $k=4$ and $t= 6, 7, 11, 12$. For example, we prove that $ m(n, 4, 5) = {n \choose 2}-17$ for $n\ge 160$. The values of $m(n, 4, t)$ for $t=7,11,12$ are determined in terms of well-known (and open) Turán problems for graphs and hypergraphs. We also obtain bounds of $m(n, 4, 6)$ that differ by absolute constants.


2020 ◽  
pp. 77-83
Author(s):  
Mohammad Shadab Khan ◽  
Mohd Arif Raza ◽  
Nadeemur Rehman

Let R be a prime ring, I a nonzero ideal of R, d a derivation of R and m, n fixed positive integers. (i) If (d ( r ○ s)(r ○ s) + ( r ○ s) d ( r ○ s)n - d ( r ○ s))m for all r, s ϵ I, then R is commutative. (ii) If (d ( r ○ s)( r ○ s) + ( r ○ s) d ( r ○ s)n - d (r ○ s))m ϵ Z(R) for all r, s ϵ I, then R satisfies s4, the standard identity in four variables. Moreover, we also examine the case when R is a semiprime ring.


1926 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 97-99
Author(s):  
Matsusaburô Fujiwara
Keyword(s):  

Symmetry ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 605
Author(s):  
Martin Bača ◽  
Zuzana Kimáková ◽  
Marcela Lascsáková ◽  
Andrea Semaničová-Feňovčíková

For a simple graph G with no isolated edges and at most, one isolated vertex, a labeling φ:E(G)→{1,2,…,k} of positive integers to the edges of G is called irregular if the weights of the vertices, defined as wtφ(v)=∑u∈N(v)φ(uv), are all different. The irregularity strength of a graph G is known as the maximal integer k, minimized over all irregular labelings, and is set to ∞ if no such labeling exists. In this paper, we determine the exact value of the irregularity strength and the modular irregularity strength of fan graphs.


Mathematics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (15) ◽  
pp. 1813
Author(s):  
S. Subburam ◽  
Lewis Nkenyereye ◽  
N. Anbazhagan ◽  
S. Amutha ◽  
M. Kameswari ◽  
...  

Consider the Diophantine equation yn=x+x(x+1)+⋯+x(x+1)⋯(x+k), where x, y, n, and k are integers. In 2016, a research article, entitled – ’power values of sums of products of consecutive integers’, primarily proved the inequality n= 19,736 to obtain all solutions (x,y,n) of the equation for the fixed positive integers k≤10. In this paper, we improve the bound as n≤ 10,000 for the same case k≤10, and for any fixed general positive integer k, we give an upper bound depending only on k for n.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document