scholarly journals Direct Summands of Syzygy Modules of the Residue Class Field

2008 ◽  
Vol 189 ◽  
pp. 1-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryo Takahashi

AbstractLet R be a commutative Noetherian local ring. This paper deals with the problem asking whether R is Gorenstein if the nth syzygy module of the residue class field of R has a non-trivial direct summand of finite G-dimension for some n. It is proved that if n is at most two then it is true, and moreover, the structure of the ring R is determined essentially uniquely.

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (05) ◽  
pp. 1950097
Author(s):  
Dipankar Ghosh

Let [Formula: see text] be a Cohen–Macaulay local ring. We prove that the [Formula: see text]th syzygy module of a maximal Cohen–Macaulay [Formula: see text]-module cannot have a semidualizing direct summand for every [Formula: see text]. In particular, it follows that [Formula: see text] is Gorenstein if and only if some syzygy of a canonical module of [Formula: see text] has a nonzero free direct summand. We also give a number of necessary and sufficient conditions for a Cohen–Macaulay local ring of minimal multiplicity to be regular or Gorenstein. These criteria are based on vanishing of certain Exts or Tors involving syzygy modules of the residue field.


1991 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-153
Author(s):  
Alain Escassut ◽  
Marie-Claude Sarmant

Let K be an algebraically closed field complete with respect to an ultrametric absolute value |.| and let k be its residue class field. We assume k to have characteristic zero (hence K has characteristic zero too).Let D be a clopen bounded infraconnected set [3] in K, let R(D) be the algebra of the rational functions with no pole in D, let ‖.‖D be the norm of uniform convergence on D defined on R(D), and let H(D) be the algebra of the analytic elements on D i.e. the completion of R(D) for the norm ‖.‖D.


1982 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 589-592
Author(s):  
Mark Ramras

The Betti numbers βn(k) of the residue class field k = R/m of a commutative local ring (R, m) have been studied for about 20 years, primarily as the coefficients of the Poincaré series of E . Several authors have obtained results about the growth of the sequence {βn(k)}.For example, Gulliksen [3] showed that when R is non-regular, the sequence is non-decreasing. More recently, Avramov [1] studied asymptotic properties of {βn(k)} and found that under certain conditions the growth is exponential, i.e., there is a natural number p such that for all n, βpn(k) ≧ 2n.In this paper, we examine the sequence {βn(M)} for arbitrary finitely generated non-free modules M over any commutative local artin ring R. We establish the following bounds:123where l(X) is the length of X.


k is the residue-class field o/p of a ring 0 of p-adic integers. Sufficient conditions are found, I that a given representation p of a group G over k may be lifted to a representation r of G over o, particularly in the case where it is assumed that such a lifting exists for the restriction of p to a given subgroup H of G . The conditions involve certain homological invariants of p .


1971 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
pp. 149-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Williamson

The notions of tame and wild ramification lead us to make the following definition.Definition. The quotient field extension of an extension of discrete rank one valuation rings is said to be fiercely ramified if the residue class field extension has a nontrivial inseparable part.


Author(s):  
Ben Brubaker ◽  
Daniel Bump ◽  
Solomon Friedberg

This chapter introduces the Knowability Lemma, which explains when products of Gauss sums associated to elements of a preaccordion are explicitly evaluable as polynomials in q, the order of the residue class field. It considers an episode in the cartoon associated to the short Gelfand-Tsetlin pattern and the three cases that apply according to the Knowability Lemma, two of which are maximality and knowability. Knowability is not important for the proof that Statement C implies Statement B. The chapter discusses the cases where ε‎ is Class II or Class I, leaving the remaining two cases to the reader. It also describes the variant of the argument for the case that ε‎ is of Class I, again leaving the two other cases to the reader.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document