The severely mentally ill in residential facilities: a national survey in Italy

2004 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 421-431 ◽  
Author(s):  
GIOVANNI de GIROLAMO ◽  
ANGELO PICARDI ◽  
GIOVANNI SANTONE ◽  
IAN FALLOON ◽  
PIERLUIGI MOROSINI ◽  
...  

Objective. In Italy, Residential Facilities (RFs) have completely replaced Mental Hospitals (MHs) for the residential care of mentally ill patients. We studied all patients resident in 265 randomly sampled Italian RFs (20% of the total).Method. Structured interviews focusing on each patient were conducted by trained research assistants with the manager and staff of each RF. Patients were rated with the HoNOS and the GAF, and comprehensive information about their sociodemographic and clinical status and care history were gathered.Results. Of the 2962 patients living in the sampled facilities, most were males (63·2%) who had never married, more than 70% were over 40 years; 85% on a pension, most commonly because of psychiatric disability. A substantial proportion (39·8%) had never worked and very few were currently employed (2·5%); 45% of the sample was totally inactive, not even assisting with domestic activities in the facility. Two-thirds had a diagnosis of schizophrenia; co-morbid or primary substance abuse were uncommon. Twenty-one per cent had a history of severe interpersonal violence, but violent episodes in the RFs were infrequent. The managers judged almost three-quarters appropriately placed in their facilities and considered that very few had short-term prospects of discharge.Conclusions. Italian RFs cater for a large patient population of severely mentally ill requiring residential care. Discharge to independent accommodation is uncommon. Future studies should attempt to clarify how to match residential programmes with patients' disabilities.

2005 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 305-305

This issue features groups of papers dealing with ethnic and transcultural psychiatry, psychopathology in adolescents and their parents, and nicotine withdrawal, together with three papers on other issues, respectively severely mentally ill patients in residential facilities in Italy, interferon-induced cognitive changes, and persistence of impairment in personality disorders. The lead review article by Verdoux et al. (pp. 307–315) reviews studies addressing the question of whether dependence on benzodiazepines, drugs well known to produce cognitive effects when administered currently, is followed by enduring cognitive deficits after withdrawal.


2005 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodolfo Tomasi ◽  
Giovanni de Girolamo ◽  
Giovanni Santone ◽  
Angelo Picardi ◽  
Rocco Micciolo ◽  
...  

SUMMARYAims — To investigate in a representative national sample (N=2,962) of patients living in Residential Facilities (RFs) patterns of polypharmacy as well as related variables, association between diagnoses and therapeutic patterns, and the rate of adverse events. Methods — Structured interviews focusing on each patient were conducted by trained research assistants with the manager and staff of each RF. Patients were rated with the HoNOS and the SOFAS, and comprehensive information about their sociodemographic and clinical status, and their pharmacological regimes were collected. Results — Conventional antipsychotics and second-generation antipsychotics were prescribed to 65% and 43% of the sample, respectively. Benzodiazepines were prescribed to two-thirds of the sample, while antidepressants were the least-used class of psychotropics. Polypharmacy was common: on average, each treated patient was taking 2.7 drugs (±1.1); antipsychotic polypharmacy was also common. Many prescriptions were loosely related to specific diagnoses. Antiparkinsonianian drugs were prescribed to approximately 1/4 of the sample. Mild or severe adverse events in the previous month were reported for 9.9% and 1.4% of the sample, respectively. About 15% of patients suffered from tardive dyskinesia. Conclusions — Psychotropic drug prescription patterns for severe patients living in RFs are only sometimes satisfactory and offer the opportunity of improvement. Specific actions are required to improve prescription patterns for severe patients in RFs.Declaration of Interest: in the past two years GdG has received two speaker fees from Janssen-Cilag and from Eli Lilly; GS has received one speaker fee from Solvay. RM, AP, SF and RT have received no fees or other financial support from pharmaceutical companies.


1989 ◽  
Vol 154 (6) ◽  
pp. 775-782 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liz Kuipers ◽  
Brigid MacCarthy ◽  
Jane Hurry ◽  
Rod Harper ◽  
Alain LeSage

A psychosocial intervention is described geared to the needs of carers of the long-term mentally ill, which is feasible for a busy clinical team to implement: relatives were not selected for the group by patient diagnosis or motivation and little extra staff input was required. An interactive education session at home was followed by a monthly relatives group which aimed to reduce components of expressed emotion (EE) and to alleviate burden. The group facilitators adopted a directive but non-judgemental style, and constructive coping efforts were encouraged. The intervention was effective at reducing EE and improving family relationships. The study offers a realistic model of how to offer support to people providing long-term care for the severely mentally ill.


2014 ◽  
Vol 210 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rocio Acera Pozzi ◽  
Lynn M. Yee ◽  
Kara Brown ◽  
Kara E. Driscoll ◽  
Priya V. Rajan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document